Literature DB >> 26309239

Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Cerura menciana and Comparison with Other Lepidopteran Insects.

Lishang Dai1, Cen Qian1, Congfen Zhang1, Lei Wang1, Guoqing Wei1, Jun Li1, Baojian Zhu1, Chaoliang Liu1.   

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of Cerura menciana (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) was sequenced and analyzed in this study. The mitogenome is a circular molecule of 15,369 bp, containing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and a A+T-rich region. The positive AT skew (0.031) indicated that more As than Ts were present. All PCGs were initiated by ATN codons, except for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene, which was initiated by CAG. Two of the 13 PCGs contained the incomplete termination codon T or TA, while the others were terminated with the stop codon TAA. The A+T-rich region was 372 bp in length and consisted of an 'ATAGA' motif followed by an 18 bp poly-T stretch, a microsatellite-like (AT)8 and a poly-A element upstream of the trnM gene. Results examining codon usage indicated that Asn, Ile, Leu2, Lys, Tyr and Phe were the six most frequently occurring amino acids, while Cys was the rarest. Phylogenetic relationships, analyzed based on the nucleotide sequences of the 13 PCGs from other insect mitogenomes, confirmed that C. menciana belongs to the Notodontidae family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26309239      PMCID: PMC4550444          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The insect mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a circular DNA molecule, 14–19 kb in size [1]. It contains seven NADH dehydrogenase genes (nad1-nad6 and nad4L), three cytochrome c oxidase genes (cox1-cox3), two ATPase genes (atp6 and atp8), one cytochrome b (cob) gene, two ribosomal RNA genes (rrnL and rrnS), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and an adenine (A) + thymine (T)- rich region containing some initiation sites for transcription and replication of the genome [2,3]. MtDNA is maternally inherited and is subject to little if any sequence recombination, and is thus, useful for identifying species and characterizing population genetic structure and molecular evolution [4-7]. The order Lepidoptera contains more than 160,000 described species, classified into 45–48 superfamilies [8]. The superfamily Noctuoidea is the largest with about 42,400 species [4,9]. Despite this huge species diversity, information on the mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of the Noctuoidea is very limited (Table 1). The moth, Cerura menciana (Notodontidae) is a pest of plants such as Salix chaenomeloides and S. babylonica, with two or three generations annually, distributed throughout northeastern China. Previous studies have investigated aspects of host preference and the natural enemies of C. menciana [10,11]. Characterization of the mitogenome of C. menciana will facilitate further insight into the evolutionary relationships of lepidopteran insects, especially in gene rearrangements. In this study, we characterize the complete mitogenome sequence of C. menciana and compared this with the mitogenome of other lepidopteran species.
Table 1

Details of the lepidopteran mitogenomes used in this study.

SubfamilyFamilySpeciesSize (bp)Accession numberReference
NoctuoideaNoctuidae Spodoptera litura 15,383KF701043[23]
Agrotis ipsilon 15,377KF163965[37]
Lymantriidae Lymantria dispar 15,569NC_012893Unpublished
Erebidae Hyphantria cunea 15,481GU592049[38]
Notodontidae Amata formosae 15,463KC513737[4]
Ochrogaster lunifer 15,593AM946601[5]
BombycoideaBombycidae Phalera flavescens 15,659JF440342[24]
C. menciana Moore 15,369This study
Bombyx mori 15,643NC_002355Unpublished
Bombyx mandarina 15,682AY301620[25]
Saturniidae Actias selene 15,236NC_018133[21]
Antheraea pernyi 15,566AY242996[29]
Eriogyna pyretorum 15,327FJ685653[1]
PyraloideaCrambidae Tyspanodes hypsalis 15,329NC_025569[39]
Pyralidae Lista haraldusalis 15,213NC_024535[40]
TortricoideaTortricidae Cydia pomonella 15,253JX407107[41]
Grapholita dimorpha 15,831KJ671625[42]
GelechioideaOecophoridae Endrosis sarcitrella 15,317KJ508037[43]
PapilionoideaPapilionidae Luehdorfia taibai 15,553KC952673[44]
Nymphalidae Apatura ilia 15,242NC_016062[45]

Materials and Methods

Experimental insects and DNA extraction

C. menciana larvae of both sexes were collected from willow trees within the campus of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei city, China. The owner of the land gave permission to conduct the study on this site and the work did not involve endangered or protected species. Total genomic DNA was extracted from larvae using the Aidlab Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab Co., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was examined on a 1% agarose gel and used for PCR amplification of the complete mitogenome.

PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing

To amplify the whole mitogenome of C. menciana, we designed thirteen pairs of universal primers according to published mitogenomes from other Notodontidae insects, which were then synthesized by SangonBiotech Co., Shanghai, China (Table 2). All PCRs were performed in a 50 μL reaction volume, including 35 μL sterilized distilled water, 5 μL 10 × Taq buffer (Mg2+ plus), 4 μL dNTP (25 mM), 1.5 μL DNA, 2 μL each primer (10 μM) and 0.5 μL (1 unit) Taq (Aidlab Co., Beijing, China). The PCR was performed under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 40 s at 49–58°C (depending on primer combination), 1–3 min (depending on putative length of the fragments) at 72°C, and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min.
Table 2

Details of the primers used to amplify the mitogenome of C. menciana.

Primer pairPrimer sequence (5’ →3’)
F1 TAAAAATAAGCTAAATTTAAGCTT
R1 TATTAAAATTGCAAATTTTAAGGA
F2 AAACTAATAATCTTCAAAATTAT
R2 AAAATAATTTGTTCTATTAAAG
F3 ATTCTATATTTCTTGAAATATTAT
R3 CATAAATTATAAATCTTAATCATA
F4 TGAAAATGATAAGTAATTTATTT
R4 AATATTAATGGAATTTAACCACTA
F5 TAAGCTGCTAACTTAATTTTTAGT
R5 CCTGTTTCAGCTTTAGTTCATTC
F6 CCTAATTGTCTTAAAGTAGATAA
R6 TGCTTATTCTTCTGTAGCTCATAT
F7 TAATGTATAATCTTCGTCTATGTAA
R7 ATCAATAATCTCCAAAATTATTAT
F8 ACTTTAAAAACTTCAAAGAAAAA
R8 TCATAATAAATTCCTCGTCCAATAT
F9 GTAAATTATGGTTGATTAATTCG
R9 TGATCTTCAAATTCTAATTATGC
F10 CCGAAACTAACTCTCTCTCACCT
R10 CTTACATGATCTGAGTTCAAACCG
F11 CGTTCTAATAAAGTTAAATAAGCA
R11 AATATGTACATATTGCCCGTCGCT
F12 TCTAGAAACACTTTCCAGTACCTC
R12 AATTTTAAATTATTAGGTGAAATT
F13 TAATAGGGTATCTAATCCTAGTT
R13 ACTTAATTTATCCTATCAGAATAA
PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel and purified using a DNA gel extraction kit (Transgen Co., Beijing, China). The purified PCR fragments were ligated into the T-vector (TaKaRa Co., Dalian, China) and then transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α. Recombinants were cultured overnight at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) solid medium containing Ampicillin (AMP), isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). White colonies carrying insert DNA were selected, grown overnight in liquid media, and then sequenced at least three times by Invitrogen Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Sequence assembly and gene annotation

The final consensus sequence of the mtDNA of C. menciana was performed using the SeqMan II program from the Lasergene software package (DNAStar Inc., Madison, USA). Sequence annotation was performed using the online blast tools in NCBI website (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast). The nucleotide sequences of the PCGs were initially translated into putative proteins on the basis of the invertebrate mtDNA genetic code. These exact initiation and termination codons were identified in ClustalX version 2.0 using reference sequences from other lepidopteran insects. To describe the base composition of nucleotide sequences, we calculated composition skewness as described by Junqueira [12]: AT skew = [A−T]/[A+T], GC skew = [G−C]/[G+C]. The Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) values were calculated using MEGA 5.0 [13]. The overlapping regions and intergenic spacers between genes were counted manually. The tRNA genes were verified using either program tRNAscan-SE Search with the default settings [14] or by manually identifying sequences with the appropriate anticodon capable of folding into the typical cloverleaf secondary structure. Tandem repeats in the A+T-rich region were found with the Tandem Repeats Finder program (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) [15].

Phylogenetic analysis

Twenty lepidopteran mitogenomes were downloaded from GenBank to illustrate the phylogenetic relationships among lepidoptera insects. The mitogenomes of Drosophila incompta (NC_025936) [16] and Anopheles gambiae (NC_002084) [17] were downloaded and used as outgroups. The multiple alignments of the 13 PCG concatenated nucleotide sequences of these lepidopteran mitogenomes was conducted using ClustalX version 2.0. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) method with the MEGA 5.0 program [13].

