| Literature DB >> 26301592 |
Xiaoyu Wang1, Meili Chen2, Jingfa Xiao2, Lirui Hao1, David E Crowley3, Zhewen Zhang2, Jun Yu2, Ning Huang1, Mingxin Huo1, Jiayan Wu2.
Abstract
Cupriavidus sp. are generally heavy metal tolerant bacteria with the ability to degrade a variety of aromatic hydrocarbon compounds, although the degradation pathways and substrate versatilities remain largely unknown. Here we studied the bacterium Cupriavidus gilardii strain CR3, which was isolated from a natural asphalt deposit, and which was shown to utilize naphthenic acids as a sole carbon source. Genome sequencing of C. gilardii CR3 was carried out to elucidate possible mechanisms for the naphthenic acid biodegradation. The genome of C. gilardii CR3 was composed of two circular chromosomes chr1 and chr2 of respectively 3,539,530 bp and 2,039,213 bp in size. The genome for strain CR3 encoded 4,502 putative protein-coding genes, 59 tRNA genes, and many other non-coding genes. Many genes were associated with xenobiotic biodegradation and metal resistance functions. Pathway prediction for degradation of cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, a representative naphthenic acid, suggested that naphthenic acid undergoes initial ring-cleavage, after which the ring fission products can be degraded via several plausible degradation pathways including a mechanism similar to that used for fatty acid oxidation. The final metabolic products of these pathways are unstable or volatile compounds that were not toxic to CR3. Strain CR3 was also shown to have tolerance to at least 10 heavy metals, which was mainly achieved by self-detoxification through ion efflux, metal-complexation and metal-reduction, and a powerful DNA self-repair mechanism. Our genomic analysis suggests that CR3 is well adapted to survive the harsh environment in natural asphalts containing naphthenic acids and high concentrations of heavy metals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26301592 PMCID: PMC4547698 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Circular representation of the two replicons of C. gilardii CR3.
(A). Chromosome 1; (B). Chromosome 2. Circles display from the inside outwards, (1) circle 1: GC-skew (G-C/G+C ratio) using a 3 kb window; (2) circle 2: GC-content using a 3 kb window; (3) circle 3: RNA genes; (4) circle 4: COG assignments for predicted CDSs on the minus strand; (5) circle 5: COG assignments for predicted CDSs on the plus strand; (6) circle 6: scale in Mb.
General features of the C. gilardii CR3 genome.
| Chromosome 1 | Chromosome 2 | Genome | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3,539,530 | 2,039,213 | 5,578,743 |
|
| 67.40% | 67.81% | 67.55% |
|
| 52 | 7 | 59 |
|
| 3 | 1 | 4 |
|
| 2,874 | 1,627 | 4,501 |
|
| 545 | 342 | 887 |
|
| 2,504 | 1,358 | 3,862 |
|
| 370 | 269 | 639 |
|
| 2,130 | 1,104 | 3,234 |
|
| 1,687 | 698 | 2,385 |
|
| 1,740 | 923 | 2,663 |
Fig 2Rooted phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of the genus Cupriavidus.
Cluster analysis was based upon the neighbour-joining method with Ralstonia pickettii 12D as the outlier. The scale bar represents 5‰ sequence divergence. Numbers at branch-points are percentages of 1000 bootstrap resamplings that support the tree topology.
Genome structure comparison between CR3 and seven other published Cupriavidus bacteria.
| Bacterium | Status | Genome Size (M) | GC content (%) | Chr | Plasmid | Protein | rRNA | tRNA | Total | Reference or download source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Finished | 7.42 | 66.34 | 2 | 1 | 6,626 | 15 | 58 | 6,699 | [ |
|
| Finished | 6.48 | 66.99 | 2 | 1 | 5,896 | 15 | 63 | 5,974 | [ |
|
| Finished | 8.48 | 65.47 | 2 | 2 | 7,832 | 15 | 68 | 7,915 | [ |
|
| Finished | 6.91 | 63.53 | 2 | 2 | 6,477 | 12 | 62 | 6,551 | [ |
|
| Finished | 7.26 | 64.43 | 2 | 2 | 6,446 | 18 | 66 | 6,530 | [ |
|
| Draft | 8.55 | 65.39 | - | - | 7,534 | 5 | 61 | 7,600 | [ |
|
| Draft | 5.49 | 67.54 | - | - | 4,931 | 6 | 53 | 4,990 |
|
|
| Finished | 5.58 | 67.55 | 2 | 0 | 4,501 | 12 | 59 | 4,572 | This study |
Fig 3Synteny plot analysis of Cupriavidus replicons.
(A) Synteny plot analysis of Chr1 from C. galardii CR3 and from 5 other finished Cupriavidus strains; (B) Synteny plot analysis of Chr 1 from C. galardii CR3 and pMOL30 from C. metallidurans CH34.
Fig 4Comparative analysis of gene distribution in two chromosomes.
Inner ring shows the number of ortholog gene clusters that are shared by all species based on PGAP result. Outer semi-ring shows the number of ortholog gene clusters that are unique to one strain based on PGAP result. Abbreviation: CR3, C. gilardii CR3; CH34, C. metallidurans CH34; H16, C. eutropha H16; JMP134, C. pinatubonensis JMP134; N1, C. necator N1; Taiwanesis, C. taiwanesis.
Fig 5Functional distribution over two replicons based on COG classification.
The scale represents the relative ratio of CDS numbers per gene source (i.e. the ratio of percentages for each class per replicon).
Fig 6Predicted naphthenic acid degradation pathway in CR3.
