Literature DB >> 26290738

GAPDH, β-actin and β2-microglobulin, as three common reference genes, are not reliable for gene expression studies in equine adipose- and marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Fatemeh Nazari1, Abbas Parham2, Adham Fani Maleki1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative real time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) is one of the most important techniques for gene-expression analysis in molecular based studies. Selecting a proper internal control gene for normalizing data is a crucial step in gene expression analysis via this method. The expression levels of reference genes should be remained constant among cells in different tissues. However, it seems that the location of cells in different tissues might influence their expression. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has any effect on expression level of three common reference genes (GAPDH, β-actin and β2-microglobulin) in equine marrow- and adipose- derived undifferentiated MSCs and consequently their reliability for comparative qRT-PCR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) samples were harvested from 3 mares. MSCs were isolated and cultured until passage 3 (P3). Total RNA of P3 cells was extracted for cDNA synthesis. The generated cDNAs were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The PCR reactions were ended with a melting curve analysis to verify the specificity of amplicon.
RESULTS: The expression levels of GAPDH were significantly different between AT- and BM- derived MSCs (p < 0.05). Differences in expression level of β-actin (P < 0.001) and B2M (P < 0.006.) between MSCs derived from AT and BM were substantially higher than GAPDH. In addition, the fold change in expression levels of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in AT-derived MSCs compared to BM-derived MSCs were 2.38, 6.76 and 7.76, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that GAPDH and especially β-actin and B2M express in different levels in equine AT- and BM- derived MSCs. Thus they cannot be considered as reliable reference genes for comparative quantitative gene expression analysis in MSCs derived from equine bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B2M; Equine; GAPDH; Mesenchymal stem cells; Reference gene; β-actin

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290738      PMCID: PMC4540241          DOI: 10.1186/s40781-015-0050-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol        ISSN: 2055-0391


Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are one of the best candidates for cell therapy and regenerative medicine because of their self-renewal, multilineage differentiation, immunomodulatory capabilities and limited tendency to tumorogenesis [1,2]. Many studies have been reported the application of MSCs for treatment of equine musculoskeletal disorders [3,4]. Equine MSCs could be isolated from different sources, including bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord [5,6]. Among the sources of equine MSCs that have been isolated so far, bone marrow and adipose tissue are the main sources in clinical trials for treating equine orthopedic disorders [7]. Although MSCs- derived from various sources have similarities, some differences have been reported in biological, proliferative, immunological and differentiative characteristics [8]. MSCs are different in gene expression profile [9,10] and microarray analyses of stemness markers in equine MSCs have shown differences in molecular phenotypes [11]. These differences lead to different functional potentials based on anatomical location [12]. Different characteristics of MSCs can be detectable at transcriptional or translational levels. As a limited specific monolclonal antibodies are available for phenotyping of equine MSCs using immunostaining and flowcytometry techniques, comparative gene expression analysis on mRNA level using quantitative real time- polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has a great value [13,14]. qRT-PCR is a popular mean to evaluate mRNA expression level and a sensitive and accurate technique for amplification of mRNA [15]. In this method, amplicon accumulation is measured by intercalating dyes such as SYBR Green I [16,17]. However, it is essential to control for errors between samples when measuring RNA expression. Therefore, coincident measurement of a reference gene- also called housekeeping gene- should be used for the normalization of target gene expression data. There are some various reference genes which are involved in different processes in the cells [18]. In the relative quantitative RT-PCR method, an appropriate reference gene should be considered for accurate quantification of RNA expression because the cycle thresholds (CT) of the target genes are compared to the reference gene(s) [19]. The expression levels of reference genes should be remained constant between the cells isolated from different tissues [20], otherwise the normalization to varying internal references can result to increased errors [16]. Several genes have been used as housekeeping genes, including β2-microglobulin (B2M), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-actin (ACTB), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) and ribosomal RNA (18 s and 28 s rRNA) [18,21]. From these genes, β-actin, GAPDH and B2M are used most frequent as reference genes in comparative gene analysis in researches on equine marrow- and adipose- derived MSCs [22-24]. GAPDH catalyzes the oxidative phosphorylation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate during glycolysis as well as the reverse reaction in gluconeogenesis. β-actin is one of the cytoskeletal actins that are involved in cell motility, structure and integrity [18,25]. B2M is a structural protein and a component of MHC-I molecule. B2M has positive or negative effect on cell proliferation depending on cell type [26,27]. It seems that cell source and experimental treatment can affect the expression level of housekeeping genes [28]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the stability of housekeeping genes expression between MSCs- derived from different sources. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has any effect on expression level of three common reference genes (GAPDH, β-actin and B2M) in equine marrow- and adipose- derived undifferentiated MSCs and consequently their reliability for comparative qRT-PCR.