Results and Discussion

Genome structure, organization and composition

We report that the complete mitogenome of C. menciana is a circular molecule of 15,369 bp in size (Fig 1). This is within the range for similar organisms: 15,236 in Actias selene to 15,831 in Grapholita dimorpha. The mitogenome contains the typical gene content observed in metazoan mitogenomes: containing 22 tRNA genes, 13 PCGs (nad1-6, nad4L, cox1-3, cob, atp6 and atp8), two rRNAs (rrnS and rrnL), and an A+T-rich region (Table 3). Gene order and orientation of C. menciana was trnM-trnI-trnQ, which differs from the ancestral order trnI-trnQ-trnM [18]. The nucleotide composition is highly A+T biased (A: 41.28%, T: 38.78%, G: 7.61%, C: 12.32%; Table 4). This is within the range for similar species (A+T bias of 77.84% in Ochrogaster lunifer and 81.59% in Chinese Bombyx mandarina). The positive AT skew we observed (0.031) indicates the occurrence of more As than Ts, similar to other lepidopterans, including Lymantria dispar (0.016), Hyphantria cunea (0.010), O. lunifer (0.030), Chinese B. mandarina (0.057). Lepidopteran mitogenomes exhibit negative GC skewness ranging in size from -0.172 to -0.318 (Table 4). The GC skewness of C. menciana mitogenome rRNA was far lower than this range (−0.416; Table 4), indicating a particularly heavy bias toward Cs and against Gs in the rRNA. This phenomenon is known from other lepidopteran insects [1,19-21].
Fig 1

Map of the mitogenome of C. menciana.

The tRNA genes are labeled according to the IUPAC-IUB single-letter amino acids: cox1, cox2 and cox3 refer to the cytochrome c oxidase subunits; cob refers to cytochrome b; nad1-nad6 refer to NADH dehydrogenase components; rrnL and rrnS refer to ribosomal RNAs. Gene named above the bar are located on major strand, while the others are located on minor strand.

Table 3

Summary results for characteristics of the mitogenome of C. menciana.

GeneDirectionLocationSizeAnticodonStart codonStop codonIntergenic Nucleotides *
trnM F1–6868 CAT 0
trnI F69–13466 GAT -3
trnQ R132–20069 TTG 57
nad2 F258–12711014 ATT TAA 17
trnW F1289–136173 TCA -8
trnC R1354–142269 GCA 2
trnY R1425–149066 GTA 5
cox1 F1496–30261531 CGA T 0
trnL2(UUR) F3027–309367 TAA 0
cox2 F3094–3775682 ATG T 0
trnK F3776–384671 CTT -1
trnD F3846–391167 GTC 0
atp8 F3912–4070159 ATC TAA -7
atp6 F4064–4741678 ATG TAA -1
cox3 F4741–5529789 ATG TAA 2
trnG F5532–559766 TCC 0
nad3 F5598–5951354 ATC TAA 53
trnA F6005–607470 TGC -1
trnR F6074–613764 TCG 3
trnN F6141–620565 GTT 1
trnS1(AGN) F6207–627670 GCT 1
trnE F6278–634568 TTC -2
trnF R6344–641067 GAA -2
nad5 R6409–81521744 ATT TAA -2
trnH R8151–821666 GTG -2
nad4 R8215–95571339 ATA TA -4
nad4L R9554–9841288 ATT TAA 14
trnT F9856–992065 TGT 0
trnP R9921–998565 TGG 8
nad6 F9994–10,524531 ATT TAA 13
cob F10,539–11,6871149 ATG TAA 4
trnS2(UCN) F11,692–11,75867 TGA 18
nad1 R11,777–12,716940 ATT TAA 7
trnL1(CUN) R12,724–12,79471 TAG 0
rrnL R12,795–14,15213580
trnV R14,153–14,21967 TAC 0
rrnS R14,220–14,9987790
A+T-rich Region14,999–15,370372
Table 4

Composition and skewness in different Lepidopteran mitogenomes.

