RATIONALE: We implemented an electronic early warning and response system (EWRS) to improve detection of and response to severe sepsis. Sustainability of such a system requires stakeholder acceptance. We hypothesized that clinicians receiving such alerts perceive them to be useful and effective. OBJECTIVES: To survey clinicians after EWRS notification about perceptions of the system. METHODS: For a 6-week study period 1 month after EWRS implementation in a large tertiary referral medical center, bedside clinicians, including providers (physicians, advanced practice providers) and registered nurses (RNs), were surveyed confidentially within 2 hours of an alert. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the 247 alerts that triggered, 127 providers (51%) and 105 RNs (43%) completed the survey. Clinicians perceived most patients as stable before and after the alert. Approximately half (39% providers, 48% RNs) felt the alert provided new information, and about half (44% providers, 56% RNs) reported changes in management as a result of the alert, including closer monitoring and additional interventions. Over half (54% providers, 65% RNs) felt the alert was appropriately timed. Approximately one-third found the alert helpful (33% providers, 40% RNs) and fewer felt it improved patient care (24% providers, 35% RNs). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of responders perceived the EWRS to be useful, likely related to the perception that most patients identified were stable. However, management was altered half the time after an alert. These results suggest further improvements to the system are needed to enhance clinician perception of the system's utility.
RATIONALE: We implemented an electronic early warning and response system (EWRS) to improve detection of and response to severe sepsis. Sustainability of such a system requires stakeholder acceptance. We hypothesized that clinicians receiving such alerts perceive them to be useful and effective. OBJECTIVES: To survey clinicians after EWRS notification about perceptions of the system. METHODS: For a 6-week study period 1 month after EWRS implementation in a large tertiary referral medical center, bedside clinicians, including providers (physicians, advanced practice providers) and registered nurses (RNs), were surveyed confidentially within 2 hours of an alert. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the 247 alerts that triggered, 127 providers (51%) and 105 RNs (43%) completed the survey. Clinicians perceived most patients as stable before and after the alert. Approximately half (39% providers, 48% RNs) felt the alert provided new information, and about half (44% providers, 56% RNs) reported changes in management as a result of the alert, including closer monitoring and additional interventions. Over half (54% providers, 65% RNs) felt the alert was appropriately timed. Approximately one-third found the alert helpful (33% providers, 40% RNs) and fewer felt it improved patient care (24% providers, 35% RNs). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of responders perceived the EWRS to be useful, likely related to the perception that most patients identified were stable. However, management was altered half the time after an alert. These results suggest further improvements to the system are needed to enhance clinician perception of the system's utility.
Entities:
Keywords:
early warning systems; electronic medical record; sepsis and shock; survey design
Authors: Jennifer C Ginestra; Heather M Giannini; William D Schweickert; Laurie Meadows; Michael J Lynch; Kimberly Pavan; Corey J Chivers; Michael Draugelis; Patrick J Donnelly; Barry D Fuchs; Craig A Umscheid Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marina Mutter; Melissa Martin; Yu Yamamoto; Aditya Biswas; Boian Etropolski; Harold Feldman; Amit Garg; Noah Gourlie; Stephen Latham; Haiqun Lin; Paul M Palevsky; Chirag Parikh; Erica Moreira; Ugochukwu Ugwuowo; Francis P Wilson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Khalia Ackermann; Jannah Baker; Malcolm Green; Mary Fullick; Hilal Varinli; Johanna Westbrook; Ling Li Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Sahil Sandhu; Anthony L Lin; Nathan Brajer; Jessica Sperling; William Ratliff; Armando D Bedoya; Suresh Balu; Cara O'Brien; Mark P Sendak Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 5.428