Geertje Goedhart1, Hans Kromhout1, Joe Wiart2, Roel Vermeulen3. 1. Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Whist Lab, Institut Mines Telecom and Orange Labs, Paris, France. 3. Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of epidemiological studies on health effects from mobile phone use is hindered by uncertainties in the exposure assessment. We used a newly developed smartphone application (app) to validate self-reported mobile phone use and behaviour among adults. METHODS: 107 participants (mean age 41.4 years) in the Netherlands either downloaded the software app on their smartphone or were provided with a study smartphone for 4 weeks. The app recorded the number and duration of calls, text messages, data transfer, laterality and hands-free use. Self-reported mobile phone use was collected before using the app and after 6 months through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMR, 95% CI) and Spearman correlations (r) of self-reported (after 6 months) versus recorded number and duration of calls were: GMR=0.65 (0.53 to 0.80), r=0.53; and GMR=1.11 (0.86 to 1.42), r=0.57 respectively. Participants held the phone on average for 86% of the total call time near the head. Self-reported right side users held the phone for 70.7% of the total call time on the right side of the head, and left side users for 66.2% on the left side of the head. The percentage of total call time that the use of hands-free devices (headset, speaker mode, Bluetooth) was recorded increased with increasing frequency of reported hands-free device usage. DISCUSSION: The observed recall errors and precision of reported laterality and hands-free use can be used to quantify and improve radiofrequency exposure models based on self-reported mobile phone use. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of epidemiological studies on health effects from mobile phone use is hindered by uncertainties in the exposure assessment. We used a newly developed smartphone application (app) to validate self-reported mobile phone use and behaviour among adults. METHODS: 107 participants (mean age 41.4 years) in the Netherlands either downloaded the software app on their smartphone or were provided with a study smartphone for 4 weeks. The app recorded the number and duration of calls, text messages, data transfer, laterality and hands-free use. Self-reported mobile phone use was collected before using the app and after 6 months through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMR, 95% CI) and Spearman correlations (r) of self-reported (after 6 months) versus recorded number and duration of calls were: GMR=0.65 (0.53 to 0.80), r=0.53; and GMR=1.11 (0.86 to 1.42), r=0.57 respectively. Participants held the phone on average for 86% of the total call time near the head. Self-reported right side users held the phone for 70.7% of the total call time on the right side of the head, and left side users for 66.2% on the left side of the head. The percentage of total call time that the use of hands-free devices (headset, speaker mode, Bluetooth) was recorded increased with increasing frequency of reported hands-free device usage. DISCUSSION: The observed recall errors and precision of reported laterality and hands-free use can be used to quantify and improve radiofrequency exposure models based on self-reported mobile phone use. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Marije Reedijk; Virissa Lenters; Pauline Slottje; Anouk Pijpe; Matti A Rookus; Hans Kromhout; Roel C H Vermeulen; Petra H Peeters; Joke C Korevaar; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; W M Monique Verschuren; Robert A Verheij; Inka Pieterson; Flora E van Leeuwen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mireille B Toledano; Julian Mutz; Martin Röösli; Michael S C Thomas; Iroise Dumontheil; Paul Elliott Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Christopher Brzozek; Kurt K Benke; Berihun M Zeleke; Rodney J Croft; Anna Dalecki; Christina Dimitriadis; Jordy Kaufman; Malcolm R Sim; Michael J Abramson; Geza Benke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anssi Auvinen; Maria Feychting; Anders Ahlbom; Lena Hillert; Paul Elliott; Joachim Schüz; Hans Kromhout; Mireille B Toledano; Christoffer Johansen; Aslak Harbo Poulsen; Roel Vermeulen; Sirpa Heinävaara; Katja Kojo; Giorgio Tettamanti Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Michelle C Turner; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Kim Anderson; David Balshaw; Yuxia Cui; Genevieve Dunton; Jane A Hoppin; Petros Koutrakis; Michael Jerrett Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Christopher Brzozek; Kurt K Benke; Berihun M Zeleke; Michael J Abramson; Geza Benke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 3.390