Bita Shareghi1, Per-Erik Johanson1, Johan Kärrholm1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborgsvägen 31, SE-431 80 Mölndal, Sweden. E-mail address for B. Shareghi: bita.shareghi@vgregion.se. E-mail address for P.-E. Johanson: per-erik.johanson@vgregion.se. E-mail address for J. Kärrholm: johan.karrholm@vgregion.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene infused with vitamin E (E-poly) was developed to increase oxidative resistance without affecting mechanical properties. We evaluated this type of polyethylene in a randomized clinical study that used radiostereometric analysis. Our objective was to compare the early-term femoral head penetration of an E-poly liner with that of a heat-treated polyethylene liner, ArComXL. We hypothesized that the clinical outcome at two years following total hip arthroplasty would be unaffected by the choice of polyethylene. METHODS: In this prospective study, sixty-one patients (seventy hips) with noninflammatory hip osteoarthritis and a median age of fifty-eight years were randomized to receive either an implant with an E-Poly or a heat-treated highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. The patients were followed for two years and evaluated at three time points (three months, one year, and two years). RESULTS: The median proximal penetration in the E-poly group increased from 0.04 mm at three months to 0.06 mm at two years of follow-up. Corresponding values for the ArComXL group were 0.03 mm and 0.10 mm. In both groups, significantly increased penetration was observed between three months and two years (E-poly, p = 0.02; ArComXL, p < 0.001), but between one and two years, the increase was significant only in the control group (E-poly, p = 0.23; ArComXL, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The femoral head penetration of E-poly was very low at two years. Whether the increase observed between three months and two years was caused by creep, deformation, wear, or a combination of these cannot be determined by our study. There were no significant differences observed in femoral head penetration rates between E-poly and ArComXL. Currently, the theoretical advantages of E-poly remain to be confirmed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene infused with vitamin E (E-poly) was developed to increase oxidative resistance without affecting mechanical properties. We evaluated this type of polyethylene in a randomized clinical study that used radiostereometric analysis. Our objective was to compare the early-term femoral head penetration of an E-poly liner with that of a heat-treated polyethylene liner, ArComXL. We hypothesized that the clinical outcome at two years following total hip arthroplasty would be unaffected by the choice of polyethylene. METHODS: In this prospective study, sixty-one patients (seventy hips) with noninflammatory hip osteoarthritis and a median age of fifty-eight years were randomized to receive either an implant with an E-Poly or a heat-treated highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. The patients were followed for two years and evaluated at three time points (three months, one year, and two years). RESULTS: The median proximal penetration in the E-poly group increased from 0.04 mm at three months to 0.06 mm at two years of follow-up. Corresponding values for the ArComXL group were 0.03 mm and 0.10 mm. In both groups, significantly increased penetration was observed between three months and two years (E-poly, p = 0.02; ArComXL, p < 0.001), but between one and two years, the increase was significant only in the control group (E-poly, p = 0.23; ArComXL, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The femoral head penetration of E-poly was very low at two years. Whether the increase observed between three months and two years was caused by creep, deformation, wear, or a combination of these cannot be determined by our study. There were no significant differences observed in femoral head penetration rates between E-poly and ArComXL. Currently, the theoretical advantages of E-poly remain to be confirmed.
Authors: Caroline Scemama; Philippe Anract; Valérie Dumaine; Antoine Babinet; Jean Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Joost H J van Erp; Julie R A Massier; Jelle J Halma; Thom E Snijders; Arthur de Gast Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 3.717