Literature DB >> 17724264

Transient limb ischemia induces remote preconditioning and remote postconditioning in humans by a K(ATP)-channel dependent mechanism.

Stavros P Loukogeorgakis1, Rupert Williams, Anna T Panagiotidou, Shyamsunder K Kolvekar, Ann Donald, Tim J Cole, Derek M Yellon, John E Deanfield, Raymond J MacAllister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transient limb ischemia administered before a prolonged ischemic insult has systemic protective effects against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury (remote ischemic preconditioning [RIPC]). It has been demonstrated that protection from IR can be achieved by brief periods of ischemia applied at a remote site during an injurious ischemic event (remote postconditioning [RPostC]). Using an in vivo model of endothelial IR injury, we sought to determine whether RPostC occurred in humans and whether it shared mechanistic similarities with RIPC. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation before and after IR (20 minutes of arm ischemia followed by reperfusion). RIPC was induced by conditioning cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and reperfusion on the contralateral arm or leg before IR. For RPostC induction, conditioning cycles were administered during the ischemic phase of IR. Oral glibenclamide was used to determine the dependence of RIPC and RPostC on K(ATP) channels. IR caused a significant reduction in flow-mediated dilation in healthy volunteers (baseline, 9.3+/-1.2% versus post-IR, 3.3+/-0.7%; P<0.0001) and patients with atherosclerosis (baseline, 5.5+/-0.6% versus post-IR, 2.3+/-0.5%; P<0.01). This reduction was prevented by RIPC (post-IR+RIPC: healthy volunteers, 7.2+/-0.5% [P<0.0001 versus post-IR]; patients, 4.5+/-0.3% [P<0.01 versus post-IR]) and RPostC (post-IR+RPostC: 8.0+/-0.5%; P<0.0001 versus post-IR). The protective effects of RIPC and RPostC were blocked by glibenclamide.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time in humans that RPostC can be induced by transient limb ischemia and is as effective as RIPC in preventing endothelial IR injury. RIPC and RPostC share mechanistic similarities, with protection being dependent on K(ATP) channel activation. These results suggest that remote conditioning stimuli could be protective in patients with acute ischemia about to undergo therapeutic reperfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17724264     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  80 in total

Review 1.  Remote ischemic preconditioning for kidney protection: GSK3β-centric insights into the mechanism of action.

Authors:  Zhangsuo Liu; Rujun Gong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Seven consecutive days of remote ischaemic preconditioning improves cutaneous vasodilatory capacity in young adults.

Authors:  James A Lang; Jahyun Kim; Warren D Franke; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Preconditioning and its clinical potential.

Authors:  P Magill; T Murphy; D J Bouchier-Hayes; K J Mulhall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Moving towards preconditioning for neurological disorders: are we ready for clinical trials?

Authors:  Sebastian Koch
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Tefillin use induces remote ischemic preconditioning pathways in healthy men.

Authors:  A Phillip Owens; Nathan Robbins; Keith Saum; Shannon M Jones; Akiva Kirschner; Jessica G Woo; Connie McCoy; Samuel Slone; Marc E Rothenberg; Elaine M Urbina; Michael Tranter; Jack Rubinstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Effect of hyperglycaemia and diabetes on acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by ischaemic conditioning protocols.

Authors:  Claudia Penna; Ioanna Andreadou; Manuela Aragno; Christophe Beauloye; Luc Bertrand; Antigone Lazou; Ines Falcão-Pires; Robert Bell; Coert J Zuurbier; Pasquale Pagliaro; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning has a Cardioprotective Effect in Children in the Early Postoperative Phase: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wen Tan; Chaoji Zhang; Jianzhou Liu; Xiaofeng Li; Yuzhi Chen; Qi Miao
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 8.  The Role of NMDA Receptors in the Development of Brain Resistance through Pre- and Postconditioning.

Authors:  Leandra Celso Constantino; Carla Inês Tasca; Carina Rodrigues Boeck
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.745

9.  Effect of comprehensive remote ischemic conditioning in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Design and rationale of the CORIC-MI randomized trial.

Authors:  Li Song; Hongbing Yan; Peng Zhou; Hanjun Zhao; Chen Liu; Zhaoxue Sheng; Yu Tan; Chen Yi; Jiannan Li; Jinying Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Remote conditioning or erythropoietin before surgery primes kidneys to clear ischemia-reperfusion-damaged cells: a renoprotective mechanism?

Authors:  David S Gardner; Simon J M Welham; Louise J Dunford; Thomas A McCulloch; Zsolt Hodi; Philippa Sleeman; Saoirse O'Sullivan; Mark A J Devonald
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2014-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.