Literature DB >> 26307329

Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Epilepsy.

George Nune1, Christopher DeGiorgio, Christianne Heck.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Neuromodulation devices are used in the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. This has been defined as epilepsy with persistent seizures despite adequate trials of at least two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). In most cases of medically refractory partial epilepsy, the first choice of treatment is resective surgery if the seizure focus can be definitively localized and if surgery can be safely performed without causing intolerable neurologic deficits. Patients with medically refractory epilepsy who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery may benefit from the implantation of a neuromodulation device. While most of these devices require surgical implantation, they provide a significant added seizure reduction without typical medication side effects. Furthermore, the efficacy of these devices continues to improve over years. There are currently no head-to-head trials comparing the different neuromodulation devices but efficacy appears to be roughly similar. The choice of device therefore depends on the type of epilepsy, whether the seizure focus can be identified, and other clinical factors. Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) does not require identification of the seizure focus and also carries an FDA indication for depression. While in the United States VNS is only approved for use in partial epilepsy, it is commonly used off-label to treat generalized seizures as well. VNS delivers stimulation on a scheduled basis, in response to patient activation, or in response to heart rate increases serving as a proxy for seizures. Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) requires the identification of up to two seizure foci and delivers stimulation only in response to the detection of epileptiform activity. While it requires intracranial placement of electrodes, it allows for long-term monitoring of electrographic seizures and may be effective where VNS has not produced an optimal response. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus is not FDA approved at this time but is available in Europe and many other parts of the world. While it also carries an indication only for partial epilepsy, it does not require identification of the seizure focus and may be particularly helpful for temporal lobe epilepsy. It also appears effective in cases where VNS has not been sufficiently helpful. The Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS) system is another treatment modality which is not yet FDA approved but is available in Europe and other countries. Its mechanism of action is similar to the VNS system and it also appears to have anti-depression effects in addition to anti-epileptic benefits. However, the most compelling feature of TNS is that it is not implanted but rather applied to the skin with transdermal electrodes, typically at night.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26307329     DOI: 10.1007/s11940-015-0375-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol        ISSN: 1092-8480            Impact factor:   3.598


  17 in total

Review 1.  Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: mechanisms, prevalence, and prevention.

Authors:  Rainer Surges; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jerome Engel; Michael P McDermott; Samuel Wiebe; John T Langfitt; John M Stern; Sandra Dewar; Michael R Sperling; Irenita Gardiner; Giuseppe Erba; Itzhak Fried; Margaret Jacobs; Harry V Vinters; Scott Mintzer; Karl Kieburtz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy.

Authors:  Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Early identification of refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  P Kwan; M J Brodie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS > 10 years.

Authors:  Robert E Elliott; Amr Morsi; Omar Tanweer; Bartosz Grobelny; Eric Geller; Chad Carlson; Orrin Devinsky; Werner K Doyle
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 2.937

6.  Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: long-term outcomes and predictors of response.

Authors:  Robert E Elliott; Amr Morsi; Stephen P Kalhorn; Joshua Marcus; Jonathan Sellin; Matthew Kang; Alyson Silverberg; Edwin Rivera; Eric Geller; Chad Carlson; Orrin Devinsky; Werner K Doyle
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.937

7.  How common are the "common" neurologic disorders?

Authors:  D Hirtz; D J Thurman; K Gwinn-Hardy; M Mohamed; A R Chaudhuri; R Zalutsky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A prospective long-term study of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Jason Soss; Christi Heck; Diana Murray; Daniela Markovic; Sandra Oviedo; Guadalupe Corrale-Leyva; Steven Gordon; Colin Kealey; Christopher DeGiorgio
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 9.  Evidence-based guideline update: vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  George L Morris; David Gloss; Jeffrey Buchhalter; Kenneth J Mack; Katherine Nickels; Cynthia Harden
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Vagus nerve stimulation therapy, epilepsy, and device parameters: scientific basis and recommendations for use.

Authors:  Christi Heck; Sandra L Helmers; Christopher M DeGiorgio
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Anatomo-Physiologic Basis for Auricular Stimulation.

Authors:  Beniamina Mercante; Francesca Ginatempo; Andrea Manca; Francesco Melis; Paolo Enrico; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Ventilation and neurochemical changes during µ-opioid receptor activation or blockade of excitatory receptors in the hypoglossal motor nucleus of goats.

Authors:  Thomas M Langer; Suzanne E Neumueller; Emma Crumley; Nicholas J Burgraff; Sawan Talwar; Matthew R Hodges; Lawrence Pan; Hubert V Forster
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-08-24

3.  A Highly Miniaturized, Chronically Implanted ASIC for Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jay Shah; Christopher Quinkert; Brett Collar; Michael Williams; Ethan Biggs; Pedro Irazoqui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.234

4.  State-dependent and -independent effects of dialyzing excitatory neuromodulator receptor antagonists into the ventral respiratory column.

Authors:  Thomas M Langer; Suzanne E Neumueller; Emma Crumley; Nicholas J Burgraff; Sawan Talwar; Matthew R Hodges; Lawrence Pan; Hubert V Forster
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Seizing Control: From Current Treatments to Optogenetic Interventions in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Anh D Bui; Allyson Alexander; Ivan Soltesz
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Antiepileptic Effects of a Novel Non-invasive Neuromodulation Treatment in a Subject With Early-Onset Epileptic Encephalopathy: Case Report With 20 Sessions of HD-tDCS Intervention.

Authors:  Oded Meiron; Rena Gale; Julia Namestnic; Odeya Bennet-Back; Nigel Gebodh; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Vladislav Mandzhiyev; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Cervical vagal nerve stimulation impairs glucose tolerance and suppresses insulin release in conscious rats.

Authors:  Harald M Stauss; Hubert Stangl; Karen C Clark; Anne E Kwitek; Vitor A Lira
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-12

8.  Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on blood glucose concentration in epilepsy patients - Importance of stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Harald M Stauss; Lucienne M Daman; Megan M Rohlf; Rup K Sainju
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-07

9.  Functional Network Alterations as Markers for Predicting the Treatment Outcome of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Focal Epilepsy.

Authors:  Jiaxin Hao; Wenyi Luo; Yuhai Xie; Yu Feng; Wei Sun; Weifeng Peng; Jun Zhao; Puming Zhang; Jing Ding; Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Spectrum of neurosurgeon's role in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Eun-Ik Son; Ji-Eun Kim
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.