BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Comparative studies of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson disease (PD) rarely considered how one should deliver the intervention. The objective of this study was to compare the success of exercise when administered by (1) home exercise program, (2) individualized physical therapy, or (3) a group class. We examined if common comorbidities associated with PD impacted success of each intervention. METHODS:Fifty-eight people (age = 63.9 ± 8 years) with PD participated. People were randomized into (1) home exercise program, (2) individual physical therapy, or (3) group class intervention. All arms were standardized and based on the Agility Boot Camp exercise program for PD, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 7-item Physical Performance Test. Other measures of balance, gait, mobility, quality of life, balance confidence, depressions, apathy, self-efficacy and UPDRS-Motor, and activity of daily living scores were included. RESULTS: Only the individual group significantly improved in the Physical Performance Test. The individual exercise showed the most improvements in functional and balance measures, whereas the group class showed the most improvements in gait. The home exercise program improved the least across all outcomes. Several factors effected success, particularly for the home group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: An unsupervised, home exercise program is the least effective way to deliver exercise to people with PD, and individual and group exercises have differing benefits. Furthermore, people with PD who also have other comorbidities did better in a program directly supervised by a physical therapist.Video Abstract available for additional insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A112).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Comparative studies of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson disease (PD) rarely considered how one should deliver the intervention. The objective of this study was to compare the success of exercise when administered by (1) home exercise program, (2) individualized physical therapy, or (3) a group class. We examined if common comorbidities associated with PD impacted success of each intervention. METHODS: Fifty-eight people (age = 63.9 ± 8 years) with PD participated. People were randomized into (1) home exercise program, (2) individual physical therapy, or (3) group class intervention. All arms were standardized and based on the Agility Boot Camp exercise program for PD, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 7-item Physical Performance Test. Other measures of balance, gait, mobility, quality of life, balance confidence, depressions, apathy, self-efficacy and UPDRS-Motor, and activity of daily living scores were included. RESULTS: Only the individual group significantly improved in the Physical Performance Test. The individual exercise showed the most improvements in functional and balance measures, whereas the group class showed the most improvements in gait. The home exercise program improved the least across all outcomes. Several factors effected success, particularly for the home group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: An unsupervised, home exercise program is the least effective way to deliver exercise to people with PD, and individual and group exercises have differing benefits. Furthermore, people with PD who also have other comorbidities did better in a program directly supervised by a physical therapist.Video Abstract available for additional insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A112).
Authors: Claire L Tomlinson; Smitaa Patel; Charmaine Meek; Carl E Clarke; Rebecca Stowe; Laila Shah; Catherine M Sackley; Katherine H O Deane; Clare P Herd; Keith Wheatley; Natalie Ives Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-07-11
Authors: Madaline B Harrison; Scott A Wylie; Robert C Frysinger; James T Patrie; Diane S Huss; Lillian J Currie; G Frederick Wooten Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Cindy Zadikoff; Susan H Fox; David F Tang-Wai; Teri Thomsen; Rob M A de Bie; Pettarusup Wadia; Janis Miyasaki; Sarah Duff-Canning; Anthony E Lang; Connie Marras Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: L A King; A Salarian; M Mancini; K C Priest; J Nutt; A Serdar; J Wilhelm; J Schlimgen; M Smith; F B Horak Journal: Parkinsons Dis Date: 2013-04-30
Authors: Kerri S Rawson; Marie E McNeely; Ryan P Duncan; Kristen A Pickett; Joel S Perlmutter; Gammon M Earhart Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Jojo Yan Yan Kwok; Robert Smith; Lily Man Lee Chan; Leo Chun Chung Lam; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Edmond Pui Hang Choi; Kris Yuet Wan Lok; Jung Jae Lee; Man Auyeung; Bastiaan R Bloem Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Jacqueline A Osborne; Rachel Botkin; Cristina Colon-Semenza; Tamara R DeAngelis; Oscar G Gallardo; Heidi Kosakowski; Justin Martello; Sujata Pradhan; Miriam Rafferty; Janet L Readinger; Abigail L Whitt; Terry D Ellis Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Terry D Ellis; Cristina Colón-Semenza; Tamara R DeAngelis; Cathi A Thomas; Marie-Hélène Saint Hilaire; Gammon M Earhart; Leland E Dibble Journal: Semin Neurol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.420