Literature DB >> 26303288

In vivo monitoring of bone architecture and remodeling after implant insertion: The different responses of cortical and trabecular bone.

Zihui Li1, Gisela Kuhn1, Marcella von Salis-Soglio1, Stephen J Cooke2, Michael Schirmer3, Ralph Müller1, Davide Ruffoni4.   

Abstract

The mechanical integrity of the bone-implant system is maintained by the process of bone remodeling. Specifically, the interplay between bone resorption and bone formation is of paramount importance to fully understand the net changes in bone structure occurring in the peri-implant bone, which are eventually responsible for the mechanical stability of the bone-implant system. Using time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography combined with new composite material implants, we were able to characterize the spatio-temporal changes of bone architecture and bone remodeling following implantation in living mice. After insertion, implant stability was attained by a quick and substantial thickening of the cortical shell which counteracted the observed loss of trabecular bone, probably due to the disruption of the trabecular network. Within the trabecular compartment, the rate of bone formation close to the implant was transiently higher than far from the implant mainly due to an increased mineral apposition rate which indicated a higher osteoblastic activity. Conversely, in cortical bone, the higher rate of bone formation close to the implant compared to far away was mostly related to the recruitment of new osteoblasts as indicated by a prevailing mineralizing surface. The behavior of bone resorption also showed dissimilarities between trabecular and cortical bone. In the former, the rate of bone resorption was higher in the peri-implant region and remained elevated during the entire monitoring period. In the latter, bone resorption rate had a bigger value away from the implant and decreased with time. Our approach may help to tune the development of smart implants that can attain a better long-term stability by a local and targeted manipulation of the remodeling process within the cortical and the trabecular compartments and, particularly, in bone of poor health.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone remodeling; Implant anchorage; Implant osseointegration; In vivo micro-computed tomography; Metal artifacts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303288     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Duncan Betts; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  The Assessment of Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Hamid Abbasi; John A Hipp
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-10-20

5.  Impaired bone formation in ovariectomized mice reduces implant integration as indicated by longitudinal in vivo micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differential effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus and subsequent osteoblastic β-catenin activation on trabecular and cortical bone in a mouse model.

Authors:  Sixu Chen; Daocheng Liu; Sihao He; Lei Yang; Quanwei Bao; Hao Qin; Huayu Liu; Yufeng Zhao; Zhaowen Zong
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.718

7.  Polylactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres added to fixative cements and its role on bone infected architecture.

Authors:  Blanca Ibarra; Joaquin García-García; Galo Azuara; Blanca Vázquez-Lasa; Miguel A Ortega; Ángel Asúnsolo; Julio San Román; Julia Buján; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Basilio De la Torre
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Longitudinal time-lapse in vivo micro-CT reveals differential patterns of peri-implant bone changes after subclinical bacterial infection in a rat model.

Authors:  Vincent A Stadelmann; Keith Thompson; Stephan Zeiter; Karin Camenisch; Ursula Styger; Sheila Patrick; Andrew McDowell; Dirk Nehrbass; R Geoff Richards; T Fintan Moriarty
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of the bone morphology around four types of porous metal implants placed in distal femur of ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Stanislav Bondarenko; Nataliya Ashukina; Valentyna Maltseva; Gennadiy Ivanov; Ahmed Amine Badnaoui; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.