Methods

Cell isolation, culture and expansion

The experimental protocols were approved by the Committee of Ethics and Animal Welfare of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Iran. Bone marrow (BM) and adipose tissue (AT) samples were collected from three healthy mares aged 3, 6 and 10 years old. BM samples were aspirated using a Jamshidi needle with 1000 IU of sodium heparin/ml. Mononuclear cells were isolated by gradient centrifugation on Histopaque®-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 400 g. The cells were rinsed twice with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS−, Gibco) and plated at 8 × 105 cells/cm2 in 25 cm2 flasks in growth medium consisting of high glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), and 1% Streptomycin/Penicillin and 0.1% amphotericin. Samples of adipose tissue were collected from gluteal region. The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was immediately isolated by digestion with 0.1% of collagenase (Type I, Sigma–Aldrich) supplemented with 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), in an incubator at 37°C for 2 hours. The final solution was centrifuged at 600 g for 5 minutes and the cell-containing pellet was resuspended. The cells were washed twice with DPBS− and seeded at 8 × 104 cells/cm2 in 25 cm2 flasks in growth medium similar to bone marrow- derived cells. Cells were incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 until reaching approximately 80% confluence. The cells were then treated with Tryple enzyme (Invitrogen) and passaged until 3rd passage (P3). P3 cells (3 × 106) were transported to microtubes and stored at −80°C for total RNA extraction.

Cell characterization

To characterize isolated cells at P3, they were examined for triliniage differentiation capacity (osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic) using defined media. In addition, expression of specific cell surface markers including CD29, CD90, CD34 and MHC-II were investigated.

RNA extraction, quality analysis and cDNA synthesis

Frozen cells (stored at −80°C) were used for RNA extraction. Total RNA of each sample (containing 2 million cells) was extracted with high pure column RNA extraction kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Roche, Germany). The RNA concentration and quality was determined by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop Technologies) and gel electrophoresis, respectively. Total extracted RNA was used for cDNA synthesis. Total RNA was treated with RNAse–free DNAse I during extraction phases. 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Accupower kit (South Korea).

Real-time quantitative PCR

Primer sets of GAPDH and B2M were designed on different exons (intron-spanning) and of β-actin on one exon were designed using Primer Premier V.5 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA), according to the parameters required for the SYBR Green Real-Time PCR [29]. Primer characterization, accession numbers for equine mRNA sequences and length of amplicon are shown in Table 1. The generated cDNAs were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. 25 μl reactions were carried out in triplicate in a qRT-PCR cycler (QIAGEN Rotor-Gene 6000 Real-Time Thermal Cycler) using SYBR Green Master Mix (thermo scientific, USA). cDNA samples were diluted 2 times and 2 microlitre of cDNA were used in each reaction along with 200 nM of forward and reverse primers. The cycling conditions were one initial cycle of 94°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing temperature (56.5°C) for 45 s and 72°C for 60 s. The program was ended with a dissociation curve analysis to verify the product and identify the presence of spurious PCR bands or primer dimers. In each experiment, negative control and RT minus sample were used to check template contamination and genomic DNA contamination. Moreover, PCR products were run on 1% agarose gel to confirm specificity of amplification. CT was automatically determined by the Optical System Software (Rotor-Gene Q series software) and these data were exported for further analyses.
Table 1

