Literature DB >> 26312459

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a current meta-analysis.

Jin-qi Song1, Xue-feng Deng1, Yi-min Wang2, Xue-bing Wang1, Xue Li3, Bin Yu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients regarding clinical results, complications, and additional surgeries.
METHODS: Six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical, Ovid, Biosos, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible RCTs published between 1960-2012 comparing operative vs. nonoperative treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures were included. Trial quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Data from included studies were pooled with the use of fixed-effects and random-effects models with mean difference and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for bias in patient selection.
RESULTS: Six studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 287 patients. One hundred fourty-four patients (50.17%) were managed nonoperatively, 20 patients (6.97%) underwent tension band fixation, 55 patients (19.16%) were treated with locked plate, and 68 patients (23.69%) underwent hemiarthroplasty. Mean follow-up ranged from 12-50 months. Results showed no significant difference in post-treatment Constant scores and DASH scores, but conservative treatment showed superior results compared to operative treatment using EQ-5D™. Compared with operative treatment, nonoperative treatment led to significantly fewer complications and additional surgeries. Findings from subgroup analyses remained consistent with these outcomes when compared to nonoperative treatment with tension band fixation, locked plate fixation, and hemiarthroplasty.
CONCLUSION: Compared with operative treatment for closed comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients, conservative treatment can effectively reduce the risk of additional surgeries and complications. However, there is no statistical difference between operative and nonoperative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26312459     DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  5 in total

1.  Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty : Clinical results and functional outcome on retrospective series of patients.

Authors:  I Repetto; M Alessio-Mazzola; P Cerruti; F Sanguineti; M Formica; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-01-24

2.  Assessing the ability of an instrumental variable causal forest algorithm to personalize treatment evidence using observational data: the case of early surgery for shoulder fracture.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Cole G Chapman; Sarah B Floyd; Brian K Chen; Charles A Thigpen; Michael Kissenberth
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Readmission, reoperation, and nonhome discharge rates in patients receiving surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Kenny Ling; Kevin I Kashanchi; Taylor VanHelmond; Alireza Nazemi; Matthew Kim; David E Komatsu; Edward D Wang
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  To operate or not to operate, that is the question: The proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  M Ghert; M McKee
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states.

Authors:  Dominique I Dabija; Hongshu Guan; Andrew Neviaser; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.