| Literature DB >> 26300640 |
Bruna Vidal Bonifácio1, Matheus Aparecido dos Santos Ramos1, Patrícia Bento da Silva2, Kamila Maria Silveira Negri1, Érica de Oliveira Lopes1, Leonardo Perez de Souza3, Wagner Vilegas4, Fernando Rogério Pavan1, Marlus Chorilli2, Taís Maria Bauab1.
Abstract
The genus Astronium (Anacardiaceae) includes species, such as Astronium fraxinifolium, Astronium graveolens, and Astronium urundeuva, which possess anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcerogenic, healing, and antimicrobial properties. Nanostructured lipid systems are able to potentiate the action of plant extracts, reducing the required dose and side effects and improving antimicrobial activity. This work aims to evaluate a nanostructured lipid system that was developed as a strategy to improve the anti-Candida albicans activity of hydroethanolic extracts of stems and leaves from Astronium sp. The antifungal activity against C. albicans (ATCC 18804) was evaluated in vitro by a microdilution technique. In addition to the in vitro assays, the Astronium sp. that showed the best antifungal activity and selectivity index was submitted to an in vivo assay using a model of vulvovaginal candidiasis infection. In these assays, the extracts were either used alone or were incorporated into the nanostructured lipid system (comprising 10% oil phase, 10% surfactant, and 80% aqueous phase). The results indicated a minimal inhibitory concentration of 125.00 µg/mL before incorporation into the nanostructured system; this activity was even more enhanced when this extract presented a minimal inhibitory concentration of 15.62 µg/mL after its incorporation. In vivo assay dates showed that the nanostructure-incorporated extract of A. urundeuva leaves was more effective than both the unincorporated extract and the antifungal positive control (amphotericin B). These results suggest that this nanostructured lipid system can be used in a strategy to improve the in vitro and in vivo anti-C. albicans activity of hydroethanolic extracts of Astronium sp.Entities:
Keywords: anticandidal activity; microdilution; microemulsion; plant extract; vulvovaginal candidiasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26300640 PMCID: PMC4536841 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S79684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Experimental groups and treatments used in the study
| Experimental groups | Specification | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Non-infected control | – |
| 2 | Infected control | – |
| 3 | Positive control (antimicrobial treatment) | 0.1 mL of antifungal cream (tetracycline + amphotericin B) |
| 4 | Solvent control | 0.1 mL of a solution (20% DMSO) |
| 5 | Treatment 1 | 0.1 mL of pure extract (250 µg/mL) |
| 6 | Vehicle control for microemulsion | 0.1 mL of microemulsion |
| 7 | Treatment 2 | 0.1 mL of extract-loaded nanostructured lipid system (250 µg/mL) |
Abbreviation: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Results of biological assessments (MIC and IC50) and determination of the SI of extracts of Astronium sp. alone (unincorporated) or incorporated into the nanostructured lipid system for Candida albicans
| Extracts | Parameters
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unincorporated
| Incorporated
| |||||
| IC50(µg/mL) | MIC (µg/mL) | SI | IC50(µg/mL) | MIC (µg/mL) | SI | |
| AFs | 767.20 | >1,000.00 | <0.76 | >1,000.00 | 62.50 | >16.00 |
| AFl | 950.00 | >1,000.00 | <0.95 | >1,000.00 | 250.00 | >4.00 |
| AGs | >1,000.00 | >1,000.00 | <1.00 | >1,000.00 | 62.50 | >16.00 |
| AGl | 833.00 | >1,000.00 | <0.83 | >1,000.00 | 125.00 | >8.00 |
| AUs | 900.00 | >1,000.00 | <0.90 | >1,000.00 | 62.50 | >16.00 |
| AUl | 536.10 | 125.00 | 4.28 | >1,000.00 | 15.62 | >64.02 |
| Amphotericin B | 0.06 | |||||
| Fluconazole | 8.00 | |||||
Abbreviations: MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; AFs, Astronium fraxinifolium stem; AFl, A. fraxinifolium leaves; AGs, A. graveolens stem; AGl, A. graveolens leaves; AUs, A. urundeuva stem; AUl, A. urundeuva leaves; SI, selectivity index.
Figure 1Pseudoternary phase diagram for the system containing SPC/Brij® 58 (S), CHO (O), and aqueous buffer (W).
Abbreviations: TLS, transparent liquid system; VOS, viscous and opaque system; PS, phase separation; TVS, transparent viscous system; VSTS, viscous semitransparent system.
Determination of the droplet size and polydispersity of the ME by light scattering
| Formulation | Mean diameter ± SD (nm) | Mean PDI ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| ME | 117.200±1.966 | 0.245±0.006 |
| AFs | 123.600±0.252 | 0.222±0.003 |
| AFl | 133.100±0.551 | 0.276±0.008 |
| AGs | 126.700±0.702 | 0.249±0.007 |
| AGl | 135.400±0.551 | 0.237±0.002 |
| AUs | 141.900±1.137 | 0.268±0.000 |
| AUl | 146.700±1.825 | 0.255±0.010 |
Note:
SD, PDI.
Abbreviations: ME, microemulsion; SD, standard deviation; PDI, polydispersity index; AFs, Astronium fraxinifolium stem; AFl, A. fraxinifolium leaves; AGs, A. graveolens stem; AGl, A. graveolens leaves; AUs, A. urundeuva stem; AUl, A. urundeuva leaves.
Figure 2Transmission electron micrographs of ME at a magnification of 400,000× (A) and 800,000× (B), respectively.
Abbreviation: ME, microemulsion.
Figure 3X-ray scattering curves for ME and ME + AUl.
Abbreviations: ME, microemulsion; AUl, A. urundeuva leaves.
Figure 4Peak of bioadhesion (N) of AUl-unloaded microemulsion and AUl-loaded microemulsion.
Note: Each value represents the mean (± standard deviation) of at least seven replicates.
Abbreviation: AUl, A. urundeuva leaves.
Fungal loads (CFUs) obtained from the culture of vaginal fluid collected during the treatment period
| Groups | Treatment
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 6 | |
| Positive control (infection) | 1,585.0±13.0 | 1,692.0±37.0 | 986.8±11.0 |
| Positive control (tetracycline + amphotericin B) | 1,600.0±9.0 | 836.0±33.0 | 264.6±23.0 |
| Solvent control (DMSO) | 1,608.0±8.0 | 1,641.0±65.0 | 982.8±18.0 |
| Treatment 1 | 1,553.0±27.0 | 776.0±73.0 | 195.6±50.0 |
| Microemulsion | 1,590.0±13.0 | 1,657.0±17.0 | 932.8±21.0 |
| Treatment 2 | 1,589.0±47.0 | 349.0±31.0 | 0.0±27.0 |
Notes:
Non-significant and
significant differences between treatments 1 and 2 according to parametric post-hoc test (P<0.05 – Tukey’s test).
Significant difference (P<0.05) when compared with the positive control group (tetracycline + amphotericin B – Dunnett’s test).
Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming unit; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.