SpeciesSize (bp) A% G% T% C% A+T % ATskewness GCskewness
Whole genome
C. menciana 15,369 41.28 7.61 38.78 12.32 80.06 0.031 -0.236
A. ipsilon 15,37740.387.7140.8711.0481.25-0.006-0.178
L. dispar 15,56940.587.5739.3012.5579.880.016-0.248
H. cunea 15,48140.587.5539.8112.0680.390.010-0.230
A. formosae 15,45338.677.5340.8312.9879.49-0.027-0.266
O. lunifer 15,59340.097.5637.7514.6077.840.030-0.318
P. flavescens 15,65940.077.8740.8011.2680.87-0.009-0.177
B. mandarina 15,68243.117.4038.4811.0181.590.057-0.196
A. selene 15,23638.548.0540.3713.0378.91-0.023-0.236
A. pernyi 15,56639.227.7740.9412.0780.16-0.021-0.216
E. pyretorum 15,32739.177.6341.6511.5580.82-0.031-0.204
T. hypsalis 15,32940.007.6741.4210.9281.41-0.017-0.175
L. haraldusalis 15,21340.477.6641.0410.8381.52-0.007-0.172
C. pomonella 15,25339.927.8840.2111.9980.13-0.004-0.207
G. dimorpha 15,83139.997.7740.8511.3980.84-0.011-0.189
L. taibai 15,55340.377.3941.1011.1481.46-0.009-0.202
A. ilia 15,24239.777.7540.6811.8080.45-0.011-0.207
PCG
C. menciana 11,190 40.68 8.40 37.72 13.20 78.42 0.038 -0.222
A. ipsilon 11,22639.698.4440.1411.7279.83-0.006-0.163
L. dispar 11,22739.678.4438.1613.7377.830.019-0.239
H. cunea 11,19839.988.3538.6113.0678.590.017-0.220
A. formosae 11,21738.188.2839.6213.9277.80-0.019-0.254
O. lunifer 11,26632.4712.0843.2612.1975.73-0.142-0.004
P. flavescens 11,20639.408.9039.5612.1578.96-0.002-0.154
B. mandarina 11,19642.838.2637.0411.8779.870.072-0.179
A. selene 11,23137.938.7439.4413.8977.37-0.020-0.228
A. pernyi 11,20439.227.7740.9412.0780.16-0.021-0.216
E. pyretorum 11,22833.1810.5046.2310.0979.41-0.1640.020
T. hypsalis 11,18839.318.4640.6611.5779.97-0.017-0.155
L. haraldusalis 11,19339.888.4740.1611.4980.04-0.003-0.151
C. pomonella 11,19939.558.6939.0012.7678.550.007-0.190
G. dimorpha 11,23239.518.8139.1812.4978.690.004-0.173
L. taibai 11,17839.568.2640.1812.0179.74-0.008-0.185
A. ilia 11,14839.418.4139.4912.6978.89-0.001-0.203
tRNA
C. menciana 1472 42.12 7.81 40.01 10.05 82.13 0.026 -0.125
A. ipsilon 146541.238.1240.4810.1781.710.014-0.112
L. dispar 145941.607.9539.4810.9781.080.026-0.160
H. cunea 146341.837.8639.9910.3281.820.022-0.135
A. formosae 145740.437.9640.3611.2680.780.001-0.172
O. lunifer 166641.787.3239.8611.0481.630.023-0.202
P. flavescens 147441.667.8040.649.9182.290.012-0.119
B. mandarina 147241.787.8139.9510.4681.730.022-0.145
A. selene 145940.378.1640.2311.2480.600.002-0.159
A. pernyi 145939.227.7740.9412.0780.16-0.021-0.216
E. pyretorum 142442.5910.6139.357.4581.940.0390.174
T. hypsalis 145640.737.9041.3510.0382.07-0.008-0.119
L. haraldusalis 145141.087.8641.429.6582.49-0.004-0.102
C. pomonella 145141.147.9340.3210.6181.460.010-0.145
G. dimorpha 145141.018.0640.5210.4181.530.006-0.127
L. taibai 144041.397.8540.909.8682.290.006-0.113
A. ilia 143340.618.3040.9610.1281.58-0.004-0.099
rRNA
C. menciana 2137 42.82 4.73 40.99 11.46 83.81 0.022 -0.416
A. ipsilon 216241.585.0043.579.8585.15-0.023-0.327
L. dispar 215042.794.7941.8110.6084.600.012-0.377
H. cunea 223442.084.9242.7510.2584.83-0.008-0.351
A. formosae 216338.934.7244.8511.5183.77-0.071-0.418
O. lunifer 215741.964.8240.1913.0382.150.022-0.460
P. flavescens 219841.314.7344.049.9285.35-0.032-0.354
B. mandarina 213443.864.7841.0510.3184.910.028-0.366
A. selene 212639.934.9943.7911.2983.73-0.046-0.387
A. pernyi 214439.227.7740.9412.0780.16-0.021-0.216
E. pyretorum 211641.164.8243.3810.6384.55-0.026-0.376
T. hypsalis 215642.024.9243.099.9785.11-0.013-0.339
L. haraldusalis 212142.204.6743.339.8185.53-0.013-0.355
C. pomonella 214740.485.0343.9210.5784.40-0.041-0.355
G. dimorpha 218141.134.9543.8310.0984.96-0.032-0.342
L. taibai 180542.165.3741.8310.6483.990.004-0.329
A. ilia 210940.114.9844.8610.0584.97-0.056-0.337
A+T-rich region
C. menciana 372 44.35 2.42 50.00 3.23 94.35 -0.060 -0.143
A. ipsilon 33246.081.5148.803.6194.88-0.029-0.410
L. dispar 43540.587.5739.3012.5579.880.016-0.248
H. cunea 35745.661.1249.303.9294.96-0.038-0.556
A. formosae 48242.952.9049.794.3692.74-0.074-0.201
O. lunifer 31944.51.648.95.093.4-0.047-0.524
P. flavescens 54142.142.2249.725.9191.87-0.083-0.454
B. mandarina 48446.492.6947.932.8994.42-0.015-0.036
A. selene 33943.075.9044.846.1987.91-0.020-0.024
A. pernyi 55239.227.7740.9412.0780.16-0.021-0.216
E. pyretorum 35842.182.5150.005.3192.18-0.085-0.358
T. hypsalis 35043.431.1452.003.4395.43-0.090-0.501
L. haraldusalis 31045.810.9750.322.9096.13-0.047-0.499
C. pomonella 35143.301.1452.423.1395.73-0.095-0.466
G. dimorpha 84841.631.3054.832.2496.46-0.137-0.266
L. taibai 93945.151.7049.413.7394.57-0.045-0.374
A. ilia 40342.933.2349.634.2292.56-0.072-0.133

