Literature DB >> 26302362

Minimizing technical variation during sample preparation prior to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry.

E Scheerlinck1, M Dhaenens1, A Van Soom2, L Peelman3, P De Sutter4, K Van Steendam1, D Deforce5.   

Abstract

Sample preparation is the crucial starting point to obtain high-quality mass spectrometry data and can be divided into two main steps in a bottom-up proteomics approach: cell/tissue lysis with or without detergents and a(n) (in-solution) digest comprising denaturation, reduction, alkylation, and digesting of the proteins. Here, some important considerations, among others, are that the reagents used for sample preparation can inhibit the digestion enzyme (e.g., 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS] and 0.5 M guanidine HCl), give rise to ion suppression (e.g., polyethylene glycol [PEG]), be incompatible with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (e.g., SDS), and can induce additional modifications (e.g., urea). Taken together, all of these irreproducible effects are gradually becoming a problem when label-free quantitation of the samples is envisioned such as during the increasingly popular high-definition mass spectrometry (HDMS(E)) and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH) data-independent acquisition strategies. Here, we describe the detailed validation of a reproducible method with sufficient protein yield for sample preparation without any known LC-MS/MS interfering substances by using 1% sodium deoxycholate (SDC) during both cell lysis and in-solution digest.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HDMS(E); SDC; Sample preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26302362     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  10 in total

1.  SWATH-MS Proteomic Approach to Discover Novel Protein Targets and Pathways in Response to Abscisic Acid.

Authors:  Bei Gao; Mo-Xian Chen; Fu-Yuan Zhu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Separation, characterization, and standardization of extracellular vesicles for drug delivery applications.

Authors:  Dominik Buschmann; Veronika Mussack; James Brian Byrd
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 17.873

3.  Assessing the impact of minimizing arginine conversion in fully defined SILAC culture medium in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Ellen Scheerlinck; Katleen Van Steendam; Simon Daled; Elisabeth Govaert; Liesbeth Vossaert; Paulien Meert; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Ann Van Soom; Luc Peelman; Petra De Sutter; Björn Heindryckx; Maarten Dhaenens; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Extracting histones for the specific purpose of label-free MS.

Authors:  Elisabeth Govaert; Katleen Van Steendam; Ellen Scheerlinck; Liesbeth Vossaert; Paulien Meert; Martina Stella; Sander Willems; Laura De Clerck; Maarten Dhaenens; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications.

Authors:  Girijesh Kumar Patel; Mohammad Aslam Khan; Haseeb Zubair; Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava; Moh'd Khushman; Seema Singh; Ajay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of sodium deoxycholate as solubilization buffer for oil palm proteomics analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Yii Chung Lau; Abrizah Othman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of polyethylene glycol 20 000 on protein extraction efficiency of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in South Africa.

Authors:  Sophia Rossouw; Hocine Bendou; Liam Bell; Jonathan Rigby; Alan Christoffels
Journal:  Afr J Lab Med       Date:  2021-12-17

8.  Regulation of highly homologous major urinary proteins in house mice quantified with label-free proteomic methods.

Authors:  Viktoria M Enk; Christian Baumann; Michaela Thoß; Kenneth C Luzynski; Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2016-07-28

9.  Assessment of Sample Preparation Bias in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.

Authors:  Frank Klont; Linda Bras; Justina C Wolters; Sara Ongay; Rainer Bischoff; Gyorgy B Halmos; Péter Horvatovich
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Proteogenomic Characterization of the Cement and Adhesive Gland of the Pelagic Gooseneck Barnacle Lepas anatifera.

Authors:  Dany Domínguez-Pérez; Daniela Almeida; Josef Wissing; André M Machado; Lothar Jänsch; Agostinho Antunes; Luís Filipe Castro; Vitor Vasconcelos; Alexandre Campos; Isabel Cunha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.