Literature DB >> 26302502

Modeling a Conventional Electroporation Pulse Train: Decreased Pore Number, Cumulative Calcium Transport and an Example of Electrosensitization.

Reuben S Son, Thiruvallur R Gowrishankar, Kyle C Smith, James C Weaver.   

Abstract

Pulse trains are widely used in electroporation (EP) for both general biomedical research and clinical applications such as nonthermal tumor ablation. Here we use a computational method based on a meshed transport network to investigate a cell system model's response to a train of identical, evenly spaced electric field pulses. We obtain an unexpected result: the number of membrane pores decreases during the application of twenty 1.0 kV/cm, 100 μs pulses, delivered at 1 Hz. This pulse train initially creates 13,000 membrane pores, but pore number decreases by a factor of 15 to about 830 pores throughout subsequent pulses. We conclude that pore number can greatly diminish during a train of identical pulses, with direct consequences for the transport of solutes across an electroporated membrane. Although application of additional pulses is generally intended to increase the effects of EP, we show that these pulses do not significantly enhance calcium delivery into the cell. Instead, calcium delivery can be significantly increased by varying inter-pulse intervals. We show that inserting a 300-s interruption midway in a widely used eight-pulse train (a protocol for electrosensitization) yields a ∼ twofold delivery increase. Overall, our modeling shows support for electrosensitization, in which multiple pulse protocols that maximize pore number over time can yield significant increase of transport of calcium compared to standard pulse trains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26302502     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2466234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  11 in total

1.  Nanometer-Scale Permeabilization and Osmotic Swelling Induced by 5-ns Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Stefania Romeo; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Dielectrophoresis study of temporal change in internal conductivity of single CHO cells after electroporation by pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  E Salimi; K Braasch; M Butler; D J Thomson; G E Bridges
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Control by Low Levels of Calcium of Mammalian Cell Membrane Electropermeabilization.

Authors:  Florin Ciobanu; Muriel Golzio; Eugenia Kovacs; Justin Teissié
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Myogenic tissue nanotransfection improves muscle torque recovery following volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Andrew Clark; Subhadip Ghatak; Poornachander Reddy Guda; Mohamed S El Masry; Yi Xuan; Amy Y Sato; Teresita Bellido; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2022-10-20

5.  Combined Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Localized Electroporation-Based Cell Transfection and Sampling.

Authors:  Prithvijit Mukherjee; S Shiva P Nathamgari; John A Kessler; Horacio D Espinosa
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  High Throughput and Highly Controllable Methods for In Vitro Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Justin Brooks; Grayson Minnick; Prithvijit Mukherjee; Arian Jaberi; Lingqian Chang; Horacio D Espinosa; Ruiguo Yang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  High-throughput Nuclear Delivery and Rapid Expression of DNA via Mechanical and Electrical Cell-Membrane Disruption.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Ding; Martin Stewart; Armon Sharei; James C Weaver; Robert S Langer; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Magnetic and electric field accelerate Phytoextraction of copper Lemna minor duckweed.

Authors:  Natalia Politaeva; Vladimir Badenko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cell Electrosensitization Exists Only in Certain Electroporation Buffers.

Authors:  Janja Dermol; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Delayed hypersensitivity to nanosecond pulsed electric field in electroporated cells.

Authors:  Sarah D Jensen; Vera A Khorokhorina; Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.