(A) Peripheral ring-cleavage pathway; (B) Central oxidative degradation pathways; (C) The structure of compound A. Compounds in red are substrates. Enzyme genes are marked on the right of arrows, including gene description (purple color), gene symbol (green color) and gene identifications (light blue color). If CR3 genome only encoded isoenzyme gene, gene identifications were marked in italic. Isoenzyme gene were defined as a gene assigned to a same enzyme class with the same EC NO. And enzyme genes with unknown gene symbol were marked as ‘?’.
NAs degradation genes.
| Process | Step | Gene symbol | EC No. | Definition | Gene(s) identification NO. | Isoenzyme gene(s) identification NO. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Acylation |
| EC:6.2.1.- | Cyclohexanecarboxylate-CoA ligase | CR3_3384 | CR3_0434, 0592, 1107, 1488, 2610, 3988 |
| Vinylation |
| EC:1.3.99.- | Cyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA dehydrogenase | / | CR3_0081, 0375, 0581, 0714, 0875, 0876, 1202, 3066, 3611 | |
| Alcoholization | - | EC:4.2.1.- | Cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxyl-CoA hydratase | / | CR3_0877, 0878 | |
| Aldehyde |
| EC:1.1.1.- | 2-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA dehydrogenase | / | CR3_0933, 2047, 3549, 4177 | |
| Ortho-ring cleavage |
| EC:3.1.2.- | 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA hydrolase | / | CR3_0381, 0556, 1032, 1466, 1527, 1604, 2439, 3536, 3576 | |
|
| Vinylation |
| EC:1.3.99.- | Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase | CR3_3611 | CR3_0081, 0375, 0581, 0714, 0875, 0876, 1202, 3066 |
| Alcoholization |
| EC:4.2.1.17 | Enoyl-CoA hydratase | CR3_0053, 1061, 2437 | / | |
| - | EC:4.2.1.- | - | CR3_0877 CR3_0878 | / | ||
| Aldehyde |
| EC:1.1.1.35 | 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase | CR3_0378, 1482, 3304 | / | |
|
| EC:1.1.1.157 | 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase | CR3_0216, 0899 | / | ||
| Deacetylation |
| EC:2.3.1.16 | Acetyl-CoA acyltransferase | CR3_0379, 4448 | / | |
| - | EC:2.3.1.- | - | CR3_1023, 1465, 2262 | CR3_0137, 0138, 0139, 1571, 2147, 2925, 2964, 4321 | ||
| Further deacetylation |
| EC:2.3.1.16 | Acetyl-CoA acyltransferase | CR3_0379, 4448 | / | |
| - | EC:2.3.1.- | - | CR3_1023, 1465, 2262 | CR3_0137, 0138, 0139, 1571, 2147, 2925, 2964, 4321 | ||
|
| EC:2.3.1.9 | Acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase | CR3_0079, 1480, 1566, 1570 | / | ||
| Deacylation |
| EC:1.2.1.3 | NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase | CR3_1990, 2485, 3236, 3377, 3395, 3859, 3905, 43304 | / |
1. Isoenzyme genes were defined as a gene assigned to a same enzyme class with the same EC NO.
2. Gene symbol was unknown.
3. The fadN gene was assigned to a same enzyme class and definition as HADH gene, except KEGG ko orthology.
4. The CR3 genome did not encode an acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (EC1.2.1.10), but encoded week specific enzyme of aldehyde dehydrogenase (EC1.2.1.3).
Fig 7Rooted phylogenetic tree based on gene gain and loss.
Cluster analysis was based upon the neighbour-joining method with Ralstonia pickettii 12D as the outlier. (A) Rooted phylogenetic tree based on NAs associated enzyme genes gain and loss; (B) Rooted phylogenetic tree based on genome genes gain and loss.
Metal resistance gene operons in C. gilardii CR3.
| Operon | Gene cluster | Gene identification number | Metal(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| CR3_1349,1350,1352–1358; CR3_3402–3404; CR3_3627–3630; CR3_4522–4524 | Cd2+, Zn2+, Co2+ |
|
|
| CR3_0172–0177; CR3_1309,1312–1315,1317–1323,1325–1328; CR3_1370–1372, 1374–1380 | Cu2+, Cu+ |
|
|
| CR3_2714–2716 | Hg2+ |
|
|
| CR3_1340–1342,1345 | Pb2+ |
|
|
| CR3_1305,1306,1322,1323 | Ag+ |
|
|
| CR3_1391–1393 | CrO4 2- |
|
|
| CR3_1304–1306 | Cu+, Ag+ |
|
|
| CR3_0010–0013; CR3_2425–2428; CR3_3225–3228; CR3_3295–3299; CR3_3708–3712 | Ni2+ |
1. Gene operons were located at chr1 replicon.
2. Gene operons were located at chr2 replicon.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of nine heavy metals in C.gilardii CR3 and C.metallidurans CH34.
| MIC(mM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Ionic form | Formulation Compound |
| C. |
|
| AgNO3 | 0.06 | 0.0005 |
|
| CdCl25H2O | 4 | 4 |
|
| CoCl26H2O | 2 | 25 |
|
| K2CrO4 | 2 | 0.4 |
|
| CuSO45H2O | 3 | 3 |
|
| HgCl2 | >0.04 | 0.0027 |
|
| NiCl26H2O | 3 | 13 |
|
| Pb(NO3)2 | 4 | 1 |
|
| ZnSO47H2O | >24 | 12 |
a MIC value of C.gilardii CR3 was from this study, MIC value of C. metallidurans CH34 was from reference [51].