Katie A McLaughlin1, Matthew Peverill2, Andrea L Gold3, Sonia Alves4, Margaret A Sheridan5. 1. University of Washington, Seattle. Electronic address: mclaughk@uw.edu. 2. University of Washington, Seattle. 3. National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, MD. 4. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA. 5. Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The strong associations between child maltreatment and psychopathology have generated interest in identifying neurodevelopmental processes that are disrupted following maltreatment. Previous research has focused largely on neural response to negative facial emotion. We determined whether child maltreatment was associated with neural responses during passive viewing of negative and positive emotional stimuli and effortful attempts to regulate emotional responses. METHOD: A total of 42 adolescents aged 13 to 19 years, half with exposure to physical and/or sexual abuse, participated. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response was measured during passive viewing of negative and positive emotional stimuli and attempts to modulate emotional responses using cognitive reappraisal. RESULTS: Maltreated adolescents exhibited heightened response in multiple nodes of the salience network, including amygdala, putamen, and anterior insula, to negative relative to neutral stimuli. During attempts to decrease responses to negative stimuli relative to passive viewing, maltreatment was associated with greater recruitment of superior frontal gyrus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and frontal pole; adolescents with and without maltreatment down-regulated amygdala response to a similar degree. No associations were observed between maltreatment and neural response to positive emotional stimuli during passive viewing or effortful regulation. CONCLUSION: Child maltreatment heightens the salience of negative emotional stimuli. Although maltreated adolescents modulate amygdala responses to negative cues to a degree similar to that of non-maltreated youths, they use regions involved in effortful control to a greater degree to do so, potentially because greater effort is required to modulate heightened amygdala responses. These findings are promising, given the centrality of cognitive restructuring in trauma-focused treatments for children.
OBJECTIVE: The strong associations between child maltreatment and psychopathology have generated interest in identifying neurodevelopmental processes that are disrupted following maltreatment. Previous research has focused largely on neural response to negative facial emotion. We determined whether child maltreatment was associated with neural responses during passive viewing of negative and positive emotional stimuli and effortful attempts to regulate emotional responses. METHOD: A total of 42 adolescents aged 13 to 19 years, half with exposure to physical and/or sexual abuse, participated. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response was measured during passive viewing of negative and positive emotional stimuli and attempts to modulate emotional responses using cognitive reappraisal. RESULTS: Maltreated adolescents exhibited heightened response in multiple nodes of the salience network, including amygdala, putamen, and anterior insula, to negative relative to neutral stimuli. During attempts to decrease responses to negative stimuli relative to passive viewing, maltreatment was associated with greater recruitment of superior frontal gyrus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and frontal pole; adolescents with and without maltreatment down-regulated amygdala response to a similar degree. No associations were observed between maltreatment and neural response to positive emotional stimuli during passive viewing or effortful regulation. CONCLUSION:Child maltreatment heightens the salience of negative emotional stimuli. Although maltreated adolescents modulate amygdala responses to negative cues to a degree similar to that of non-maltreated youths, they use regions involved in effortful control to a greater degree to do so, potentially because greater effort is required to modulate heightened amygdala responses. These findings are promising, given the centrality of cognitive restructuring in trauma-focused treatments for children.
Authors: K M Thomas; W C Drevets; R E Dahl; N D Ryan; B Birmaher; C H Eccard; D Axelson; P J Whalen; B J Casey Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-11
Authors: Katie A McLaughlin; Laura D Kubzansky; Erin C Dunn; Robert Waldinger; George Vaillant; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Krzysztof Gorgolewski; Christopher D Burns; Cindee Madison; Dav Clark; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Michael L Waskom; Satrajit S Ghosh Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Katie A McLaughlin; Daniel S Busso; Andrea Duys; Jennifer Greif Green; Sonia Alves; Marcus Way; Margaret A Sheridan Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Katie A McLaughlin; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-11
Authors: Michelle R Vantieghem; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Bonnie Goff; Jessica Flannery; Kathryn L Humphreys; Eva H Telzer; Christina Caldera; Jennifer Y Louie; Mor Shapiro; Niall Bolger; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2017-05
Authors: Daniel S Busso; Katie A McLaughlin; Stephanie Brueck; Matthew Peverill; Andrea L Gold; Margaret A Sheridan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Adam Bryant Miller; Tory Eisenlohr-Moul; Matteo Giletta; Paul D Hastings; Karen D Rudolph; Matthew K Nock; Mitchell J Prinstein Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2017-04-20
Authors: Yvette Z Szabo; Tessa Breeding; Christina Hejl; Rakeshwar S Guleria; Steven M Nelson; Laura Zambrano-Vazquez Journal: J Dual Diagn Date: 2020-06-04