Literature DB >> 26313328

What automated age estimation of hand and wrist MRI data tells us about skeletal maturation in male adolescents.

Martin Urschler1,2, Sabine Grassegger1,3, Darko Štern2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age estimation of individuals is important in human biology and has various medical and forensic applications. Recent interest in MR-based methods aims to investigate alternatives for established methods involving ionising radiation. Automatic, software-based methods additionally promise improved estimation objectivity. AIM: To investigate how informative automatically selected image features are regarding their ability to discriminate age, by exploring a recently proposed software-based age estimation method for MR images of the left hand and wrist. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and two MR datasets of left hand images are used to evaluate age estimation performance, consisting of bone and epiphyseal gap volume localisation, computation of one age regression model per bone mapping image features to age and fusion of individual bone age predictions to a final age estimate.
RESULTS: Quantitative results of the software-based method show an age estimation performance with a mean absolute difference of 0.85 years (SD = 0.58 years) to chronological age, as determined by a cross-validation experiment. Qualitatively, it is demonstrated how feature selection works and which image features of skeletal maturation are automatically chosen to model the non-linear regression function.
CONCLUSION: Feasibility of automatic age estimation based on MRI data is shown and selected image features are found to be informative for describing anatomical changes during physical maturation in male adolescents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic software; MRI; forensic age estimation; hand and wrist

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26313328     DOI: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1043945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  7 in total

1.  Forensic age estimation based on T1 SE and VIBE wrist MRI: do a one-fits-all staging technique and age estimation model apply?

Authors:  Jannick De Tobel; Elke Hillewig; Michiel Bart de Haas; Bram Van Eeckhout; Steffen Fieuws; Patrick Werner Thevissen; Koenraad Luc Verstraete
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Forensic age estimation based on development of third molars: a staging technique for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J De Tobel; I Phlypo; S Fieuws; C Politis; K L Verstraete; P W Thevissen
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  The influence of motion artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicles for age estimation.

Authors:  Jannick De Tobel; Mayonne van Wijk; Ivo Alberink; Elke Hillewig; Inès Phlypo; Rick R van Rijn; Patrick Werner Thevissen; Koenraad Luc Verstraete; Michiel Bart de Haas
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  How Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Is Assisting Us to Extract Meaning from Data on Bone Mechanics?

Authors:  Saeed Mouloodi; Hadi Rahmanpanah; Colin Martin; Soheil Gohari; Helen M S Davies
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Automated determination of bone age from hand X-rays at the end of puberty and its applicability for age estimation.

Authors:  Hans Henrik Thodberg; Rick R van Rijn; Oskar G Jenni; David D Martin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  An automated technique to stage lower third molar development on panoramic radiographs for age estimation: a pilot study.

Authors:  J De Tobel; P Radesh; D Vandermeulen; P W Thevissen
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  Reducing acquisition time for MRI-based forensic age estimation.

Authors:  Bernhard Neumayer; Matthias Schloegl; Christian Payer; Thomas Widek; Sebastian Tschauner; Thomas Ehammer; Rudolf Stollberger; Martin Urschler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.