Literature DB >> 26303628

[Augmentation technique on the proximal humerus].

A Scola1, F Gebhard, G Röderer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment of osteoporotic fractures is still a challenge. The advantages of augmentation with respect to primary in vitro stability and the clinical use for the proximal humerus are presented in this article.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study six paired human humeri were randomized into an augmented and a non-augmented group. Osteosynthesis was performed with a PHILOS plate (Synthes®). In the augmented group the two screws finding purchase in the weakest cancellous bone were augmented. The specimens were tested in a 3-part fracture model in a varus bending test.
RESULTS: The augmented PHILOS plates withstood significantly more load cycles until failure. The correlation to bone mineral density (BMD) showed that augmentation could partially compensate for low BMD.
CONCLUSION: The augmentation of the screws in locked plating in a proximal humerus fracture model is effective in improving the primary stability in a cyclic varus bending test. The targeted augmentation of two particular screws in a region of low bone quality within the humeral head was almost as effective as four screws with twice the amount of bone cement. Screw augmentation combined with a knowledge of the local bone quality could be more effective in enhancing the primary stability of a proximal humerus locking plate because the effect of augmentation can be exploited more effectively limiting it to the degree required. The technique of augmentation is simple and can be applied in open and minimally invasive procedures. When the correct procedure is used, complications (cement leakage into the joint) can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303628     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-015-0061-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  25 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of proximal humeral fracture fixation supplemented with calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Darrell J Goertzen; Peter J O'Brien; Henry M Broekhuyse; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Naeder Helmy; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Standardised cement augmentation of the PFNA using a perforated blade: A new technique and preliminary clinical results. A prospective multicentre trial.

Authors:  C Kammerlander; F Gebhard; C Meier; A Lenich; W Linhart; B Clasbrummel; T Neubauer-Gartzke; M Garcia-Alonso; T Pavelka; M Blauth
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  A J Wijgman; W Roolker; T W Patt; E L F B Raaymakers; R K Marti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Tobias Roth; Martin Gschwentner; Armin Suckert; Michael Blauth; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Ex vivo evaluation of the polymerization temperatures during cement augmentation of proximal femoral nail antirotation blades.

Authors:  Ladina Fliri; Mark Lenz; Andreas Boger; Markus Windolf
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Second generation locked plating of proximal humerus fractures--a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Götz Röderer; Johannes Erhardt; Markus Kuster; Paul Vegt; Christian Bahrs; Lothar Kinzl; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Long-term results of the augmented PFNA: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  C Kammerlander; H Doshi; F Gebhard; A Scola; C Meier; W Linhart; M Garcia-Alonso; J Nistal; M Blauth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Minimally invasive application of the non-contact-bridging (NCB) plate to the proximal humerus: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Götz Röderer; Maged Abouelsoud; Florian Gebhard; Tobias M Böckers; Lothar Kinzl
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Authors:  N Südkamp; J Bayer; P Hepp; C Voigt; H Oestern; M Kääb; C Luo; M Plecko; K Wendt; W Köstler; G Konrad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe?

Authors:  Konrad Schuetze; S Ehinger; A Eickhoff; C Dehner; F Gebhard; P H Richter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  [Traumatology in the elderly : Multimodal prevention of delirium and use of augmentation techniques].

Authors:  D Wähnert; A Roos; J Glasbrenner; K Ilting-Reuke; P Ohrmann; G Hempel; T Duning; N Roeder; M J Raschke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Influence of Medial Support Screws on the Maintenance of Fracture Reduction after Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Lang-Qing Zeng; Lu-Lu Zeng; Yu-Wen Jiang; Hai-Feng Wei; Wen Zhang; Yun-Feng Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.