Information of evaluated internal control genes and their primer sequences

Reference gene Accession number function Forward primer Reverse primer Amplicon size (bp)
Glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)NM_001163856Oxidoreductase in glycolysis and gluconeogenesisTGTCATCAACGGAAAGGCGCATCAGCAGAAGGAGCA183
β-actinNM_001081838Cytoskeletal structural proteinGGGCATCCTGACCCTCAAGTCCATGTCGTCCCAGTTGGT63
Β2-microglobulin (B2M)NM_001082502A component of MHC class I moleculeCGAAGGTTCAGGTTTACTCACGATTTCAATCTCAGGCGGA97
Information of evaluated internal control genes and their primer sequences

Data analysis

CT values of 3 samples in each group (with 3 replicates) were analyzed with t-test using SPSS.16 software. To calculate the average fold change in GAPDH, β-actin and B2M expression in AT- MSCs compared to BM- derived MSCS, the mean CT values was calculated as 2-CT. Then, average fold change was obtained by division of mean of AT- MSCs value to the mean of BM- derived MSCs value [30].

Results

Isolated cells from both sources were characterized as MSCs

Minimal criteria for identification of isolated mesenchymal stem cells were evaluated [14,31,32]. Isolated cells were plastic adherent with a fibroblast-like phenotype. They showed the pattern of mesenchymal markers expression (CD29, CD44, and CD90) and the lack of expression of MHC-II and CD34 (as hematopoietic marker). In addition, cellular differentiation assays demonstrated the chondrogenic, adipogenic and osteogenic potential of the isolated cells.

RNA integrity and purity

All RNA samples had absorbance values at 260 and 280 nm (A260/280) and 260 and 230 nm (A260/230) 2.0–2.2 and 1.8–2.2, respectively. Gel electrophoresis of RNA samples showed two clear bands related to rRNA (28 s and 18 s) along with 5 s band which confirmed the quality of RNA. There was no evidence of contaminating genomic DNA in all runs. Moreover, GAPDH primers amplified fragments 418 bp and 183 bp from DNA whereas amplified only 183 bp fragment from cDNA. No 418 amplicon was observed in gel electrophoresis of PCR products. Likewise, primers were validated by amplification efficiencies (E = 10-1/slope) of 100% ± 10% and the efficiency of reactions was 1.90, 2 and 2.03 for GAPDH, β-actin and B2M respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Standard curve for GAPDH, ACTB and B2M genes.

Standard curve for GAPDH, ACTB and B2M genes.

Expression levels of GAPDH mRNA in equine marrow- and adipose- derived MSCs

Fluorescence was measured during each PCR cycle and the amount of fluorescence was proportional to the amount of the PCR product. Actually, CT value is inversely proportional to the total RNA concentration isolated from MSCs, hence CT values for BM-MSCs were greater than AT-MSCs ones. The melting curve analysis showed the specificity of the GAPDH primers (Figure 2). Subsequently, the agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to confirm the size and purity of amplification products in various samples (Figure 3). The mean ± SD of CT values for GAPDH expression in AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs is shown in Table 2. Statistical analysis showed that the expression levels of GAPDH were significantly different between AT- and BM- derived MSCs (p < 0.05). The expression level of GAPDH in AT-derived MSCs compared to BM-derived MSCs was 2.38 times (Figure 4).
Figure 2

Derivative melting-curve analysis using SYBR Green to identify the dissociation temperature of reference gene amplicons and the specificity of RT-PCR reactions using total RNA from equine marrow- and adipose derived MSCs. The Optical System Software plotted the rate of change of the relative fluorescence units with time (dF)/dT) on the Y-axis versus the temperature (°C) on the X-axis, which peaks at the melting temperature (Tm). Similar peaks indicate no contamination and primer–dimer artifact. BM = Bone marrow; AT = Adipose tissue; MSCs = Mesenchymal stem cells.

