Susan P Y Wong1, Margaret K Yu2, Pamela K Green3, Chuan-Fen Liu4, Paul L Hebert4, Ann M O'Hare5. 1. Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: spywong@uw.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. 3. Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA. 4. Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Health Service Research and Development Center of Innovation, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about patterns of end-of-life care for patients with advanced kidney disease not treated with maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 14,071 patients with sustained estimated glomerular filtration rates < 15mL/min/1.73m2 treated in the US Veterans Affairs health care system who died during 2000 to 2011. Before death, 12,756 of these patients had been treated with dialysis, 503 had been discussing and/or preparing for dialysis therapy, and for 812, there had been a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy. OUTCOMES: Hospitalization and receipt of an intensive procedure during the final month of life, in-hospital death, and palliative care consultation and hospice enrollment before death. RESULTS: Compared with decedents treated with dialysis, those for whom a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy had been made were less often hospitalized (57.3% vs 76.8%; OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.34-0.46]), less often the recipient of an intensive procedure (3.5% vs 24.6%; OR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.10-0.22]), more often the recipient of a palliative care consultation (52.6% vs 21.6%; OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 3.58-4.90]), more often used hospice services (38.7% vs 18.2%; OR, 3.32 [95% CI, 2.83-3.89]), and died less frequently in a hospital (41.4% vs 57.3%; OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.74-0.82]). Hospitalization (55.5%; OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.32-0.46]), receipt of an intensive procedure (13.7%; OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.77]), and in-hospital death (39.0%; OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.56]) were also less common among decedents who had been discussing and/or preparing for dialysis therapy, but their use of palliative care and hospice services was similar. LIMITATIONS: Findings may not be generalizable to groups not well represented in the Veterans Affairs health care system. CONCLUSIONS: Among decedents, patients not treated with dialysis before death received less intensive patterns of end-of-life care than those treated with dialysis. Decedents for whom there had been a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy before death were more likely to receive palliative care and hospice. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about patterns of end-of-life care for patients with advanced kidney disease not treated with maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 14,071 patients with sustained estimated glomerular filtration rates < 15mL/min/1.73m2 treated in the US Veterans Affairs health care system who died during 2000 to 2011. Before death, 12,756 of these patients had been treated with dialysis, 503 had been discussing and/or preparing for dialysis therapy, and for 812, there had been a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy. OUTCOMES: Hospitalization and receipt of an intensive procedure during the final month of life, in-hospital death, and palliative care consultation and hospice enrollment before death. RESULTS: Compared with decedents treated with dialysis, those for whom a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy had been made were less often hospitalized (57.3% vs 76.8%; OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.34-0.46]), less often the recipient of an intensive procedure (3.5% vs 24.6%; OR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.10-0.22]), more often the recipient of a palliative care consultation (52.6% vs 21.6%; OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 3.58-4.90]), more often used hospice services (38.7% vs 18.2%; OR, 3.32 [95% CI, 2.83-3.89]), and died less frequently in a hospital (41.4% vs 57.3%; OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.74-0.82]). Hospitalization (55.5%; OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.32-0.46]), receipt of an intensive procedure (13.7%; OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.77]), and in-hospital death (39.0%; OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.56]) were also less common among decedents who had been discussing and/or preparing for dialysis therapy, but their use of palliative care and hospice services was similar. LIMITATIONS: Findings may not be generalizable to groups not well represented in the Veterans Affairs health care system. CONCLUSIONS: Among decedents, patients not treated with dialysis before death received less intensive patterns of end-of-life care than those treated with dialysis. Decedents for whom there had been a decision not to pursue dialysis therapy before death were more likely to receive palliative care and hospice. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD); conservative care; dialysis; end-of-life care; health care intensity; hospice; intensive treatment; kidney failure; palliative care
Authors: Rachael L Morton; Angela C Webster; Kevin McGeechan; Kirsten Howard; Fliss E M Murtagh; Nicholas A Gray; Peter G Kerr; Michael J Germain; Paul Snelling Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Vanessa Grubbs; Alvin H Moss; Lewis M Cohen; Michael J Fischer; Michael J Germain; S Vanita Jassal; Jeffrey Perl; Daniel E Weiner; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Chun Keung Shum; Kui Fu Tam; Wai Leung Chak; Tuen Ching Chan; Ying Fai Mak; Ka Foon Chau Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Shahid M Chandna; Maria Da Silva-Gane; Catherine Marshall; Paul Warwicker; Roger N Greenwood; Ken Farrington Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Claire A Richards; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Lynn F Reinke; Leslie L Taylor; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Natalie C Ernecoff; Alexandra E Bursic; Erica M Motter; Keith Lagnese; Robert Taylor; Jane O Schell Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 14.978
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Catherine R Butler; Janelle S Taylor; Susan P Y Wong; Elizabeth K Vig; Ryan S Laundry; Melissa W Wachterman; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Claire A Richards Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Nwamaka D Eneanya; Shananssa G Percy; Taylor L Stallings; Wei Wang; David J R Steele; Michael J Germain; Jane O Schell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Angelo E Volandes Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Susan P Y Wong; Lynne V McFarland; Chuan-Fen Liu; Ryan J Laundry; Paul L Hebert; Ann M O'Hare Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Catherine R Butler; Elizabeth K Vig; Ann M O'Hare; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Susan P Y Wong Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carlijn G N Voorend; Mathijs van Oevelen; Wouter R Verberne; Iris D van den Wittenboer; Olaf M Dekkers; Friedo Dekker; Alferso C Abrahams; Marjolijn van Buren; Simon P Mooijaart; Willem Jan W Bos Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 7.186