Literature DB >> 26294059

Preoperative Intrasac Thrombus Load Predicts Worse Outcome after Elective Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Pasqualino Sirignano1, Danilo Menna2, Laura Capoccia2, Nunzio Montelione2, Wassim Mansour2, Anna Rita Rizzo2, Enrico Sbarigia2, Francesco Speziale2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of two-dimensional and three-dimensional preoperative morphologic features analyzed on computed tomography (CT) angiography on midterm outcome in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected database. Morphologic features considered as potentially influencing outcomes were maximum aortic diameter, thrombus area, overall aneurysm volume, and intrasac thrombus volume. Outcome measures were all perioperative and midterm AAA-related reinterventions and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Investigators reviewed 191 preoperative CT angiography scans. Mean maximum aortic diameter was 58 mm; thrombus area, 49.6%; aortic volume, 159.36 cm(3); and thrombus volume, 58.6%. Technical success was achieved in all cases. No reintervention was required in the perioperative period, and there was no perioperative mortality. At a mean follow-up of 32 months ± 16.8 (range, 3-66 mo), mortality rate was 9.4%, AAA-related death was 0, and reintervention rate was 8.9%. Causes of reintervention included type I endoleak (n = 3 [1.6%]), type II endoleak (n = 7 [3.7%]), type III endoleak (n = 1 [0.5%]), endograft limb thrombosis (n = 4 [2.1%]), and access vessel thrombosis (n = 2; 1%). Greater thrombus area (> 60%) and thrombus volume (> 59%) were predictors for reintervention (P = .005 and P = .0034). Greater maximum aortic diameter (> 59 mm) and aortic volume (> 159 cm(3)) were related to higher reintervention rate without statistical significance (P = .62 and P = .12). Aortic volume was a predictor of any adverse event, reintervention, and all-cause mortality after EVAR (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus area and volume are related to higher rates of reintervention. Maximum aortic diameter was related to a higher reintervention rate, but this was not significant.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26294059     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: the Year in Review.

Authors:  John E O'Mara; Robert M Bersin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-08

2.  Assessing volumetric changes in abdominal aortic aneurysms following endovascular repair.

Authors:  Yalçın Gunerhan; Mehmet Isik; Yüksel Dereli; Omer Tanyeli; Cengiz Kadıyoran; Mehmet Sinan Iyisoy; Niyazi Gormus
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Aortic sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair: volume-related changes and the impact of intraluminal thrombus.

Authors:  Arminas Skrebunas; Givi Lengvenis; Inga Urte Builyte; Ruta Zulpaite; Rytis Bliudzius; Tomas Baltrunas; Nerijus Misonis; Germanas Marinskis
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Incidence and Fate of Refractory Type II Endoleak after EVAR: A Retrospective Experience of Two High-Volume Italian Centers.

Authors:  Pasqualino Sirignano; Nicola Mangialardi; Martina Nespola; Francesco Aloisi; Matteo Orrico; Sonia Ronchey; Flavia Del Porto; Maurizio Taurino
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.