Map of the mitogenome of C. menciana.

The tRNA genes are labeled according to the IUPAC-IUB single-letter amino acids: cox1, cox2 and cox3 refer to the cytochrome c oxidase subunits; cob refers to cytochrome b; nad1-nad6 refer to NADH dehydrogenase components; rrnL and rrnS refer to ribosomal RNAs. Gene named above the bar are located on major strand, while the others are located on minor strand.

Protein-coding genes and codon usage

We found that the 13 Protein-Coding Genes of C. menciana were 11,190 bp in length and accounted for 72.81% of the whole mitochondrial genome. Nine of these PCGs (nad2, cox1, cox2, atp8, atp6, cox3, nad3, nad6 and cob) were coded by the H-strand, while the remaining four PCGs (nad5, nad4, nad4L and nad1) were coded by the L-strand. The AT skew was positive (0.038) indicating the occurrence of more As than Ts. All PCGs started with the canonical putative start codons ATN except for the cox1 gene which started with CGA instead, similar to other lepidopterans [22,23]. Ten genes shared complete termination codon TAA, while three genes used incomplete stop codons (a single T for cox1 and cox2, TA for nad4). The single T as a stop codon for cox1 and cox2 has been reported in the majority of the sequenced lepidopteran mitogenomes, and even in some mammalian mitochondrial genes [20,22]. A comparison of the codon usage of eight mitochondrial genomes from the Lepidoptera reveals they are divided into five superfamilies: four species belonging to Noctuoidea, and four belonging to Bombycoidea, Pyraloidea, Tortricoidea, and Papilionoidea (Fig 2). Our results indicated that Asn, Ile, Leu2, Lys, Tyr and Phe were the six most frequently present amino acids, while Cys was rare. Codon distributions of four species in Noctuoidea are consistency and each amino acid has equal content in different species (Fig 3). All codons were present in the PCGs of the C. menciana mitogenome (Fig 4). This was similar to L. dispar, A. selene and Tyspanodes hypsalis, but differed from A. ipsilon, H. cunea, C. pomonella and Luehdorfia taibai, which lacked the codons GCG&GGC, GCG&GTG, GCG, CGG&CAG&GTG, respectively. Codons with a high GC content are abandoned in other some lepidopteran insects [4,24].
Fig 2

Comparison of codon usage within the mitochondrial genome of members of the Lepidoptera.

Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d and e) above species name represent the superfamily to which the species belongs (a: Noctuoidea, b: Bombycoidea, c: Pyraloidea, d: Tortricoidea, e: Papilionoidea).

Fig 3

Codon distribution in members of the Lepidoptera.

CDspT = codons per thousand codons.

Fig 4

The Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) of the mitochondrial genome of five superfamilies in the Lepidoptera.

Codon families are plotted on the X axis. Codons indicated above the bar are not present in the mitogenome.

Comparison of codon usage within the mitochondrial genome of members of the Lepidoptera.

Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d and e) above species name represent the superfamily to which the species belongs (a: Noctuoidea, b: Bombycoidea, c: Pyraloidea, d: Tortricoidea, e: Papilionoidea).

Codon distribution in members of the Lepidoptera.

CDspT = codons per thousand codons.

The Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) of the mitochondrial genome of five superfamilies in the Lepidoptera.

Codon families are plotted on the X axis. Codons indicated above the bar are not present in the mitogenome.

Ribosomal RNA and transfer RNA genes

The rrnL and rrnS gene in C. menciana were located between trnL1 (CUN) and trnV, and between trnV and the A+T-rich region, respectively. The rrnL was 1358 bp while rrnS was 779 bp. The A+T content of the two rRNA genes totaled 83.81%, which is within the previously range (80.16% in Antheraea pernyi to 85.53% in Lista haraldusalis; Table 3). The AT skew was positive (0.022), while the GC skew was negative (-0.416), similar to that reported for other sequenced lepidopteran mitogenomes [5,25]. The C. menciana mitogenome harbored 22 tRNA genes, ranging from 64 bp (trnR) to 73 bp (trnW). Fourteen genes were encoded on the H-strand with the rest on the L-strand (Table 3). The tRNA genes were also highly A+T biased (82.13%) and exhibited positive AT-skew (0.026; Table 4). All the tRNAs could be folded into the expected secondary cloverleaf structures except the trnS1 (AGN) gene (Fig 5). In the trnS1 (AGN) gene; its dihydrouridine (DHU) arm simply forms a loop, as is often found in several other insect mitogenomes [26-28]. Ten unmatched base pairs of G-U occurred in C. menciana mitochondrial tRNA genes. In addition, the trnA contained a U-U mismatch in the acceptor stem. All of mismatches were located in the acceptor, DHU and anticodon stems. The mismatches were scattered among 10 of the 22 C. menciana tRNA genes, including trnA, trnC, trnQ, trnG, trnL1 (CUN), trnL2 (UUR), trnF, trnP, trnS1 (AGN) and trnV (Fig 5). All of the secondary structures were drawn by the RNAstructure program.
Fig 5

Putative secondary structures of the 22 tRNA genes of the C. menciana mitogenome.

Overlapping and intergenic spacer regions

Eleven overlapping sequences with a total length of 33 bp were identified in the C. menciana mitogenome. These sequences varied in length from 1 bp to 8 bp with the longest overlapping region present between trnW and trnC (Table 3). Other overlap regions included 7 bp between atp8 and atp6, 4 bp between nad4 and nad4L, 3 bp between the trnI and trnQ, with all other overlapping sequences shorter than 3 bp (Table 3). The 7-bp overlap between atp8 and atp6 is common in many Lepidoptera mitogenomes [29,30]. The intergenic spacers of C. menciana mitogenomes, spread over 15 regions and ranged in size from 1 bp to 57 bp with a total length of 205 bp. The longest spacer (57 bp) was extremely A+T rich and occurred between trnQ and nad2. Intergenic spacers in C. menciana were shorter than those in O. lunifer (371 bp over 20 regions) but longer than those in A. selene (137 bp over 13 regions) [5,21]. The 18 bp spacer region between trnS2 (UCN) and nad1 contained the ‘ATACTAA’ motif. This 7 bp motif is a common feature amongst the 11 species of different families we selected, indicating that this region is conserved and present in most insect mtDNAs (Fig 6A).
Fig 6

(A) Alignment of the intergenic spacer region between trnS2 (UCN) and ND1 of several Lepidopteran insects. The shaded ‘ATACTAA’ motif is conserved across the Lepidoptera order. (B) Features present in the A+T-rich region of C. menciana. The sequence is shown in the reverse strand. The ATATG motif is shaded. The poly-T stretch is underlined while the poly-A stretch is double underlined. The single microsatellite T/A repeat sequence is indicated by dotted underlining.

