Literature DB >> 33375989

Total and out-of-pocket costs for PARP inhibitors among insured ovarian cancer patients.

Margaret I Liang1, Ling Chen2, Dawn L Hershman3, Grace C Hillyer4, Warner K Huh5, Allison Guyton6, Jason D Wright7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate total and out-of-pocket costs for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and differences based on insurance characteristics.
METHODS: We identified ovarian cancer patients who were prescribed niraparib, olaparib, or rucaparib from the MarketScan (2014-2017) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare (2014-2016) databases. Drug costs were estimated for a 30-day supply. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed.
RESULTS: 590 commercially insured beneficiaries from MarketScan and 213 SEER-Medicare beneficiaries were prescribed PARP inhibitors for a median 112 days. For commercially insured beneficiaries, median total cost was $13,342 (IQR $12,022-$14,256). Median out-of-pocket cost was $44 (IQR $0-$120) and PARP inhibitors accounted for a median 90.8% of patients' total out-of-pocket drug spending. High-deductible health plan was not associated with higher out-of-pocket costs (N = 570; median $0 vs. $45, P = 0.87). For SEER-Medicare beneficiaries, median total cost was $12,798 (IQR $11,704-$13,180). Median out-of-pocket cost was $370 (IQR $2-$1234) and PARP inhibitors accounted for a median 99.0% of patients' total out-of-pocket drug spending. Out-of-pocket costs were lower for dual-eligible patients with supplemental Medicaid prescription coverage (N = 209; median $1 vs. $911, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although insurers are responsible for a large proportion of PARP inhibitor costs, out-of-pocket costs for PARP inhibitors account for a majority of patients' drug spending. SEER-Medicare beneficiaries had higher out-of-pocket costs than patients with commercial insurance, which was offset for those with supplemental Medicaid prescription coverage.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of illness; Female genital neoplasms; Health expenditures; Health insurance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375989      PMCID: PMC7902421          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  23 in total

1.  Patient and plan characteristics affecting abandonment of oral oncolytic prescriptions.

Authors:  Sonya Blesser Streeter; Lee Schwartzberg; Nadia Husain; Michael Johnsrud
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Position Statement on Addressing the Affordability of Cancer Drugs.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Use of Charity Financial Assistance for Novel Oral Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Adam J Olszewski; Andrew R Zullo; Christopher R Nering; Justin P Huynh
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Factors Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Initiation and Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Aaron N Winn; Nancy L Keating; Stacie B Dusetzina
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Minimizing the burden of cancer in the United States: Goals for a high-performing health care system.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Ted Gansler; Richard C Wender; Kevin J Cullen; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Out-of-pocket costs and oral cancer medication discontinuation in the elderly.

Authors:  Nantana Kaisaeng; Spencer E Harpe; Norman V Carroll
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2014-07

7.  Trajectories of Injectable Cancer Drug Costs After Launch in the United States.

Authors:  Noa Gordon; Salomon M Stemmer; Dan Greenberg; Daniel A Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib and Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy for Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Lixian Zhong; Anh Thu Tran; Taylor Tomasino; Elizabeth Nugent; Judith A Smith
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2018-12

9.  Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib Versus Routine Surveillance, Olaparib and Rucaparib for the Maintenance Treatment of Patients with Ovarian Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Holly Guy; Lydia Walder; Mark Fisher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  2018 Hematology/Oncology Pharmacist Association Best Practices for the Management of Oral Oncolytic Therapy: Pharmacy Practice Standard.

Authors:  Emily Mackler; Eve M Segal; Benyam Muluneh; Kate Jeffers; Jenna Carmichael
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.