Laurelie R Wall1,2,3, Bena Cartmill4,5, Elizabeth C Ward4,6, Anne J Hill6,7, Elizabeth Isenring8,9, Sandro V Porceddu10,11. 1. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. l.wall@uq.edu.au. 2. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. l.wall@uq.edu.au. 3. Speech Pathology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. l.wall@uq.edu.au. 4. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Speech Pathology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. 6. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 7. Centre for Research Excellence in Telehealth, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 8. Dietetics Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. 9. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia. 10. Radiation Oncology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. 11. School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dysphagia is a common and debilitating side effect for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy ([C]RT) and is associated with nutritional and emotional comorbidities. Emotional sequelae and distress are also known to affect carers of HNC patients. A weekly, joint speech pathology/dietetic (SP/DN) service-delivery model has been employed to manage swallowing/nutritional and associated emotional issues during (C)RT. This study aimed to conduct a service evaluation of the weekly SP/DN clinical model. METHODS: Cross-sectional sampling of core service metrics and perceptions of key stakeholders (70 HNC patients, 30 carers, and 10 clinicians) were collated from the Metro South Radiation Oncology Service in Brisbane, Australia. Data from each source was examined separately and then triangulated. RESULTS: An average of 28 patients (SD = 5.54) attended SP/DN appointments per week, with 58% reporting swallowing and/or nutritional issues. Distress was reported by 27% of patients and 30% of carers. Clinicians felt able to adequately identify and manage swallowing and nutrition 90% of the time but only 10% of the time for distress. Seventy-six percent of scheduled SP/DN sessions were perceived as necessary by either patients, clinicians or both. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated a third of patients and their carers had a high level of distress during HNC [C]RT, supporting need for the provision of a weekly SP/DN service in a select cohort. However, the routine weekly SP/DN assessment model for all patients undergoing HNC treatment demonstrates the potential for over-servicing. Alternative service-delivery models warrant further evaluation.
PURPOSE:Dysphagia is a common and debilitating side effect for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy ([C]RT) and is associated with nutritional and emotional comorbidities. Emotional sequelae and distress are also known to affect carers of HNC patients. A weekly, joint speech pathology/dietetic (SP/DN) service-delivery model has been employed to manage swallowing/nutritional and associated emotional issues during (C)RT. This study aimed to conduct a service evaluation of the weekly SP/DN clinical model. METHODS: Cross-sectional sampling of core service metrics and perceptions of key stakeholders (70 HNC patients, 30 carers, and 10 clinicians) were collated from the Metro South Radiation Oncology Service in Brisbane, Australia. Data from each source was examined separately and then triangulated. RESULTS: An average of 28 patients (SD = 5.54) attended SP/DN appointments per week, with 58% reporting swallowing and/or nutritional issues. Distress was reported by 27% of patients and 30% of carers. Clinicians felt able to adequately identify and manage swallowing and nutrition 90% of the time but only 10% of the time for distress. Seventy-six percent of scheduled SP/DN sessions were perceived as necessary by either patients, clinicians or both. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated a third of patients and their carers had a high level of distress during HNC [C]RT, supporting need for the provision of a weekly SP/DN service in a select cohort. However, the routine weekly SP/DN assessment model for all patients undergoing HNC treatment demonstrates the potential for over-servicing. Alternative service-delivery models warrant further evaluation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head and neck cancer; Service evaluation; Service-delivery; Supportive care intervention
Authors: Nam P Nguyen; Cheryl Frank; Candace C Moltz; Paul Vos; Herbert J Smith; Ulf Karlsson; Suresh Dutta; Allan Midyett; Jessica Barloon; Sabah Sallah Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johannes A Langendijk; Patricia Doornaert; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Charles R Leemans; Neil K Aaronson; Ben J Slotman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisette van der Molen; Maya A van Rossum; Lori M Burkhead; Ludi E Smeele; Frans J M Hilgers Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marianne Boll Kristensen; Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Anne Marie Beck; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Irene Wessel; Karin B Dieperink Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Laura B Moroney; Elizabeth C Ward; Jennifer Helios; Jane Crombie; Clare L Burns; Claire Blake; Tracy Comans; Benjamin Chua; Lizbeth Kenny; Brett G M Hughes Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.603