Literature DB >> 26295923

A Bayesian joint model of menstrual cycle length and fecundity.

Kirsten J Lum1, Rajeshwari Sundaram2, Germaine M Buck Louis2, Thomas A Louis3.   

Abstract

Menstrual cycle length (MCL) has been shown to play an important role in couple fecundity, which is the biologic capacity for reproduction irrespective of pregnancy intentions. However, a comprehensive assessment of its role requires a fecundity model that accounts for male and female attributes and the couple's intercourse pattern relative to the ovulation day. To this end, we employ a Bayesian joint model for MCL and pregnancy. MCLs follow a scale multiplied (accelerated) mixture model with Gaussian and Gumbel components; the pregnancy model includes MCL as a covariate and computes the cycle-specific probability of pregnancy in a menstrual cycle conditional on the pattern of intercourse and no previous fertilization. Day-specific fertilization probability is modeled using natural, cubic splines. We analyze data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment Study (the LIFE Study), a couple based prospective pregnancy study, and find a statistically significant quadratic relation between fecundity and menstrual cycle length, after adjustment for intercourse pattern and other attributes, including male semen quality, both partner's age, and active smoking status (determined by baseline cotinine level 100 ng/mL). We compare results to those produced by a more basic model and show the advantages of a more comprehensive approach.
© 2015, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; Fecundity modeling; Joint model; Length-bias; Scaled mixture model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26295923      PMCID: PMC4761533          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  A new approach to modeling daily probabilities of conception.

Authors:  P Royston; A Ferreira
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A joint mixed effects dispersion model for menstrual cycle length and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Kirsten J Lum; Rajeshwari Sundaram
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cotinine in the serum, saliva, and urine of nonsmokers, passive smokers, and active smokers.

Authors:  M A Wall; J Johnson; P Jacob; N L Benowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Effective communication of standard errors and confidence intervals.

Authors:  Thomas A Louis; Scott L Zeger
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Linear mixed models with heterogeneous within-cluster variances.

Authors:  X Lin; J Raz; S D Harlow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; B C Gladen; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Analysis of menstrual diary data across the reproductive life span applicability of the bipartite model approach and the importance of within-woman variance.

Authors:  S D Harlow; X Lin; M J Ho
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Menstrual cycle pattern and fertility: a prospective follow-up study of pregnancy and early embryonal loss in 295 couples who were planning their first pregnancy.

Authors:  H A Kolstad; J P Bonde; N H Hjøllund; T K Jensen; T B Henriksen; E Ernst; A Giwercman; N E Skakkebaek; J Olsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A Model-Based Approach to Detection Limits in Studying Environmental Exposures and Human Fecundity.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-07

3.  Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals, Menstrual Cycle Length, and Fecundity: Findings from a Prospective Pregnancy Study.

Authors:  Kirsten J Lum; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Dana B Barr; Thomas A Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The forecasting of menstruation based on a state-space modeling of basal body temperature time series.

Authors:  Keiichi Fukaya; Ai Kawamori; Yutaka Osada; Masumi Kitazawa; Makio Ishiguro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.373

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.