| Literature DB >> 26293807 |
Shamsul Mohd Zain1,2, Zahurin Mohamed1,2, Munir Pirmohamed3, Hwa Li Tan1,2, Mohammed Abdullah Alshawsh2, Sanjiv Mahadeva4, Wah-Kheong Chan4, Nik Raihan Nik Mustapha5, Rosmawati Mohamed4.
Abstract
A recent genome-wide copy number (CNV) scan identified a 13q12.11 duplication in the exportin-4 (XPO4) gene to be associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We sought to confirm the finding in a larger cohort and to assess the serum XPO4 pattern in a broad spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases. We analysed 249 NAFLD patients and 232 matched controls using TaqMan assay and serum XPO4 was measured. Copy number distribution was as follows: copy number neutral (NAFLD: 53.8%, controls: 68.6%), copy number losses (NAFLD: 13.3%, controls: 12.9%), copy number gains (NAFLD: 32.9%, controls: 18.5%). CNV gain was significantly associated with a greater risk of NAFLD (adjusted OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.42-3.46, P = 0.0004) and NASH (adjusted OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.47-3.68, P = 0.0003). Interestingly, subjects carrying extra copy number showed significantly higher serum ALT and triglyceride (P < 0.05). Serum XPO4 levels progressively declined (P = 0.043) from controls (24.6 ng/mL) to simple steatosis (20.8 ng/mL) to NASH (13.8 ng/mL). In conclusion, XPO4 CNV duplication was associated with histological severity of NAFLD, and accompanied by changes in serum XPO4 levels providing insights into NAFLD pathogenesis, and has the potential for biomarker development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26293807 PMCID: PMC4543956 DOI: 10.1038/srep13306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical data of the subjects.
| Characteristics | p-value | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | NAFLD ( | |||
| Gender | 0.043 | — | ||
| Males | 96 (41) | 126 (51) | — | — |
| Females | 136 (59) | 123 (49) | — | — |
| Ethnicity | 0.073 | — | ||
| Malay | 79 (34) | 110 (44) | — | — |
| Chinese | 97 (42) | 86 (35) | — | — |
| Indian | 56 (24) | 53 (21) | — | — |
| Age (years) | 49.6 ± 13.1 | 50.6 ± 11.6 | 0.307 | 0.102 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.6 ± 1.7 | 29.2 ± 4.5 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 49.3 ± 11.9 | 46.9 ± 11.5 | 0.30 | 0.014 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 83.2 ± 17.2 | 116.9 ± 41.0 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 174.0 ± 34.0 | 195.0 ± 44.0 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 105.6 ± 36.5 | 154.8 ± 68.7 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| AST (IU/L) | 20.3 ± 5.1 | 46.7 ± 27.1 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 24.4 ± 6.2 | 83.0 ± 48.2 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 36.5 ± 17.3 | 106.4 ± 103.0 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Serum XPO4 (ng/mL) | 24.6 ± 18.5 | 16.3 ± 14.8 | 0.038 | 0.048 |
aNumber of subjects (n) was not equal to overall subjects.
*P-values obtained using Mann-Whitney U test except for gender and ethnicity used χ2 test.
**P-values obtained using ANCOVA with age, gender and ethnicity as covariates.
Demographic and clinical data of the NAFLD patients.
| Characteristics | n (%) or Mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple steatosis (n = 32) | NASH (n = 217) | p-value | |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.461 | ||
| Males | 18 (56) | 108 (50) | |
| Females | 14 (44) | 109 (50) | |
| Age (years) | 50.4 ± 10.4 | 50.7 ± 11.8 | 0.906 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.4 ± 4.4 | 29.5 ± 4.4 | 0.012 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.1 ± 1.5 | 6.6 ± 1.5 | 0.010 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 92.6 ± 11.4 | 96.5 ± 10.8 | 0.047 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 47.0 ± 14.6 | 46.8 ± 11.0 | 0.942 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 113.4 ± 43.1 | 117.4 ± 40.7 | 0.594 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 196.3 ± 40.7 | 194.8 ± 44.6 | 0.854 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 155.6 ± 86.2 | 153.5 ± 66.0 | 0.802 |
| AST (IU/L) | 33.4 ± 17.0 | 48.7 ± 27.8 | 0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 60.7 ± 39.8 | 86.4 ± 48.6 | 0.001 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 101.1 ± 128.3 | 107.2 ± 99.0 | 0.019 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 132.7 ± 13.6 | 137.6 ± 18.7 | 0.144 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 84.9 ± 11.5 | 85.7 ± 11.8 | 0.756 |
| Serum XPO4 (ng/mL) | 20.8 ± 19.9 | 13.8 ± 10.2 | 0.141 |
*Number of subjects (n) was not equal to overall subjects.
aP-values obtained using independent t-test, all other comparisons used Mann-Whitney U test.
