Literature DB >> 26291169

Evaluation of Improvement in Nasal Obstruction Following Nasal Valve Correction in Patients With a History of Failed Septoplasty.

Kyle J Chambers1, Kate A Horstkotte1, Kerry Shanley1, Robin W Lindsay1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with a septal deviation and concerns about nasal obstruction often undergo septoplasty to improve nasal airflow. Following primary septoplasty, however, some patients have persistent symptoms due to nasal valve dysfunction and may require nasal valve surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the change in disease-specific quality of life for patients who undergo nasal valve correction after failed septoplasty using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) survey and to determine whether identifiable anatomical risk factors are more common in patients with a history of failed septoplasty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational outcomes study conducted at a tertiary care medical center. Forty patients who underwent nasal valve correction through an open approach from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014, with a history of septoplasty for nasal obstruction were included. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2013, through May 1, 2015. [corrected].
INTERVENTIONS: Demographic information, a standardized nasal examination, and preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores were collected and reviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Comparison between preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores at 2, 4, and more than 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study; 23 (57%) were male and 17 (43%) were female. The mean age was 39.3 years. Findings from preoperative nasal examination demonstrated moderate or severe internal nasal valve narrowing in 38 (95%) patients, internal nasal valve collapse in 19 (48%), external nasal valve narrowing in 18 (45%), or external nasal valve collapse in 16 (40%). The most common anatomical cause of obstruction was internal nasal valve narrowing in 38 (95%) patients, dorsal septum deflection in 26 (65%), and narrowed middle vault in 16 (40%). The mean (SD) preoperative NOSE score was 75.7 (20.1). Mean (SD) postoperative NOSE scores at 2, 4, and greater than 6 months were 31.4 (27.2), 34.0 (19.8), and 22.1 (18.8), respectively, with significantly improved NOSE scores at each time point compared with before surgery (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Nasal valve dysfunction remains an underdiagnosed entity and should be considered in all patients with septal deviation before septoplasty, especially in patients with a severe dorsal deflection and a narrow middle vault. In this study, surgical nasal valve correction demonstrated a significant reduction in nasal obstruction, as measured by a validated outcome measure, in patients for whom a previous septoplasty had failed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26291169     DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  12 in total

1.  Validation of a septoplasty deformity grading system for the evaluation of nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Gu; Sherrie Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; Hollin Calloway; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Health Utility Values as an Outcome Measure in Patients Undergoing Functional Septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Shekhar K Gadkaree; Jennifer C Fuller; Natalie S Justicz; Rachel E Weitzman; Adeeb Derakhshan; Suresh Mohan; Robin W Lindsay
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Assessment of Pliability and Elasticity of the External Nasal Skin in Patients With Unilateral Nasal Valve Collapse: A Static Biomechanical Evaluation.

Authors:  James P Bonaparte; Ross Campbell
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Use of Spreader Flaps Without Dorsal Hump Reduction and the Effect on Nasal Function.

Authors:  Justin C Sowder; Andrew J Thomas; Cristian D Gonzalez; Nikhil S Limaye; Preston Daniel Ward
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  The Discrepancy Between Subjective and Objective Findings After Septoplasty.

Authors:  Sekib Umihanic; Fuad Brkic; Munevera Osmic; Sefika Umihanic; Suad Imamovic; Samir Kamenjakovic; Samir Hodzic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Reliability and construct validity of the Ottawa valve collapse scale when assessing external nasal valve collapse.

Authors:  Hedyeh Ziai; James P Bonaparte
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-14

7.  Pre-surgery planning tool for estimation of resection volume to improve nasal breathing based on lattice Boltzmann fluid flow simulations.

Authors:  M Berger; M Pillei; A Giotakis; A Mehrle; W Recheis; F Kral; M Kraxner; H Riechelmann; W Freysinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Repair of the Lateral Nasal Wall in Nasal Airway Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cherian K Kandathil; Emily A Spataro; Katri Laimi; Sami P Moubayed; Sam P Most; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  A prospective cohort study assessing the clinical utility of the Cottle maneuver in nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  James P Bonaparte; Ross Campbell
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-11

10.  A prospective, non-randomized evaluation of a novel low energy radiofrequency treatment for nasal obstruction and snoring.

Authors:  Detlef Brehmer; Robert Bodlaj; Friedemann Gerhards
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.