Literature DB >> 26294685

Scoring criteria for portable monitor recordings: a comparison of four hypopnoea definitions in a population-based cohort.

Sopharat Vat1, Jose Haba-Rubio2, Mehdi Tafti3, Nadia Tobback2, Daniela Andries2, Raphael Heinzer4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Limited-channel portable monitors (PMs) are increasingly used as an alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, recommendations for the scoring of PM recordings are still lacking. Pulse-wave amplitude (PWA) drops, considered as surrogates for EEG arousals, may increase the detection sensitivity for respiratory events in PM recordings.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of four different hypopnoea scoring criteria, using 3% or 4% oxygen desaturation levels, including or not PWA drops as surrogates for EEG arousals, and to determine the impact of measured versus reported sleep time on OSA diagnosis.
METHODS: Subjects drawn from a population-based cohort underwent a complete home PSG. The PSG recordings were scored using the 2012 American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria to determine the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). Recordings were then rescored using only parameters available on type 3 PM devices according to different hypopnoea criteria and patients-reported sleep duration to determine the 'portable monitor AHIs' (PM-AHIs). MAIN
RESULTS: 312 subjects were included. Overall, PM-AHIs showed a good concordance with the PSG-based AHI although it tended to slightly underestimate it. The PM-AHI using 3% desaturation without PWA drops showed the best diagnostic accuracy for AHI thresholds of ≥ 5/h and ≥ 15/h (correctly classifying 94.55% and 93.27% of subjects, respectively, vs 80.13% and 87.50% with PWA drops). There was a significant but modest correlation between PWA drops and EEG arousals (r=0.20, p=0.0004).
CONCLUSION: Interpretation of PM recordings using hypopnoea criteria which include 3% desaturation without PWA drops as EEG arousal surrogate showed the best diagnosis accuracy compared with full PSG. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Equipment Evaluations; Respiratory Measurement; Sleep apnoea

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26294685     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  11 in total

1.  A Step Forward for Better Interpreting the Apnea-Hypopnea Index.

Authors:  Ramon Farre; Miguel Angel Martínez-García; Francisco Campos-Rodriguez; Josep M Montserrat
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Apnoea and hypopnoea scoring for people with spinal cord injury: new thresholds for sleep disordered breathing diagnosis and severity classification.

Authors:  Rachel Schembri; Marnie Graco; Jo Spong; Warren R Ruehland; Julie Tolson; Peter D Rochford; Brett Duce; Bronwyn Stevens; David J Berlowitz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Validation of NoSAS score for screening of sleep-disordered breathing in a multiethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Adeline Tan; Yueheng Hong; Linda W L Tan; Rob M van Dam; Yan Yi Cheung; Chi-Hang Lee
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Accuracy of portable devices in sleep apnea using oximetry-derived heart rate increases as a surrogate arousal marker.

Authors:  Philippe Lachapelle; Juan Cascon; Sushmita Pamidi; R John Kimoff
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Using the Berlin Questionnaire to Predict Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the General Population.

Authors:  Adeline Tan; Jason D C Yin; Linda W L Tan; Rob M van Dam; Yan Yi Cheung; Chi-Hang Lee
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Evaluating the performance of five scoring systems for prescreening obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

Authors:  Wenjing Wang; Shan Yuan; Jehane Michael Le Grange; Haiying Zheng; Tianci Yao; Wei Peng; Jinnong Zhang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Validation of the NoSAS Score for the Screening of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in a Sleep Clinic.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Shihan Wang; Hui Wang; Feng Wang; Jingjing Tang; Xiuhong Kang; Guangxi Li; Zhiguo Liu
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.409

8.  Usefulness of Home Overnight Pulse Oximetry in Patients with Suspected Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

Authors:  Cristina Esteban-Amarilla; Silvia Martin-Bote; Antonio Jurado-Garcia; Ana Palomares-Muriana; Nuria Feu-Collado; Bernabe Jurado-Gamez
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.409

9.  Pulse wave amplitude drops during sleep: clinical significance and characteristics in a general population sample.

Authors:  Camila Hirotsu; Monica Betta; Giulio Bernardi; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Vincent Pichot; Frederic Roche; Francesca Siclari; Jose Haba-Rubio; Raphael Heinzer
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Autonomic Arousals as Surrogates for Cortical Arousals Caused by Respiratory Events: A Methodological Optimization Study in the Diagnosis of Sleep Breathing Disorders.

Authors:  Pierre Mayer; Alberto Herrero Babiloni; Jean-Louis Aubé; Zeina Kaddaha; Serguei Marshansky; Pierre H Rompré; Vincent Jobin; Gilles J Lavigne
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2019-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.