Literature DB >> 26303225

PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Haller J Smith1, Christen L Walters Haygood2, Rebecca C Arend2, Charles A Leath2, J Michael Straughn2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, as maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive (PS) recurrent ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Two separate decision analysis models compared the cost of observation versus olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with PS recurrent ovarian cancer, one for patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and one for patients with wild-type BRCA1/2. Patients received six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Drug costs were estimated using 2014-2015 wholesale acquisition costs. The cost of olaparib was estimated at $13,440 per month. Rate of germline BRCA1/2 mutation was estimated at 20%. Progression-free survival was determined from published data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per progression-free life-year saved (PF-LYS) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis estimated the cost at which olaparib would be cost-effective.
RESULTS: We estimated that there were 5549 patients diagnosed with PS recurrent ovarian cancer in the United States annually. The cost of observation in 1110 patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation was $5.5 million (M) versus $169.2M for maintenance therapy with olaparib. The ICER for olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with a BRCA mutation was $258,864 per PF-LYS. If the cost of olaparib was decreased to $2500 per month, the ICER was $49,584. For the 4439 patients with wild-type BRCA, the cost of maintenance therapy was $444.2M; the ICER was $600,552 per PF-LYS.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, maintenance therapy with olaparib is not cost-effective with an ICER of $258,864 per PF-LYS. To achieve an ICER of less than $50,000, the cost of olaparib should be $2500 or less per month. For wild-type BRCA1/2 patients, maintenance therapy with olaparib is not cost-effective.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Cost-effectiveness; Olaparib; Ovarian cancer; PARP inhibitiors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303225     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Phase II clinical trial of metformin as a cancer stem cell-targeting agent in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason R Brown; Daniel K Chan; Jessica J Shank; Kent A Griffith; Huihui Fan; Robert Szulawski; Kun Yang; R Kevin Reynolds; Carolyn Johnston; Karen McLean; Shitanshu Uppal; J Rebecca Liu; Lourdes Cabrera; Sarah E Taylor; Brian C Orr; Francesmary Modugno; Pooja Mehta; Michael Bregenzer; Geeta Mehta; Hui Shen; Lan G Coffman; Ronald J Buckanovich
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-06-04

2.  A prospective observational study on the optimal maintenance strategy in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab-based therapy.

Authors:  Qian Li; Minzhi Lv; Huiqin Jiang; Yan Wang; Shan Yu; Wei Li; Yiyi Yu; Tianshu Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Haley A Moss; Karen H Lu; Angeles A Secord; Laura J Havrilesky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Current Systemic Treatment Landscape of Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Kathy Pan; Jun Gong; Karen Huynh; Mihaela Cristea
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic disease assessment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ross F Harrison; Scott B Cantor; Charlotte C Sun; Mariana Villanueva; Shannon N Westin; Nicole D Fleming; Iakovos Toumazis; Anil K Sood; Karen H Lu; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation Based on the POLO Trial.

Authors:  Mei Zhan; Hanrui Zheng; Yu Yang; Zhiyao He; Ting Xu; Qiu Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Total and out-of-pocket costs for PARP inhibitors among insured ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Ling Chen; Dawn L Hershman; Grace C Hillyer; Warner K Huh; Allison Guyton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Patient cost sharing during poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ross F Harrison; Shuangshuang Fu; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 10.693

9.  Association between family history, mutation locations, and prevalence of BRCA1 or 2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Yen Y Tan; Daniela Muhr; Christine Rappaport; Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Christoph Grimm; Stephan Polterauer; Georg Pfeiler; Andreas Berger; Muy-Kheng M Tea
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib Versus Routine Surveillance, Olaparib and Rucaparib for the Maintenance Treatment of Patients with Ovarian Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Holly Guy; Lydia Walder; Mark Fisher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.