Literature DB >> 26301228

Fractional flow reserve: Current applications and overview of the available data.

Matteo Tebaldi1, Gianluca Campo1, Simone Biscaglia1.   

Abstract

Flow fractional reserve (FFR) allows to evaluate the functional significance of coronary artery lesions, through the ratio of the mean coronary artery pressure after the stenosis to the mean aortic pressure during maximum hyperemia. The actual widely accepted cut-off value is 0.80. Below this value a coronary lesion is considered significant and therefore it requires invasive revascularization. Several studies [in particular Fractional Flow Reserve vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 1 (FAME-1) and FAME-2] have shown the relationship between FFR measurement and hard end-points (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization). Consequently, FFR evaluation represents the cornerstone in the decision-making in intermediate coronary lesions. Recent studies paved the way for further applications of FFR evaluation in complex and tricky clinical settings. In this paper, we perform an overview of the data regarding contemporary application of FFR. In particular, we review the use of FFR in: left main intermediate stenoses, serial stenoses, evaluation after stenting, guidance in coronary artery bypass surgery, and acute coronary syndrome. All the data presented in our overview confirm the essential role of FFR assessment in the daily clinical practice. The shift from "operator-dependent" to "FFR-dependent" evaluation in intermediate coronary artery stenosis is of paramount importance in order to improve the prognosis of our patients, through the discrimination of the functional role of every single coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Coronary artery bypass surgery; Fractional flow reserve; Intermediate coronary lesion; Left main; Serial stenoses

Year:  2015        PMID: 26301228      PMCID: PMC4539407          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i8.678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  16 in total

1.  Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; G R Heyndrickx; D Hodeige; R Kirkeeide; K L Gould
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Pepijn van Schaardenburgh; Ganesh Manoharan; Eric Boersma; Jan-Willem Bech; Marcel van't Veer; Frits Bär; Jan Hoorntje; Jacques Koolen; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Michalis Hamilos; Olivier Muller; Thomas Cuisset; Argyrios Ntalianis; Gregory Chlouverakis; Giovanna Sarno; Olivier Nelis; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Eric Wyffels; Emanuele Barbato; Guy R Heyndrickx; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery.

Authors:  Hack-Lyoung Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Ji-Hyun Kim; Han-Mo Yang; Kyung-Woo Park; Hae-Young Lee; Hyun-Jae Kang; Young-Seok Cho; Tae-Jin Youn; Sang-Hyun Kim; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi; Hyo-Soo Kim; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  When does a left anterior descending stenosis alter flow across a left main segment?: Interpreting left main fractional flow reserve with downstream obstruction.

Authors:  Morton J Kern
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Amir-Ali Fassa; Kenji Wagatsuma; Stuart T Higano; Verghese Mathew; Gregory W Barsness; Ryan J Lennon; David R Holmes; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Outcomes associated with fractional flow-guided revascularization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Islam Y Elgendy; John W Petersen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Fractional flow reserve: the past, present and future.

Authors:  Jeong-Eun Kim; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in left circumflex ostial intervention after left main crossover stenting.

Authors:  Chang-Wook Nam; Seung-Ho Hur; Bon-Kwon Koo; Joon Hyung Doh; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Hyoung-Seob Park; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Hyungseop Kim; In-Sung Chung; Yoon-Nyun Kim; William F Fearon; Seung-Jae Tahk; Kwon-Bae Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial.

Authors:  Jamie Layland; Keith G Oldroyd; Nick Curzen; Arvind Sood; Kanarath Balachandran; Raj Das; Shahid Junejo; Nadeem Ahmed; Matthew M Y Lee; Aadil Shaukat; Anna O'Donnell; Julian Nam; Andrew Briggs; Robert Henderson; Alex McConnachie; Colin Berry
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Application of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Valay Parikh; Kanishk Agnihotri; Sabeeda Kadavath; Nileshkumar J Patel; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pravesh Kumar Bundhun; Chandra Mouli Yanamala; Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  David Sparv; Matthias Götberg; Jan Harnek; Tobias Persson; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; David Erlinge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Li-Jie Wang; Shuo Han; Xiao-Hong Zhang; Yuan-Zhe Jin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.