Literature DB >> 21655152

Defining the elements for successful implementation of a small-city radiotherapy department.

P S Craighead1, P Dunscombe.   

Abstract

AIMS: Distributed delivery models for cancer care have been introduced to bring care closer to home and to provide better access to cancer patients needing radiotherapy. Very little work has been done to demonstrate the elements critical for success in a non-centralized approach. The present study set out to identify the elements that are important for implementing radiotherapy away from large cities. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This qualitative research project consisted of two separate components. In the first component, structured interviews were conducted with 5 external experts. Input on the expert responses was then sought from internal leaders in medical physics, radiation therapy, and radiation oncology. Those interviews were used to develop a proposed template of the elements needed in a small-city department. We tested the validity of all elements by surveying staff members from the radiation treatment program in Calgary, leading to a definition of the resources needed for the proposed department in Lethbridge. Seventy-five staff members contributed to the survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative research methods allowed us to define important elements for a small-city radiotherapy department and to validate those elements with a large cohort of staff working in a tertiary centre. This work has influenced the planning of a small-city department in Lethbridge, emphasizing the importance of the elements identified to the service planners. We await the completion of the construction project and the opening of the centre so that we can re-evaluate the importance of the identified elements in actual practice. We recommend such an approach to jurisdictions that are considering devolved radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Qualitative research; access; radiotherapy

Year:  2011        PMID: 21655152      PMCID: PMC3108874          DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i3.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  15 in total

1.  Infrastructure of radiotherapy in Spain: a minimal standard of radiotherapy resources.

Authors:  R Esco; A Palacios; J Pardo; A Biete; J A Carceller; C Veiras; G Vazquez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Radiotherapy and cancer care in Sweden.

Authors:  Torgil R Möller; Nina Einhorn; Christer Lindholm; Ulrik Ringborg; Hans Svensson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Geoff Delaney; Susannah Jacob; Carolyn Featherstone; Michael Barton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Resources and productivity in radiation oncology in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden during 1987.

Authors:  K Lote; T Möller; E Nordman; J Overgaard; T Sveinsson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Infrastructure for radiotherapy in The Netherlands: development from 1970 to 2010.

Authors:  W A van Daal; M A Bos
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Does a centralized radiotherapy system provide adequate access to care?

Authors:  W J Mackillop; P A Groome; J Zhang-Solomons; Y Zhou; D Feldman-Stewart; L Paszat; P Dixon; E J Holowaty; B J Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Radiotherapy in Sweden--a study of present use in relation to the literature and an estimate of future trends.

Authors:  J E Frödin; E Jonsson; T Möller; L Werkö
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen; Germaine Heeren; Brian Cottier; Ben Slotman; Bengt Glimelius; Yolande Lievens; Walter van den Bogaert
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Radiation oncology in Australia: workforce, workloads and equipment 1986-1999.

Authors:  D R Wigg; G W Morgan
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2001-05

10.  Close, but still too far. The experience of Australian people with cancer commuting from a regional to a capital city for radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  D Hegney; S Pearce; C Rogers-Clark; K Martin-McDonald; E Buikstra
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.520

View more
  4 in total

1.  Decentralisation of radiation therapy. Is it possible and beneficial to patients? Experience of the first 5 years of a satellite radiotherapy unit in the province of Tarragona, Spain.

Authors:  Meritxell Arenas; David Gomez; Sebastià Sabater; Angeles Rovirosa; Albert Biete; Jordi Colomer
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-11-08

2.  Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Receipt of Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Lin; Suanna S Bruinooge; M Kelsey Kirkwood; Dawn L Hershman; Ahmedin Jemal; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; James B Yu; Shane Hopkins; Michael Goldstein; Dean Bajorin; Sharon H Giordano; Michael Kosty; Anna Arnone; Amy Hanley; Stephanie Stevens; Christine Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Patient preferences for timing and access to radiation therapy.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; J Soo; R A Olson; L Rowe; J French; B Jensen; A Pastuch; R Halperin; P T Truong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Has Radiotherapy Been Successfully Implemented in Alberta's Small Cities? A Review of Alberta's Regional Cancer Centre Network from 2010-2020.

Authors:  Peter S Craighead; Dean Ruether; Chandra Martens; Petra Grendarova
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.