Kaycee M Sink1, Mark A Espeland2, Cynthia M Castro3, Timothy Church4, Ron Cohen5, John A Dodson6, Jack Guralnik7, Hugh C Hendrie8, Janine Jennings9, Jeffery Katula10, Oscar L Lopez11, Mary M McDermott12, Marco Pahor5, Kieran F Reid13, Julia Rushing2, Joe Verghese14, Stephen Rapp15, Jeff D Williamson1. 1. Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 2. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 3. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 4. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 5. College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. 6. Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 7. Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 8. Department of Psychiatry and Center for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis. 9. Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 10. Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 11. Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 12. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois13Senior Editor, JAMA. 13. Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 14. Departments of Neurology and Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 15. Department of Psychiatry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Epidemiological evidence suggests that physical activity benefits cognition, but results from randomized trials are limited and mixed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 24-month physical activity program results in better cognitive function, lower risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, or both, compared with a health education program. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial, the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study, enrolled 1635 community-living participants at 8 US centers from February 2010 until December 2011. Participants were sedentary adults aged 70 to 89 years who were at risk for mobility disability but able to walk 400 m. INTERVENTIONS: A structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program (n = 818) that included walking, resistance training, and flexibility exercises or a health education program (n = 817) of educational workshops and upper-extremity stretching. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prespecified secondary outcomes of the LIFE study included cognitive function measured by the Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) task subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (score range: 0-133; higher scores indicate better function) and the revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R; 12-item word list recall task) assessed in 1476 participants (90.3%). Tertiary outcomes included global and executive cognitive function and incident MCI or dementia at 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, DSC task and HVLT-R scores (adjusted for clinic site, sex, and baseline values) were not different between groups. The mean DSC task scores were 46.26 points for the physical activity group vs 46.28 for the health education group (mean difference, -0.01 points [95% CI, -0.80 to 0.77 points], P = .97). The mean HVLT-R delayed recall scores were 7.22 for the physical activity group vs 7.25 for the health education group (mean difference, -0.03 words [95% CI, -0.29 to 0.24 words], P = .84). No differences for any other cognitive or composite measures were observed. Participants in the physical activity group who were 80 years or older (n = 307) and those with poorer baseline physical performance (n = 328) had better changes in executive function composite scores compared with the health education group (P = .01 for interaction for both comparisons). Incident MCI or dementia occurred in 98 participants (13.2%) in the physical activity group and 91 participants (12.1%) in the health education group (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.46]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among sedentary older adults, a 24-month moderate-intensity physical activity program compared with a health education program did not result in improvements in global or domain-specific cognitive function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01072500.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Epidemiological evidence suggests that physical activity benefits cognition, but results from randomized trials are limited and mixed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 24-month physical activity program results in better cognitive function, lower risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, or both, compared with a health education program. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial, the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study, enrolled 1635 community-living participants at 8 US centers from February 2010 until December 2011. Participants were sedentary adults aged 70 to 89 years who were at risk for mobility disability but able to walk 400 m. INTERVENTIONS: A structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program (n = 818) that included walking, resistance training, and flexibility exercises or a health education program (n = 817) of educational workshops and upper-extremity stretching. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prespecified secondary outcomes of the LIFE study included cognitive function measured by the Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) task subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (score range: 0-133; higher scores indicate better function) and the revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R; 12-item word list recall task) assessed in 1476 participants (90.3%). Tertiary outcomes included global and executive cognitive function and incident MCI or dementia at 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, DSC task and HVLT-R scores (adjusted for clinic site, sex, and baseline values) were not different between groups. The mean DSC task scores were 46.26 points for the physical activity group vs 46.28 for the health education group (mean difference, -0.01 points [95% CI, -0.80 to 0.77 points], P = .97). The mean HVLT-R delayed recall scores were 7.22 for the physical activity group vs 7.25 for the health education group (mean difference, -0.03 words [95% CI, -0.29 to 0.24 words], P = .84). No differences for any other cognitive or composite measures were observed. Participants in the physical activity group who were 80 years or older (n = 307) and those with poorer baseline physical performance (n = 328) had better changes in executive function composite scores compared with the health education group (P = .01 for interaction for both comparisons). Incident MCI or dementia occurred in 98 participants (13.2%) in the physical activity group and 91 participants (12.1%) in the health education group (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.46]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among sedentary older adults, a 24-month moderate-intensity physical activity program compared with a health education program did not result in improvements in global or domain-specific cognitive function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01072500.
Authors: Mark A Espeland; Stephen R Rapp; George A Bray; Denise K Houston; Karen C Johnson; Abbas E Kitabchi; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Jeff Williamson; John M Jakicic; Brent van Dorsten; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: W Jack Rejeski; Roger A Fielding; Steven N Blair; Jack M Guralnik; Thomas M Gill; Evan C Hadley; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael E Miller; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: A L Stewart; C J Verboncoeur; B Y McLellan; D E Gillis; S Rush; K M Mills; A C King; P Ritter; B W Brown; W M Bortz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Patrick J Smith; James A Blumenthal; Benson M Hoffman; Harris Cooper; Timothy A Strauman; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Kaycee M Sink; Mark A Espeland; Julia Rushing; Cynthia M Castro; Timothy S Church; Ronald Cohen; Thomas M Gill; Leora Henkin; Janine M Jennings; Diana R Kerwin; Todd M Manini; Valerie Myers; Marco Pahor; Kieran F Reid; Nancy Woolard; Stephen R Rapp; Jeff D Williamson Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Michelle W Voss; Carmen Soto; Seungwoo Yoo; Matthew Sodoma; Carmen Vivar; Henriette van Praag Journal: Trends Cogn Sci Date: 2019-02-16 Impact factor: 20.229
Authors: Joshua Z Willey; Yeseon P Moon; Ralph L Sacco; Heather Greenlee; Keith M Diaz; Clinton B Wright; Mitchell Sv Elkind; Yuen K Cheung Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Jack Guralnik; Marco Pahor; Nancy W Glynn; Anne B Newman; Tamer S Ibrahim; Kirk Erickson; Ronald Cohen; C Elizabeth Shaaban; Rebecca L MacCloud; Howard J Aizenstein Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; Terri Blackwell; Steven R Cummings; Eric S Orwoll; Kate A Duchowny; Deborah M Kado; Katie L Stone; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; William J Evans Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Priya Palta; Gerardo Heiss; A Richey Sharrett; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Keenan Walker; Kelly R Evenson; David Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; Dean F Wong; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: M Tabue-Teguo; P Barreto de Souza; C Cantet; S Andrieu; N Simo; B Fougère; J F Dartigues; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075