Literature DB >> 26311465

Anhedonia in pigs? Effects of social stress and restraint stress on sucrose preference.

Jaime Figueroa1, David Solà-Oriol2, Xavier Manteca2, José Francisco Pérez2, Dominic Michael Dwyer3.   

Abstract

The fact that consumption of normally palatable foods is affected by stress in both humans and rats suggests a means to assess hedonic reaction in non-verbal animals. However, little is known about anhedonia and stress in productive animals such as pigs. Thus we examined the separate effects of social stress and restraint stress in 42-day old pigs on the preference for dilute sucrose solutions over water. Pigs in the social stress group (SS) were mixed with unfamiliar animals from separate pens for two 20 minute periods (Experiment 1). Pigs in the restraint stress group (RS) were immobilized three times a day, for 3-min periods, on 3 consecutive days (Experiment 2). Consumption of dilute sucrose solutions and water was examined after these stress manipulations and in the unstressed control groups (CG). Pigs were tested in pairs (12 control and 12 experimental) with a choice between water and sucrose solutions (at either 0.5% or 1%) during 30 min sessions. In both experiments CG pigs showed higher intakes of 0.5% and 1% sucrose solutions over water. Neither SS nor RS pigs consumed more 0.5% sucrose than water, but both groups did consume more 1% sucrose than water. Both social stress and restraint stress reduced sucrose preference at low concentrations but not at higher concentrations suggesting that stress may limit food consumption in pigs unless a palatable feed is present. In addition, the results suggest that stress reduces the hedonic impact of dilute sucrose. Therefore, sucrose preference may be a useful test for the presence of stress and anhedonia in pigs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anhedonia; Pigs; Stress; Sucrose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311465     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework.

Authors:  Jean-Loup Rault; Sara Hintze; Irene Camerlink; Jason Richard Yee
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 2.  Making Sense of Rodent Models of Anhedonia.

Authors:  Simona Scheggi; Maria Graziella De Montis; Carla Gambarana
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.176

3.  Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection.

Authors:  Raúl A Alegría-Morán; Sergio A Guzmán-Pino; Juan Ignacio Egaña; Carem Muñoz; Jaime Figueroa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Exploring Anhedonia in Kennelled Dogs: Could Coping Styles Affect Hedonic Preferences for Sweet and Umami Flavours?

Authors:  Daniela Luna; Carolina Carrasco; Daniela Álvarez; Catalina González; Juan Ignacio Egaña; Jaime Figueroa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Chronic restraint stress produces sex-specific behavioral and molecular outcomes in the dorsal and ventral rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Felipe A Olave; Felipe I Aguayo; Luciano Román-Albasini; Wladimir A Corrales; Juan P Silva; Pablo I González; Sara Lagos; María A García; Matías Alarcón-Mardones; Paulina S Rojas; Xiaojiang Xu; John A Cidlowski; Esteban Aliaga; Jenny Fiedler
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2022-02-25

6.  Pessimistic dairy calves are more vulnerable to pain-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  Benjamin Lecorps; Emeline Nogues; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.