(A) Alignment of the intergenic spacer region between trnS2 (UCN) and ND1 of several Lepidopteran insects. The shaded ‘ATACTAA’ motif is conserved across the Lepidoptera order. (B) Features present in the A+T-rich region of C. menciana. The sequence is shown in the reverse strand. The ATATG motif is shaded. The poly-T stretch is underlined while the poly-A stretch is double underlined. The single microsatellite T/A repeat sequence is indicated by dotted underlining.

The A+T-rich region

The 372 bp (14,999–15,370 nt) A+T-rich region was located between the rrnS and trnM genes. This region is longer in C. menciana than in A. ipsilon (332 bp), H. cunea (357 bp), A. selene (339 bp), O. lunifer (319 bp), Eriogyna pyretorum (358 bp), T. hypsalis (350 bp), L. haraldusalis (310 bp) and Cydia pomonella (351 bp), but shorter than L. dispar (435 bp), Amata formosae (482 bp), Phalera flavescens (541 bp), A. pernyi (552 bp) and Apatura ilia (403 bp). The A+T-rich region harbors the highest A+T content (94.35%), most negative AT skew (-0.060) and most negative GC skew (-0.143). The presence of multiple tandem repeat elements has been reported to be a characteristic of the insect A+T-rich region [31]. For example, in M. separate, the A+T-rich region contains a duplicate 51 bp repeat element that occurs twice [8], while in Cnaphalocrocis medinalis there is a duplicated 25 bp repeat element and in Chilo suppressalis a duplicated 31 bp repeat element [32]. We found no conspicuous long repeats in the A+T-rich region of C. menciana. We did find several short repeating sequences scattered throughout the entire region, including the motif ‘ATAGA’ followed by an 18 bp poly-T stretch, a microsatellite-like (AT)8 and a poly-A element upstream of trnM gene (Fig 6B). These sequences are similar to those found in the genomes of other lepidopteran insects [21,33-35]. In addition, the presence of extra tRNA-like structures in the A+T-rich region has been reported in the lepidopteran insects, such as Chinese B. mandarina [31]. In this study, however, we did not detect a tRNA-like structure in the C. menciana A+T-rich region.

Phylogenetic relationships

We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships among the seven superfamilies of lepidopteran using Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of the 13 PCGs. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that different species from the same family clustered together (Fig 7). The phylogenetic analyses also showed that C. menciana was most closely related to P. flavescent of the Notodontidae family. Noctuoidea is closely related to Bombycoidea and Geometroidea, but Hepialoidea was a sister group to the other superfamilies. This result is consistent with that described in previous research [4,36]. Further studies using larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these phylogenetic relationships.
Fig 7

Tree showing the phylogenetic relationships among Lepidopteran insects, constructed using Maximum Likelihood method.

Bootstrap values (1000 repetitions) of the branches are indicated. Drosophila incompta (NC_025936) and Anopheles gambiae (NC_002084) were used as outgroups.

Tree showing the phylogenetic relationships among Lepidopteran insects, constructed using Maximum Likelihood method.

Bootstrap values (1000 repetitions) of the branches are indicated. Drosophila incompta (NC_025936) and Anopheles gambiae (NC_002084) were used as outgroups.
  39 in total

1.  The complete mitochondrial genome of Lista haraldusalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Fei Ye; Hai-Li Yu; Peng-Fei Li; Ping You
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA       Date:  2014-01-10

2.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Complete mitochondrial genome of Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Authors:  Jiao Yin; Ai-Min Wang; Gui-Yun Hong; Ya-Zhong Cao; Zhao-Jun Wei
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA       Date:  2011-06

Review 4.  Mitochondrial transcription initiation. Variation and conservation.

Authors:  G S Shadel; D A Clayton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-08-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Complete mitogenome of the Lesser Purple Emperor Apatura ilia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Apaturinae) and comparison with other nymphalid butterflies.