Association tests of CNV gain with different NAFLD stages.
| NAFLD spectrum | CNV gain frequency | Unadjusted | Adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | OR (CI) | p-value | OR (CI) | ||
| NAFLD vs. control | 0.33 vs. 0.19 | 0.0002 | 2.26 (1.47-3.50) | 0.0002 | 2.32 (1.49-3.61) |
| Simple steatosis vs. control | 0.28 vs. 0.19 | 0.244 | 1.66 (0.71-3.92) | 0.240 | 1.69 (0.70-4.08) |
| All NASH vs. control | 0.34 vs. 0.19 | 0.0002 | 2.37 (1.51-3.70) | 0.0001 | 2.43 (1.54-3.83) |
| NASH | 0.31 vs. 0.19 | 0.013 | 1.96 (1.15-3.33) | 0.029 | 1.87 (1.08-3.21) |
| NASH | 0.37 vs. 0.19 | 0.0001 | 2.93 (1.70-5.04) | <0.0001 | 3.21 (1.90-5.72) |
| NASH | 0.34 vs. 0.19 | 0.0003 | 2.41 (1.50-3.88) | 0.0016 | 2.22 (1.35-3.63) |
| NASH | 0.34 vs. 0.19 | 0.022 | 2.25 (1.13-4.48) | 0.012 | 2.55 (1.27-5.21) |
| All NASH vs. simple steatosis | 0.34 vs. 0.28 | 0.410 | 1.42 (0.61-3.30) | 0.590 | 1.27 (0.53-3.04) |
| NASH | 0.31 vs. 0.28 | 0.717 | 1.18 (0.49-2.86) | 0.984 | 0.98 (0.38-2.51) |
| NASH | 0.37 vs. 0.28 | 0.216 | 1.76 (0.72-4.30) | 0.288 | 1.68 (0.66-4.20) |
| NASH | 0.34 vs. 0.28 | 0.397 | 1.45 (0.62-3.41) | 0.650 | 1.25 (0.54-2.96) |
| NASH | 0.34 vs. 0.28 | 0.554 | 1.35 (0.50-3.64) | 0.901 | 1.06 (0.36-3.21) |
| NASH | 0.37 vs 0.31 | 0.184 | 1.49 (0.83-2.70) | ||
| NASH | 0.34 vs 0.34 | 0.842 | 0.93 (0.47-1.86) | ||
*P-values additionally adjusted for BMI, waist circumference and HbA1c.
NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis without significant fibrosis
NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis
NASH early non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
NASH advanced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Figure 1Association analysis between CNV gain and NAFLD.
Estimations of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in each study are displayed as closed squares and horizontal lines, respectively. The size of the black squares reflects the weight of the study in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the combined OR, calculated using a fixed effect model, with its 95% CI. NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Comparison of various clinical and histological parameters between the CNV status among NAFLD patients.
| Characteristics | CNV status, n = 249 (Mean ± SD) | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Losses (n = 33) | Neutral (n = 134) | Gains (n = 82) | p-value | ||
| Age (years) | 50.2 ± 11.3 | 51.1 ± 11.7 | 50.2 ± 12.0 | 0.835 | 0.961 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.3 ± 4.4 | 29.0 ± 4.8 | 29.8 ± 3.7 | 0.235 | 0.249 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 6.5 ± 1.5 | 6.5 ± 1.7 | 0.875 | 0.947 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 93.5 ± 10.2 | 96.2 ± 12.1 | 96.3 ± 9.1 | 0.404 | 0.393 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 49.4 ± 9.2 | 46.2 ± 11.6 | 47.3 ± 10.9 | 0.316 | 0.345 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 113.6 ± 36.9 | 115.3 ± 38.0 | 119.2 ± 44.1 | 0.697 | 0.692 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 185.4 ± 49.6 | 193.4 ± 41.9 | 200.1 ± 45.7 | 0.250 | 0.238 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 136.0 ± 58.2 | 154.1 ± 69.6 | 160.9 ± 66.8 | 0.046 | 0.190 |
| AST (IU/L) | 40.3 ± 25.7 | 46.2 ± 26.4 | 50.8 ± 27.7 | 0.063 | 0.167 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 72.1 ± 43.4 | 82.3 ± 52.0 | 90.3 ± 44.6 | 0.038 | 0.179 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 88.1 ± 110.4 | 102.3 ± 102.3 | 125.9 ± 106.2 | 0.007 | 0.206 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 134.3 ± 18.8 | 137.8 ± 19.1 | 136.4 ± 16.7 | 0.732 | 0.574 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 85.3 ± 10.2 | 85.7 ± 10.9 | 85.5 ± 13.9 | 0.844 | 0.946 |
| Steatosis grade | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 0.105 | 0.115 |
| Lobular inflammation | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 0.922 | 0.932 |
| Ballooning | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 0.490 | 0.439 |
| Fibrosis | 1.7 ± 1.0 | 1.3 ± 1.1 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 0.127 | 0.107 |
| Serum XPO4 (ng/mL) | 23.0 ± 16.1 | 20.4 ± 18.0 | 18.0 ± 16.3 | 0.304 | 0.663 |
*P-values
**P-values obtained using ANCOVA with age, gender and ethnicity as covariates.
aobtained using ANOVA, while Kruskal-Wallis test used for the other comparisons.