Literature DB >> 26297734

The Estrogen Receptor Cofactor SPEN Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Candidate Biomarker of Drug Responsiveness in Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancers.

Stéphanie Légaré1, Luca Cavallone2, Aline Mamo2, Catherine Chabot2, Isabelle Sirois1, Anthony Magliocco3, Alexander Klimowicz3, Patricia N Tonin4, Marguerite Buchanan2, Dana Keilty1, Saima Hassan1, David Laperrière5, Sylvie Mader6, Olga Aleynikova7, Mark Basik8.   

Abstract

The treatment of breast cancer has benefitted tremendously from the generation of estrogen receptor-α (ERα)-targeted therapies, but disease relapse continues to pose a challenge due to intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. In an effort to delineate potential predictive biomarkers of therapy responsiveness, multiple groups have identified several uncharacterized cofactors and interacting partners of ERα, including Split Ends (SPEN), a transcriptional corepressor. Here, we demonstrate a role for SPEN in ERα-expressing breast cancers. SPEN nonsense mutations were detectable in the ERα-expressing breast cancer cell line T47D and corresponded to undetectable protein levels. Further analysis of 101 primary breast tumors revealed that 23% displayed loss of heterozygosity at the SPEN locus and that 3% to 4% harbored somatically acquired mutations. A combination of in vitro and in vivo functional assays with microarray-based pathway analyses showed that SPEN functions as a tumor suppressor to regulate cell proliferation, tumor growth, and survival. We also found that SPEN binds ERα in a ligand-independent manner and negatively regulates the transcription of ERα targets. Moreover, we demonstrate that SPEN overexpression sensitizes hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cells to the apoptotic effects of tamoxifen, but has no effect on responsiveness to fulvestrant. Consistent with these findings, two independent datasets revealed that high SPEN protein and RNA expression in ERα-positive breast tumors predicted favorable outcome in patients treated with tamoxifen alone. Together, our data suggest that SPEN is a novel tumor-suppressor gene that may be clinically useful as a predictive biomarker of tamoxifen response in ERα-positive breast cancers. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26297734     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mixed signals from the cell's antennae: primary cilia in cancer.

Authors:  Thibaut Eguether; Michael Hahne
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Minireview: The Link Between ERα Corepressors and Histone Deacetylases in Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Stéphanie Légaré; Mark Basik
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-20

3.  Panel sequencing of 264 candidate susceptibility genes and segregation analysis in a cohort of non-BRCA1, non-BRCA2 breast cancer families.

Authors:  Jun Li; Hongyan Li; Igor Makunin; Bryony A Thompson; Kayoko Tao; Erin L Young; Jacqueline Lopez; Nicola J Camp; Sean V Tavtigian; Esther M John; Irene L Andrulis; Kum Kum Khanna; David Goldgar; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Genomic-Epidemiologic Evidence That Estrogens Promote Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Fritz F Parl; Philip S Crooke; W Dale Plummer; William D Dupont
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  SPEN haploinsufficiency causes a neurodevelopmental disorder overlapping proximal 1p36 deletion syndrome with an episignature of X chromosomes in females.

Authors:  Francesca Clementina Radio; Kaifang Pang; Andrea Ciolfi; Michael A Levy; Andrés Hernández-García; Lucia Pedace; Francesca Pantaleoni; Zhandong Liu; Elke de Boer; Adam Jackson; Alessandro Bruselles; Haley McConkey; Emilia Stellacci; Stefania Lo Cicero; Marialetizia Motta; Rosalba Carrozzo; Maria Lisa Dentici; Kirsty McWalter; Megha Desai; Kristin G Monaghan; Aida Telegrafi; Christophe Philippe; Antonio Vitobello; Margaret Au; Katheryn Grand; Pedro A Sanchez-Lara; Joanne Baez; Kristin Lindstrom; Peggy Kulch; Jessica Sebastian; Suneeta Madan-Khetarpal; Chelsea Roadhouse; Jennifer J MacKenzie; Berrin Monteleone; Carol J Saunders; July K Jean Cuevas; Laura Cross; Dihong Zhou; Taila Hartley; Sarah L Sawyer; Fabíola Paoli Monteiro; Tania Vertemati Secches; Fernando Kok; Laura E Schultz-Rogers; Erica L Macke; Eva Morava; Eric W Klee; Jennifer Kemppainen; Maria Iascone; Angelo Selicorni; Romano Tenconi; David J Amor; Lynn Pais; Lyndon Gallacher; Peter D Turnpenny; Karen Stals; Sian Ellard; Sara Cabet; Gaetan Lesca; Joset Pascal; Katharina Steindl; Sarit Ravid; Karin Weiss; Alison M R Castle; Melissa T Carter; Louisa Kalsner; Bert B A de Vries; Bregje W van Bon; Marijke R Wevers; Rolph Pfundt; Alexander P A Stegmann; Bronwyn Kerr; Helen M Kingston; Kate E Chandler; Willow Sheehan; Abdallah F Elias; Deepali N Shinde; Meghan C Towne; Nathaniel H Robin; Dana Goodloe; Adeline Vanderver; Omar Sherbini; Krista Bluske; R Tanner Hagelstrom; Caterina Zanus; Flavio Faletra; Luciana Musante; Evangeline C Kurtz-Nelson; Rachel K Earl; Britt-Marie Anderlid; Gilles Morin; Marjon van Slegtenhorst; Karin E M Diderich; Alice S Brooks; Joost Gribnau; Ruben G Boers; Teresa Robert Finestra; Lauren B Carter; Anita Rauch; Paolo Gasparini; Kym M Boycott; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; John M Graham; Laurence Faivre; Siddharth Banka; Tianyun Wang; Evan E Eichler; Manuela Priolo; Bruno Dallapiccola; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bekim Sadikovic; Daryl A Scott; Jimmy Lloyd Holder; Marco Tartaglia
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genetic Alteration and Their Significance on Clinical Events in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Shuyue Jiao; Xin Zhang; Dapeng Wang; Hongyong Fu; Qingxin Xia
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.602

7.  Association of Somatic Driver Alterations With Prognosis in Postmenopausal, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BIG 1-98 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Luen; Rebecca Asher; Chee Khoon Lee; Peter Savas; Roswitha Kammler; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Olivia Maria Biasi; David Demanse; Lellean JeBailey; Sinead Dolan; Wolfgang Hackl; Beat Thuerlimann; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni; Meredith M Regan; Sherene Loi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Genomic and epigenetic aberrations of chromosome 1p36.13 have prognostic implications in malignancies.

Authors:  Ali Naderi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  A pan-cancer transcriptome analysis of exitron splicing identifies novel cancer driver genes and neoepitopes.

Authors:  Ting-You Wang; Qi Liu; Yanan Ren; Sk Kayum Alam; Li Wang; Zhu Zhu; Luke H Hoeppner; Scott M Dehm; Qi Cao; Rendong Yang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Cell-free DNA captures tumor heterogeneity and driver alterations in rapid autopsies with pre-treated metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Pereira; Christopher T Chen; Lipika Goyal; Charlotte Walmsley; Christopher J Pinto; Islam Baiev; Read Allen; Laura Henderson; Supriya Saha; Stephanie Reyes; Martin S Taylor; Donna M Fitzgerald; Maida Williams Broudo; Avinash Sahu; Xin Gao; Wendy Winckler; A Rose Brannon; Jeffrey A Engelman; Rebecca Leary; James R Stone; Catarina D Campbell; Dejan Juric
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.