Figure 3

Representative ethidium bromide-stained gel electrophoresis confirmed the size of all the PCR products generated was at 183 bp for GAPDH, 63 bp for β-actin and 97 bp for B2M. First (1) lane is 100-bp DNA marker, 6 next lanes are bone marrow (1–3) and adipose tissue (4–6) samples and the last lane (7) is negative control.

Table 2

Threshold cycles (C ) of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in equine bone marrow- and adipose tissue- derived MSCs

Gene Case N. Replicates BM-MSCs AT-MSCs
C T mean SD C T mean SD
GAPDH3319.11a 2.5216.19b 0.49
ACTB3321.97a 2.2118.05b 0.70
B2M3322.35a 3.1417.66b 1.09

Letters (a, b) represent significant differences in expression levels of GAPDH (P < 0.05), β-actin (P < 0.001) and B2M (P < 0.006) between BM- and AT-derived MSCs. BM = Bone marrow; AT = Adipose tissue; MSCs = Mesenchymal stem cells.

Figure 4

The fold change of GAPDH, ACTB and B2M expression in adipose (AT)- derived MSCs compared with bone marrow (BM)- derived MSCs. It was 2.38, 6.76 and 7.76 for GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in AT- MSCs compared with BM- MSCs, respectively. The mean CT values are calculated as 2-CT, then fold change is obtained.

Derivative melting-curve analysis using SYBR Green to identify the dissociation temperature of reference gene amplicons and the specificity of RT-PCR reactions using total RNA from equine marrow- and adipose derived MSCs. The Optical System Software plotted the rate of change of the relative fluorescence units with time (dF)/dT) on the Y-axis versus the temperature (°C) on the X-axis, which peaks at the melting temperature (Tm). Similar peaks indicate no contamination and primer–dimer artifact. BM = Bone marrow; AT = Adipose tissue; MSCs = Mesenchymal stem cells. Representative ethidium bromide-stained gel electrophoresis confirmed the size of all the PCR products generated was at 183 bp for GAPDH, 63 bp for β-actin and 97 bp for B2M. First (1) lane is 100-bp DNA marker, 6 next lanes are bone marrow (1–3) and adipose tissue (4–6) samples and the last lane (7) is negative control. Threshold cycles (C ) of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in equine bone marrow- and adipose tissue- derived MSCs Letters (a, b) represent significant differences in expression levels of GAPDH (P < 0.05), β-actin (P < 0.001) and B2M (P < 0.006) between BM- and AT-derived MSCs. BM = Bone marrow; AT = Adipose tissue; MSCs = Mesenchymal stem cells. The fold change of GAPDH, ACTB and B2M expression in adipose (AT)- derived MSCs compared with bone marrow (BM)- derived MSCs. It was 2.38, 6.76 and 7.76 for GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in AT- MSCs compared with BM- MSCs, respectively. The mean CT values are calculated as 2-CT, then fold change is obtained.

Expression levels of β-actin mRNA in equine marrow- and adipose- derived MSCs

Similar to GAPDH, fluorescence was measured during each PCR cycle for amplifying ACTB amplicon. Again, each run was completed with a melting curve analysis to confirm the specificity of amplification and lack of primer dimmers (Figure 2). Further analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed the melt curve analysis (Figure 3). The mean ± SD of CT values for expression of β-actin in AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs is shown in Table 2. Statistical analysis showed that differences in expression levels of β-actin in AT- and BM- derived MSCs were significant (p < 0.001). Actually, the expression level of β-actin in AT-derived MSCs compared to BM-derived MSCs was 6.76 times (Figure 4).

