Jie Dong1, Yan-Jun Li2, Rong Xu2, Zhi-Kai Yang2, Ying-Dong Zheng3. 1. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China dongjie@medmail.com.cn. 2. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital Institute of Nephrology, Peking University Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: ♦ OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate equations for estimating lean body mass (LBM) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. ♦ METHODS: Two equations for estimating LBM, one based on mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and hand grip strength (HGS), i.e., LBM-M-H, and the other based on HGS, i.e., LBM-H, were developed and validated with LBM obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The developed equations were compared to LBM estimated from creatinine kinetics (LBM-CK) and anthropometry (LBM-A) in terms of bias, precision, and accuracy. The prognostic values of LBM estimated from the equations in all-cause mortality risk were assessed. ♦ RESULTS: The developed equations incorporated gender, height, weight, and dialysis duration. Compared to LBM-DEXA, the bias of the developed equations was lower than that of LBM-CK and LBM-A. Additionally, LBM-M-H and LBM-H had better accuracy and precision. The prognostic values of LBM in all-cause mortality risk based on LBM-M-H, LBM-H, LBM-CK, and LBM-A were similar. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Lean body mass estimated by the new equations based on MAMC and HGS was correlated with LBM obtained by DEXA and may serve as practical surrogate markers of LBM in PD patients.
UNLABELLED: ♦ OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate equations for estimating lean body mass (LBM) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. ♦ METHODS: Two equations for estimating LBM, one based on mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and hand grip strength (HGS), i.e., LBM-M-H, and the other based on HGS, i.e., LBM-H, were developed and validated with LBM obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The developed equations were compared to LBM estimated from creatinine kinetics (LBM-CK) and anthropometry (LBM-A) in terms of bias, precision, and accuracy. The prognostic values of LBM estimated from the equations in all-cause mortality risk were assessed. ♦ RESULTS: The developed equations incorporated gender, height, weight, and dialysis duration. Compared to LBM-DEXA, the bias of the developed equations was lower than that of LBM-CK and LBM-A. Additionally, LBM-M-H and LBM-H had better accuracy and precision. The prognostic values of LBM in all-cause mortality risk based on LBM-M-H, LBM-H, LBM-CK, and LBM-A were similar. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Lean body mass estimated by the new equations based on MAMC and HGS was correlated with LBM obtained by DEXA and may serve as practical surrogate markers of LBM in PDpatients.
Authors: Denis Fouque; Marianne Vennegoor; Piet ter Wee; Christoph Wanner; Ali Basci; Bernard Canaud; Patrick Haage; Klaus Konner; Jeroen Kooman; Alejandro Martin-Malo; Lucianu Pedrini; Francesco Pizzarelli; James Tattersall; Jan Tordoir; Raymond Vanholder Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Soo Jeong Choi; Na Ri Kim; Seong Ah Hong; Wan Bok Lee; Moo Yong Park; Jin Kuk Kim; Seung Duk Hwang; Hae Kyung Lee Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Constantijn J A M Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Marc Schonck; Bernardus van Kreel; Guido A K Heidendal; Emile C Cheriex; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M L Leunissen Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.756