| Literature DB >> 26294666 |
María Olmedo1, Mirjam Geibel2, Marta Artal-Sanz3, Martha Merrow4.
Abstract
Caenorhabditis elegans postembryonic development consists of four discrete larval stages separated by molts. Typically, the speed of progression through these larval stages is investigated by visual inspection of the molting process. Here, we describe an automated method to monitor the timing of these discrete phases of C. elegans maturation, from the first larval stage through adulthood, using bioluminescence. The method was validated with a lin-42 mutant strain that shows delayed development relative to wild-type animals and with a daf-2 mutant that shows an extended second larval stage. This new method is inherently high-throughput and will finally allow dissecting the molecular machinery governing the speed of the developmental clock, which has so far been hampered by the lack of a method suitable for genetic screens.Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; bioluminescence; development; larval molt; luciferase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26294666 PMCID: PMC4596660 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetics ISSN: 0016-6731 Impact factor: 4.562
Figure 3Developmental timing in lin-42 (ok2385) and daf-2 (e1370) mutants. (A) Average duration of development for N2 (n = 37) and lin-42 (n = 33) at 21.5°. Only three larval stages and molts are represented for lin-42 (see text). Red represents the molts as inferred by low LUC signal. Error bars represent the SD of the duration of each interval. (B) Duration of larval stages (L1–L4) and molts (M1–M4) for N2 and lin-42. Average of each stage is represented by a black horizontal bar. The duration of all stages is significantly different between the N2 and lin-42 backgrounds (***P < 0.001; *P < 0.05). Only nine lin-42 (ok2385) animals progress through a fourth molt. (C) Ratio of the duration of each stage of development comparing lin-42 (ok2385) and N2 backgrounds. (D) Average duration of development for N2 (n = 20) and daf-2 (n = 22) at 19.5°, the permissive temperature for the e1370 mutation. Red represents the molts. Error bars represent the SD of the duration of each interval. (E) Duration of larval stages and molts for N2 and daf-2. Average of each stage is represented by a black horizontal bar. The duration of all stages is significantly different between the N2 and daf-2 backgrounds (***P < 0.001). (F) Ratio between daf-2 (e1370) and N2 of the duration of each stage of development.
Figure 1Luminescence signal reports larval development of single animals and populations. (A) Bioluminescence from a single animal (LUC::GFP reporter; strain PE255) over 54 h at 21.5° as it develops from arrested L1 to adult. The absence of substrate intake during the molts provokes a decrease in the bioluminescence signal. (B) Heat map showing trend-corrected data for 37 independently monitored animals. (C) Raw data for 20 animals in one well are compared with the signal from a single animal (as in Figure 1A). (D) Fluorescence and luminescence of a population of animals grown at 20.5° during late L1 to early L2. The graph shows data from three experimental replicates, each of which was derived from three to four replicate wells; error bars show SEM.
Figure 2Quantitative analysis of the developmental program of C. elegans at 21.5° based on luminescence. Duration of larval stages (L1–L4) (A), molts (M1–M4) (B), and ratio between the duration of each molt and its preceding larval stage (C) for strain PE255. Duration of larval stages (L1–L4) (D), molts (M1–M4) (E), and ratio between the duration of each molt and its preceding larval stage (F) for strain PE254. Average is represented with a black horizontal bar.