Expression levels of B2M mRNA in equine marrow- and adipose- derived MSCs

cDNA was amplified by qPCR using B2M primers with a melting curve at the end of amplification (Figure 2). Mean ± SD of quantification Cycle (CT) values was determined (Table 2). Statistical analysis indicated significant difference between averages of CT values of two groups (p < 0.006). A single peak in melting curve and lack of nonspecific bands in gel electrophoresis of qPCR products demonstrated that one product was amplified (Figure 3). The expression level of B2M in AT-derived MSCs compared to BM-derived MSCs was 7.76 times (Figure 4).

Discussion

BM-derived MSCs are widely investigated but because of high proliferation and less invasive access of AT-derived MSCs, this source is more attractive [33,34]. It is suggested that the location of MSCs in various tissues results in some differences in their characteristics [6,9,10]. Comparative gene expression analysis is one of the suitable methods to clarify their differences [22]. Absolute and relative methods are two ways for quantification of gene transcripts. To study changes in gene expression levels in terms of quantity, the relative method is used, which present the data of target gene relative to internal control gene (s) [30,35]. GAPDH, β–actin and B2M are frequently used as endogenous controls for quantitative RT-PCR analysis because their expression seems to be consistent at different time points and various experimental manipulations [20,25,36,37]. In contrast, our finding showed that the expression levels of GAPDH and especially β–actin and B2M were significantly different between AT- and BM- derived MSCs. Moreover, the expression levels of both genes in AT-MSCs were much more than BM-MSCs. So, it seems that the location of MSCs cells could affect the expression levels of these genes. Recently several scientific reports which are working on different research fields about equine and especially equine MSCs have used common housekeeping genes as reference [5,23,24,38,39]. Many studies have tried to introduce a reasonable method to find a reliable reference gene. The stability of reference gene expression is the definition of endogenous control and it is essential to finding the stable one(s) to every experimental condition or tissue location in the body [24,40,41]. Some studies in the field of equine MSCs have used GAPDH, β-actin and B2M as internal control genes without presenting any data regarding the stability of these genes [5,22,23], whereas some studies have confirmed the instability of their expression which is in agreement with our findings [42,43]. Transcription rate of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M can be influenced by a number of factors such as cellular proliferation. The β-actin functions in cellular shape and anchorage [44]. GAPDH, in addition to its role in glycolytic processes, has been involved in membrane transport, microtubule assembly, protein phosphotransferase/kinase reactions, the translational control of gene expression and DNA replication [45]. B2M stimulate cell proliferation in stromal cells so that its over expression and knockdown affect proliferation of MSCs [46]. So, cellular proliferation can induce upregulation of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M gene expression [47]. In agreement with Burk et al. [10], we previously found that the proliferative capacity of AT-MSCs is more than BM-MSCs [31,32] which can explain the greater expression levels of GAPDH, β-actin and B2M in AT-MSCs compared to BM-MSCs.

Conclusion

Although many studies in the field of equine MSCs commonly have used GAPDH, β–actin and B2M as simple internal genes, it seems that their expression levels in MSCs isolated from different tissues is not stable and they could not be considered as suitable reference genes for comparative gene analysis studies. Thus, it is necessary to find and introduce proper reference genes for comparative gene expression analysis studies in equine MSCs isolated from bone marrow and adipose tissue.
  45 in total

1.  Isolation and implantation of autologous equine mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow into the superficial digital flexor tendon as a potential novel treatment.

Authors:  R K W Smith; M Korda; G W Blunn; A E Goodship
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue.

Authors:  Susanne Kern; Hermann Eichler; Johannes Stoeve; Harald Klüter; Karen Bieback
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Tania Nolan; Rebecca E Hands; Stephen A Bustin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Characterization and osteogenic potential of equine muscle tissue- and periosteal tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Catherine L Radtke; Rodolfo Nino-Fong; Blanca P Esparza Gonzalez; Henrik Stryhn; Laurie A McDuffee
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 5.  Markers of stemness in equine mesenchymal stem cells: a plea for uniformity.