Authors:  Mei Chen; Li-Li Tian; Qing-Hui Shi; Tian-Wen Cao; Jia-Sheng Hao
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2012-04

6.  Mitochondrial genome of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and comparison with other Lepidopterans.

Authors:  Jiao Yin; Gui-Yun Hong; Ai-Min Wang; Ya-Zhong Cao; Zhao-Jun Wei
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA       Date:  2010-10

7.  Characterization of mitochondrial genome of Chinese wild mulberry silkworm, Bomyx mandarina (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae).

Authors:  Minhui Pan; Quanyou Yu; Yuling Xia; Fangyin Dai; Yanqun Liu; Cheng Lu; Ze Zhang; Zhonghuai Xiang
Journal:  Sci China C Life Sci       Date:  2008-08-03

8.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrion genome of diurnal Moth Amata emma (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) and its phylogenetic implications.

Authors:  Hui-Fen Lu; Tian-Juan Su; A-Rong Luo; Chao-Dong Zhu; Chun-Sheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the giant silkworm moth, Eriogyna pyretorum (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae).

Authors:  Shao-Tong Jiang; Gui-Yun Hong; Miao Yu; Na Li; Ying Yang; Yan-Qun Liu; Zhao-Jun Wei
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the bag-shelter moth Ochrogaster lunifer (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae).

Authors:  Paola Salvato; Mauro Simonato; Andrea Battisti; Enrico Negrisolo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  The first complete mitochondrial genome for the subfamily Limacodidae and implications for the higher phylogeny of Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Qiu-Ning Liu; Zhao-Zhe Xin; Dan-Dan Bian; Xin-Yue Chai; Chun-Lin Zhou; Bo-Ping Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Leucoma salicis (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and Comparison with Other Lepidopteran Insects.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Sun; Lei Wang; Guo-Qing Wei; Cen Qian; Li-Shang Dai; Yu Sun; Muhammad Nadeem Abbas; Bao-Jian Zhu; Chao-Liang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparative mitochondrial genome analysis of Daphnis nerii and other lepidopteran insects reveals conserved mitochondrial genome organization and phylogenetic relationships.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Chen Chen; Jin Gao; Muhammad Nadeem Abbas; Saima Kausar; Cen Qian; Lei Wang; Guoqing Wei; Bao-Jian Zhu; Chao-Liang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the Papilio paris (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae).

Authors:  Yu Sun; Hua Huang; Xiaojuan Zhang; Jun Xia; Jian Geng; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 0.658

5.  Unfolding the mitochondrial genome structure of green semilooper (Chrysodeixis acuta Walker): An emerging pest of onion (Allium cepa L.).

Authors:  Soumia P S; Dhananjay V Shirsat; Ram Krishna; Guru Pirasanna Pandi G; Jaipal S Choudhary; Naiyar Naaz; Karuppaiah V; Pranjali A Gedam; Anandhan S; Major Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Organization of the mitochondrial genome of Ramulus irregulatiter dentatus (Phasmatidae: Phasmatidae).

Authors:  Congfen Zhang; Xiaoqiang Guo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Orthaga olivacea Warre (Lepidoptera Pyralidae) and comparison with other Lepidopteran insects.

Authors:  Liangli Yang; Junjun Dai; Qiuping Gao; Guozhen Yuan; Jiang Liu; Yu Sun; Yuxuan Sun; Lei Wang; Cen Qian; Baojian Zhu; Chaoliang Liu; Guoqing Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The complete mitochondrial genome of Dysgonia stuposa (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) and phylogenetic relationships within Noctuoidea.

Authors:  Yuxuan Sun; Yeshu Zhu; Chen Chen; Qunshan Zhu; Qianqian Zhu; Yanyue Zhou; Xiaojun Zhou; Peijun Zhu; Jun Li; Haijun Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Mitochondrial genome sequencing and phylogeny of Haemagogus albomaculatus, Haemagogus leucocelaenus, Haemagogus spegazzinii, and Haemagogus tropicalis (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Fábio Silva da Silva; Ana Cecília Ribeiro Cruz; Daniele Barbosa de Almeida Medeiros; Sandro Patroca da Silva; Márcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes; Lívia Carício Martins; Jannifer Oliveira Chiang; Poliana da Silva Lemos; Gabriel Muricy Cunha; Renato Freitas de Araujo; Hamilton Antônio de Oliveira Monteiro; Joaquim Pinto Nunes Neto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comprehensive Analyses of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Figulus binodulus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae).

Authors:  Jungmo Lee; Jonghyun Park; Hong Xi; Jongsun Park
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.