Rachel Schembri1,2, Marnie Graco3,4, Jo Spong4,5, Warren R Ruehland4, Julie Tolson4, Peter D Rochford4, Brett Duce6,7, Bronwyn Stevens4, David J Berlowitz3,4. 1. University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Melbourne, Australia. rachel.schembri@austin.org.au. 2. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. rachel.schembri@austin.org.au. 3. University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. 5. College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia. 6. Sleep Disorders Centre, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 7. Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of respiratory event rule-set changes on the apnoea hypopnoea index, and diagnostic and severity thresholds in people with acute and chronic spinal cord injury. SETTING: Eleven acute spinal cord injury inpatient hospitals across Australia, New Zealand, Canada and England; community dwelling chronic spinal cord injury patients in their own homes. METHODS: Polysomnography of people with acute (n = 24) and chronic (n = 78) tetraplegia were reanalysed from 1999 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) respiratory scoring, to 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 2012 AASM respectively. Equivalent cut points for published 1999 AASM sleep disordered breathing severity ranges were calculated using receiver operator curves, and results presented alongside analyses from the able-bodied. RESULTS: In people with tetraplegia, shift from 1999 AASM to 2007 AASM 'alternative' resulted in a 22% lower apnoea hypopnoea index, and to 2012 AASM a 17% lower index. In people with tetraplegia, equivalent cut-points for 1999 AASM severities of 5,15 and 30 were calculated at 2.4, 8.1 and 16.3 for 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 3.2, 10.0 and 21.2 for 2012 AASM. CONCLUSION: Interpreting research, prevalence and clinical polysomnography results conducted over different periods requires knowledge of the relationship between different rule-sets, and appropriate thresholds for diagnosis of disease. SPONSORSHIP: This project was proudly supported by the Traffic Accident Commission (Program grant) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (PhD stipend 616605).
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of respiratory event rule-set changes on the apnoea hypopnoea index, and diagnostic and severity thresholds in people with acute and chronic spinal cord injury. SETTING: Eleven acute spinal cord injury inpatient hospitals across Australia, New Zealand, Canada and England; community dwelling chronic spinal cord injurypatients in their own homes. METHODS: Polysomnography of people with acute (n = 24) and chronic (n = 78) tetraplegia were reanalysed from 1999 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) respiratory scoring, to 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 2012 AASM respectively. Equivalent cut points for published 1999 AASM sleep disordered breathing severity ranges were calculated using receiver operator curves, and results presented alongside analyses from the able-bodied. RESULTS: In people with tetraplegia, shift from 1999 AASM to 2007 AASM 'alternative' resulted in a 22% lower apnoea hypopnoea index, and to 2012 AASM a 17% lower index. In people with tetraplegia, equivalent cut-points for 1999 AASM severities of 5,15 and 30 were calculated at 2.4, 8.1 and 16.3 for 2007 AASM 'alternative' and 3.2, 10.0 and 21.2 for 2012 AASM. CONCLUSION: Interpreting research, prevalence and clinical polysomnography results conducted over different periods requires knowledge of the relationship between different rule-sets, and appropriate thresholds for diagnosis of disease. SPONSORSHIP: This project was proudly supported by the Traffic Accident Commission (Program grant) and the National Health and Medical Research Council (PhD stipend 616605).
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Pietro Memmo; Nancy Kim; Denise Campagnolo; Scott Millis Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Neil R Ward; Vitor Roldao; Martin R Cowie; Stuart D Rosen; Theresa A McDonagh; Anita K Simonds; Mary J Morrell Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Marnie Graco; Rachel Schembri; Susan Cross; Chinnaya Thiyagarajan; Shirin Shafazand; Najib T Ayas; Mark S Nash; Viet H Vu; Warren R Ruehland; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; Peter Rochford; Thomas Churchward; Sally E Green; David J Berlowitz Journal: Thorax Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Laura Gainche; David J Berlowitz; Mariannick LeGuen; Warren R Ruehland; Fergal J O'Donoghue; John Trinder; Marnie Graco; Rachel Schembri; Danny J Eckert; Peter D Rochford; Amy S Jordan Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: David J Berlowitz; Najib Ayas; Maree Barnes; Douglas J Brown; Peter A Cistulli; Tim Geraghty; Alison Graham; Bonsan Bonne Lee; Meg Morris; Fergal O'Donoghue; Peter D Rochford; Jack Ross; Balraj Singhal; Jo Spong; Brooke Wadsworth; Robert J Pierce Journal: Trials Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 2.279