Authors:  Catharina De Schauwer; Evelyne Meyer; Gerlinde R Van de Walle; Ann Van Soom
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  New insights into an old protein: the functional diversity of mammalian glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  M A Sirover
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-07-13

7.  Clonal analysis of the proliferation potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as a function of potency.

Authors:  Katie C Russell; Michelle R Lacey; Jennifer K Gilliam; H Alan Tucker; Donald G Phinney; Kim C O'Connor
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and skin exhibit differences in molecular phenotype and differentiation potential.

Authors:  May Al-Nbaheen; Radhakrishnan Vishnubalaji; Dalia Ali; Amel Bouslimi; Fawzi Al-Jassir; Matthias Megges; Alessandro Prigione; James Adjaye; Moustapha Kassem; Abdullah Aldahmash
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.

Authors:  Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 10.  β2-Microglobulin-mediated signaling as a target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Takeo Nomura; Wen-Chin Huang; Haiyen E Zhau; Sajni Josson; Hiromitsu Mimata; Leland W K Chung
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.505

View more
  11 in total

1.  RPS13, a potential universal reference gene for normalisation of gene expression in multiple human normal and cancer tissue samples.

Authors:  Mudasir Rashid; Sanket Girish Shah; Abhiram Natu; Tripti Verma; Sukanya Rauniyar; Poonam B Gera; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  NR4A1 inhibits the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatic stellate cells: Involvement of TGF-β-Smad2/3/4-ZEB signaling.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Jingying Xu; Yanyan Ge; Yue Shi; Fei Wang; Mingli Zhu
Journal:  Open Life Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.311

3.  Effects of recipient age, heparin release and allogeneic bone marrow-derived stromal cells on vascular graft remodeling.

Authors:  Richard Johnson; Michael Rafuse; Prakash Parthiban Selvakumar; Wei Tan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Characterization of adipose tissue macrophages and adipose-derived stem cells in critical wounds.

Authors:  Norbert Pallua; Richard Bucala; Bong-Sung Kim; Pathricia V Tilstam; Katrin Springenberg-Jung; Arne Hendrick Boecker; Corinna Schmitz; Daniel Heinrichs; Soo Seok Hwang; Jan Philipp Stromps; Bergita Ganse; Ruedger Kopp; Matthias Knobe; Juergen Bernhagen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Salivary Scavenger and Agglutinin (SALSA) Is Expressed in Mucosal Epithelial Cells and Decreased in Bronchial Epithelium of Asthmatic Horses.

Authors:  Gary Kwok Cheong Lee; Laurence Tessier; Dorothee Bienzle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-29

6.  GAPDH and PUM1: Optimal Housekeeping Genes for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Analysis of Cancer Stem Cells and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Gene Expression in Rectal Tumors.

Authors:  Litika Vermani; Rajeev Kumar; Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-10

7.  Ppia is the most stable housekeeping gene for qRT-PCR normalization in kidneys of three Pkd1-deficient mouse models.

Authors:  Juan J Muñoz; Ana C Anauate; Luiz F Onuchic; Ita P Heilberg; Andressa G Amaral; Frederico M Ferreira; Elieser H Watanabe; Renata Meca; Milene S Ormanji; Mirian A Boim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Normalization in Three Types of Rat Adipose Tissue.

Authors:  Wan-Xia Zhang; Jie Fan; Jing Ma; Yi-Song Rao; Li Zhang; You-E Yan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Identification of Optimal Reference Genes for Expression Analysis in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and Its Relatives Based on Expression Stability.

Authors:  Mengmeng Duan; Jinglei Wang; Xiaohui Zhang; Haohui Yang; Haiping Wang; Yang Qiu; Jiangping Song; Yangdong Guo; Xixiang Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Using RNA-Seq to Identify Reference Genes of the Transition from Brown to White Adipose Tissue in Goats.

Authors:  Linjie Wang; Xingyue Chen; Tianzeng Song; Xujia Zhang; Siyuan Zhan; Jiaxue Cao; Tao Zhong; Jiazhong Guo; Li Li; Hongping Zhang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.