BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction is considered a core feature of schizophrenia, and impaired performances in episodic memory (EM) and executive function (EF) tasks are consistently reported in schizophrenia patients. Traditional fMRI and EEG studies have helped identifying brain areas, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), involved in these tasks. However, it is unclear whether intrinsic defects in prefrontal function per se contribute to poor performance in schizophrenia, given the presence of confounds like reduced motivation and psychotic symptoms. TMS/hd-EEG measurements are obtained without cognitive effort, and can be calculated in any cortical area. METHODS: We performed TMS/hd-EEG recordings in parietal, motor, premotor, and PFC in healthy individuals (N=20) and schizophrenia patients (N=20). Source modeling of TMS-evoked responses was performed, and measures of cortical activity (significant current density, SCD) and connectivity (significant current scattering, SCS) were computed. Patients with schizophrenia also performed Penn Word memory delayed (CPWd) and Penn Conditional Exclusion Test (PCET). CPWd evaluates EM and involves primarily PFC, whereas PCET reflects EF and implicates PFC with other brain regions. FINDINGS: We found no difference in SCD and SCS after TMS of parietal/motor cortices, whereas those parameters were reduced in premotor/prefrontal areas in schizophrenia patients. In PFC, where these measures were most defective, SCD was negatively correlated with performance in CPWd whereas higher SCS values were associated with more errors in PCET. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that schizophrenia patients have intrinsic defects in both activity and connectivity of PFC, and that these defects are specifically associated with impairments in cognitive abilities.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive dysfunction is considered a core feature of schizophrenia, and impaired performances in episodic memory (EM) and executive function (EF) tasks are consistently reported in schizophreniapatients. Traditional fMRI and EEG studies have helped identifying brain areas, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), involved in these tasks. However, it is unclear whether intrinsic defects in prefrontal function per se contribute to poor performance in schizophrenia, given the presence of confounds like reduced motivation and psychotic symptoms. TMS/hd-EEG measurements are obtained without cognitive effort, and can be calculated in any cortical area. METHODS: We performed TMS/hd-EEG recordings in parietal, motor, premotor, and PFC in healthy individuals (N=20) and schizophreniapatients (N=20). Source modeling of TMS-evoked responses was performed, and measures of cortical activity (significant current density, SCD) and connectivity (significant current scattering, SCS) were computed. Patients with schizophrenia also performed Penn Word memory delayed (CPWd) and Penn Conditional Exclusion Test (PCET). CPWd evaluates EM and involves primarily PFC, whereas PCET reflects EF and implicates PFC with other brain regions. FINDINGS: We found no difference in SCD and SCS after TMS of parietal/motor cortices, whereas those parameters were reduced in premotor/prefrontal areas in schizophreniapatients. In PFC, where these measures were most defective, SCD was negatively correlated with performance in CPWd whereas higher SCS values were associated with more errors in PCET. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that schizophreniapatients have intrinsic defects in both activity and connectivity of PFC, and that these defects are specifically associated with impairments in cognitive abilities.
Authors: R C Gur; J D Ragland; P J Moberg; T H Turner; W B Bilker; C Kohler; S J Siegel; R E Gur Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Anna Rotarska-Jagiela; Vincent van de Ven; Viola Oertel-Knöchel; Peter J Uhlhaas; Kai Vogeley; David E J Linden Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Fabio Ferrarelli; Marcello Massimini; Michael J Peterson; Brady A Riedner; Mariana Lazar; Michael J Murphy; Reto Huber; Mario Rosanova; Andrew L Alexander; Ned Kalin; Giulio Tononi Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel H Wolf; Ruben C Gur; Jeffrey N Valdez; James Loughead; Mark A Elliott; Raquel E Gur; J Daniel Ragland Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Przemysław Adamczyk; Miroslaw Wyczesany; Aleksandra Domagalik; Artur Daren; Kamil Cepuch; Piotr Błądziński; Andrzej Cechnicki; Tadeusz Marek Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Sarine S Janetsian-Fritz; Nicholas M Timme; Maureen M Timm; Aqilah M McCane; Anthony J Baucum Ii; Brian F O'Donnell; Christopher C Lapish Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 6.222