Literature DB >> 26300666

Patient preferences for timing and access to radiation therapy.

I A Olivotto1, J Soo2, R A Olson3, L Rowe2, J French2, B Jensen2, A Pastuch2, R Halperin3, P T Truong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient preferences for radiation therapy (rt) access were investigated.
METHODS: Patients completing a course of rt at 6 centres received a 17-item survey that rated preferences for time of day; day of week; actual, ideal, and reasonable travel times for rt; and actual, ideal, and reasonable times between referral and first oncologic consultation. Patients receiving single-fraction rt or brachytherapy alone were excluded.
RESULTS: Of the respondents who returned surveys (n = 1053), 54% were women, and 74% had received more than 15 rt fractions. With respect to appointment times, 88% agreed or strongly agreed that rt between 08h00 and 16h30 was preferred; 14%-15% preferred 07h30-08h00 or 16h30-17h00; 10% preferred 17h00-18h00; and 6% or fewer preferred times before 07h30 or after 18h00. A preference not to receive rt before 07h30 or after 18h00 was expressed by 30% or more of the respondents. When days of the week were considered, 18% and 11% would have preferred to receive rt on a Saturday or Sunday respectively; 52% and 55% would have preferred not to receive rt on those days. A travel time of 1 hour or less for rt was reported by 82%, but 61% felt that a travel time of 1 hour or more was reasonable. A first consultation within 2 weeks of referral was felt to be ideal or reasonable by 88% and 73% of patients respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An rt service designed to meet patient preferences would make most capacity available between 08h00 and 16h30 on weekdays and provide 10%-20% of rt capacity on weekends and during 07h30-08h00 and 16h30-18h00 on weekdays. Approximately 80%, but not all, of the responding patients preferred a 2-week or shorter interval between referral and first oncologic consultation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation therapy; health service capacity; patient-centred care; preferences

Year:  2015        PMID: 26300666      PMCID: PMC4530813          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  12 in total

1.  The cost of radiotherapy as a function of facility size and hours of operation.

Authors:  P Dunscombe; G Roberts; J Walker
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Centralisation of cancer services in rural areas has disadvantages.

Authors:  A G Baird; C M Donnelly; N T Miscampell; H D Wemyss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

3.  Are the creation and maintenance of databases in healthcare worthwhile? An example of a unique, population-based, radiation therapy database.

Authors:  Stewart M Jackson; Scott Tyldesley; Barbara Baerg; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2012

4.  Defining the elements for successful implementation of a small-city radiotherapy department.

Authors:  P S Craighead; P Dunscombe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Does a centralized radiotherapy system provide adequate access to care?

Authors:  W J Mackillop; P A Groome; J Zhang-Solomons; Y Zhou; D Feldman-Stewart; L Paszat; P Dixon; E J Holowaty; B J Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Utilisation of radiotherapy in rural and urban areas in British Columbia compared with evidence-based estimates of radiotherapy needs for patients with breast, prostate and lung cancer.

Authors:  S Tyldesley; C McGahan
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Extended hours working in radiotherapy in the UK.

Authors:  L White; E Beckingham; F Calman; C Deehan
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Estimating the need for radiotherapy for patients with prostate, breast, and lung cancers: verification of model estimates of need with radiotherapy utilization data from British Columbia.

Authors:  Scott Tyldesley; Geoff Delaney; Farshad Foroudi; Lisa Barbera; Marc Kerba; William Mackillop
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  When would you like to be treated?--A short survey of radiotherapy outpatients.

Authors:  F Calman; L White; E Beckingham; C Deehan
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Use of single- versus multiple-fraction palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: population-based analysis of 16,898 courses in a Canadian province.

Authors:  Robert A Olson; Manpreet S Tiwana; Mark Barnes; Andrew Kiraly; Kwamena Beecham; Stacy Miller; David Hoegler; Ivo Olivotto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiotherapy treatment scheduling considering time window preferences.

Authors:  Bruno Vieira; Derya Demirtas; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Erwin W Hans; Louis-Martin Rousseau; Nadia Lahrichi; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2020-06-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.