Literature DB >> 26299170

Choosing conservative therapy in chronic kidney disease.

José Luis Teruel1, Víctor Burguera Vion2, Antonio Gomis Couto2, Maite Rivera Gorrín2, Milagros Fernández-Lucas2, Nuria Rodríguez Mendiola2, Carlos Quereda2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Incidence of use for various renal replacement therapies is well-known, but no data are available on conservative treatment use.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients with chronic kidney failure receiving a conservative treatment.
RESULTS: From July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, 232 patients with stage 5 CKD were seen in the Nephrology Department. After having received information on existing therapeutic options and having known the opinion of their treating physicians, 81 patients (35%) selected hemodialysis, 56 (24%) preferred peritoneal dialysis, 5 (2%) selected a preemptive transplant from a living donor, and in 90 (39%) a conservative treatment option was selected. In a univariate analysis using logistic regression, variables associated to a preference for conservative treatment were age, Charlson index excluding age, degree of walking difficulties, and functional dependence level, with the first three factors achieving statistical significance in a multivariate analysis. Presence of a severe disease resulting in a poor prognosis was the main reason for selecting a conservative treatment (49%), with the second one being patient refusal to receive a renal replacement therapy (26%). Mortality rate was 8.2/100 patient-months in conservative therapy group versus 0.6/100 patient-months in patients receiving renal replacement therapy (P<.001). In patients receiving conservative therapy, baseline glomerular filtration rate at the time of study enrollment was the sole variable showing a significant impact on survival.
CONCLUSIONS: About 39% of patients with stage 5 CKD seen over a 1-year period in the Nephrology Department received conservative therapy. Age, co-morbidity, and functional disability were the factors associated to selecting a conservative therapy option.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservative therapy; Enfermedad renal crónica en estadio 5; Stage 5 chronic kidney disease; Tratamiento conservador

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26299170     DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nefrologia        ISSN: 0211-6995            Impact factor:   2.033


  5 in total

1.  Experiences of US Nephrologists in the Delivery of Conservative Care to Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease: A National Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Susan P Y Wong; Saritha Boyapati; Ruth A Engelberg; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Janelle S Taylor; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  End-of-Life Care for Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Susan P Y Wong; Margaret K Yu; Pamela K Green; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Survival of patients who opt for dialysis versus conservative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlijn G N Voorend; Mathijs van Oevelen; Wouter R Verberne; Iris D van den Wittenboer; Olaf M Dekkers; Friedo Dekker; Alferso C Abrahams; Marjolijn van Buren; Simon P Mooijaart; Willem Jan W Bos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 7.186

4.  Effect of the combination of bumetanide plus chlorthalidone on hypertension and volume overload in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4-5 KDIGO without renal replacement therapy: a double-blind randomized HEBE-CKD trial.

Authors:  Fabio Solis-Jimenez; Lucia Monserrat Perez-Navarro; Ricardo Cabrera-Barron; Jesus Antonio Chida-Romero; Geovana Martin-Alemañy; Edgar Dehesa-López; Magdalena Madero; Rafael Valdez-Ortiz
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.585

5.  Does conservative kidney management offer a quantity or quality of life benefit compared to dialysis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Buur Louise Engelbrecht; Madsen Jens Kristian; Eidemak Inge; Krarup Elizabeth; Lauridsen Thomas Guldager; Taasti Lena Helbo; Finderup Jeanette
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.