Literature DB >> 26305321

Outlier detection and removal improves accuracy of machine learning approach to multispectral burn diagnostic imaging.

Weizhi Li1, Weirong Mo1, Xu Zhang1, John J Squiers2, Yang Lu1, Eric W Sellke1, Wensheng Fan1, J Michael DiMaio2, Jeffrey E Thatcher1.   

Abstract

Multispectral imaging (MSI) was implemented to develop a burn tissue classification device to assist burn surgeons in planning and performing debridement surgery. To build a classification model via machine learning, training data accurately representing the burn tissue was needed, but assigning raw MSI data to appropriate tissue classes is prone to error. We hypothesized that removing outliers from the training dataset would improve classification accuracy. A swine burn model was developed to build an MSI training database and study an algorithm’s burn tissue classification abilities. After the ground-truth database was generated, we developed a multistage method based on Z -test and univariate analysis to detect and remove outliers from the training dataset. Using 10-fold cross validation, we compared the algorithm’s accuracy when trained with and without the presence of outliers. The outlier detection and removal method reduced the variance of the training data. Test accuracy was improved from 63% to 76%, matching the accuracy of clinical judgment of expert burn surgeons, the current gold standard in burn injury assessment. Given that there are few surgeons and facilities specializing in burn care, this technology may improve the standard of burn care for patients without access to specialized facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26305321     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.12.121305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Techniques for Clinical Burn Assessment with a Focus on Multispectral Imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Thatcher; John J Squiers; Stephen C Kanick; Darlene R King; Yang Lu; Yulin Wang; Rachit Mohan; Eric W Sellke; J Michael DiMaio
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Burn-injured tissue detection for debridement surgery through the combination of non-invasive optical imaging techniques.

Authors:  Juan Heredia-Juesas; Jeffrey E Thatcher; Yang Lu; John J Squiers; Darlene King; Wensheng Fan; J Michael DiMaio; Jose A Martinez-Lorenzo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Applying density-based outlier identifications using multiple datasets for validation of stroke clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ching-Heng Lin; Kai-Cheng Hsu; Kory R Johnson; Marie Luby; Yang C Fann
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  DL4Burn: Burn Surgical Candidacy Prediction using Multimodal Deep Learning.

Authors:  Sirisha Rambhatla; Samantha Huang; Loc Trinh; Mengfei Zhang; Boyuan Long; Mingtao Dong; Vyom Unadkat; Haig A Yenikomshian; Justin Gillenwater; Yan Liu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Serra E Moura; Kavit Amin; Chidi Ekwobi
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-08-19

6.  Hyperspectral and multispectral image processing for gross-level tumor detection in skin lesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleni Aloupogianni; Masahiro Ishikawa; Naoki Kobayashi; Takashi Obi
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.758

7.  Classification of Focal and Non Focal Epileptic Seizures Using Multi-Features and SVM Classifier.

Authors:  N Sriraam; S Raghu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Burn wound classification model using spatial frequency-domain imaging and machine learning.

Authors:  Rebecca Rowland; Adrien Ponticorvo; Melissa Baldado; Gordon T Kennedy; David M Burmeister; Robert J Christy; Nicole P Bernal; Anthony J Durkin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  A background correction method to compensate illumination variation in hyperspectral imaging.

Authors:  Jonghee Yoon; Alexandru Grigoroiu; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Machine learning and computer vision approaches for phenotypic profiling.

Authors:  Ben T Grys; Dara S Lo; Nil Sahin; Oren Z Kraus; Quaid Morris; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.