| Literature DB >> 26288372 |
Fabrice Tranchida1, Laetitia Shintu1, Zo Rakotoniaina1, Léopold Tchiakpe2, Valérie Deyris1, Abel Hiol3, Stefano Caldarelli4.
Abstract
We explored, using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics and fatty acids profiling, the effects of a common nutritional complement, Curcuma longa, at a nutritionally relevant dose with human use, administered in conjunction with an unbalanced diet. Indeed, traditional food supplements have been long used to counter metabolic impairments induced by unbalanced diets. Here, rats were fed either a standard diet, a high level of fructose and saturated fatty acid (HFS) diet, a diet common to western countries and that certainly contributes to the epidemic of insulin resistance (IR) syndrome, or a HFS diet with a Curcuma longa extract (1% of curcuminoids in the extract) for ten weeks. Orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) on the serum NMR profiles and fatty acid composition (determined by GC/MS) showed a clear discrimination between HFS groups and controls. This discrimination involved metabolites such as glucose, amino acids, pyruvate, creatine, phosphocholine/glycerophosphocholine, ketone bodies and glycoproteins as well as an increase of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and a decrease of n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Although the administration of Curcuma longa did not prevent the observed increase of glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol and insulin levels, discriminating metabolites were observed between groups fed HFS alone or with addition of a Curcuma longa extract, namely some MUFA and n-3 PUFA, glycoproteins, glutamine, and methanol, suggesting that curcuminoids may act respectively on the fatty acid metabolism, the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway and alcohol oxidation. Curcuma longa extract supplementation appears to be beneficial in these metabolic pathways in rats. This metabolomic approach highlights important serum metabolites that could help in understanding further the metabolic mechanisms leading to IR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26288372 PMCID: PMC4545834 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the diets and fatty acid profile.
| Constituents (g/100 g dry weight) | Control diet | HFS diet |
|---|---|---|
|
| 19 | 19 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
|
| 62 | − |
|
| 3 | − |
|
| 5 | − |
|
| − | 61.7 |
|
| 7 | 7 |
|
| 0.04 | 0.04 |
|
| − | 12 |
|
| 3.5 | − |
|
| ||
|
| 15.5 | 24.6 |
|
| traces | 13.8 |
|
| 2.3 | 2.2 |
|
| 25 | 37.9 |
|
| 48 | 10.8 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.8 |
|
| 17 | 40.6 |
|
| 30 | 46.9 |
|
| 53 | 12.5 |
∑ SFA = total saturated fatty acids, ∑ MUFA = total monounsaturated fatty acids, ∑ PUFA = total polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Results of serum biochemical analysis after 10 weeks of diet.
| Group | Controls | HFS | HFS+C |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 435.17 ± 20.74 | 438.42 ± 31.85 | 444.75 ± 50.78 |
|
| 0.0262 ± 0.0008 | 0.0310 ± 0.0010 | 0.0334 ± 0.0016 |
|
| 1 ± 0.33 | 10.79 ± 1.89 | 6.97 ± 2.05 |
|
| 1.07 ± 0.18 | 1.82 ± 0.41 | 1.80 ± 0.44 |
|
| 0.48 ± 0.13 | 3.34 ± 0.50 | 2.22 ± 0.69 |
|
| 0.435 ± 0.15 | 0.878 ± 0.22 | 1.114 ± 0.36 |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.06 |
Relative liver weight is defined as liver weight divided by body weight. Values are mean ± S.E.M (n = 6–12 rats/group).
*P < 0.05 vs. the control
**P < 0.01 vs. the control.
Measurements of lipid peroxidation, total antioxidant capacity of serum after 10 weeks of diet.
| Group | Controls | HFS | HFS+C |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.31 ± 0.10 | 0.80 ± 0.07 | 0.81 ± 0.048 |
|
| 2763.6 ± 108.9 | 2456.4 ± 84.3 | 2243.1 ± 103.8 |
a Malondialdehyde
b oxygen radical absorbance capacity.
Values are mean ± S.E.M (n = 6–12 rats/group).
*p < 0.05 vs. the control.
Fatty acid composition of serum.
| Fatty acid | Controls | HFS | HFS+C | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.09 |
|
| 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.82 ± 0.07 | 0.94 |
|
| 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.009 |
|
| 19.07 ± 0.91 | 19.98 ± 0.25 | 19.97 ± 0.54 | 0.49 |
|
| 1.80 ± 0.09 | 2.60 ± 0.26 | 2.33 ± 0.38 | 0.24 |
|
| 24.46 ± 0.87 | 21.71 ± 1.43 | 20.46 ± 1.91 | 0.34 |
|
| 7.73 ± 0.20 | 17.64 ± 0.92 | 21.48 ± 1.30 | 0.00000011 |
|
| 2.37 ± 0.11 | 3.14 ± 0.23 | 2.77 ± 0.31 | 0.12 |
|
| 17.00 ± 0.61 | 13.09 ± 0.68 | 13.26 ± 0.93 | 0.013 |
|
| 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.07 | 0.57 |
|
| 0.40 ± 0.11 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.011 |
|
| 0.56 ± 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.018 |
|
| 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.0002 |
|
| 18.69 ± 1.09 | 15.02 ± 1.08 | 14.38 ± 0.76 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.30 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.05 |
|
| 0.86 ± 0.20 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.86 ± 0.22 | 0.90 ± 0.10 | 0.80 ± 0.12 | 0.83 |
|
| 2.65 ± 0.29 | 1.77 ± 0.16 | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 0.00005 |
|
| 0.98 ± 0.27 | 1.11 ± 0.09 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.014 |
| ∑ | 46.30 ± 1.38 | 44.06 ± 1.50 | 42.58 ± 2.15 | 0.50 |
| ∑ | 13.57 ± 0.41 | 24.73 ± 0.98 | 27.79 ± 1.59 | 0.0005 |
| ∑ | 40.12 ± 1.37 | 31.21 ± 0.88 | 29.60 ± 1.21 | 0.0015 |
| ∑ | 3.35 ± 0.43 | 2.08 ± 0.15 | 1.29 ± 0.06 | 0.000038 |
| ∑ | 36.78 ± 1.4 | 29.13 ± 0.81 | 28.32 ± 1.22 | 0.0042 |
| Δ | 0.09 ± 0.003 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.314 |
| Δ | 0.32 ± 0.007 | 0.87 ± 0.09 | 1.23 ± 0.19 | 0.0005 |
| Δ | 0.01 ± 0.0005 | 0.04 ± 0.003 | 0.03 ± 0.003 | 0.0004 |
| Δ | 128.67 ± 13.5 | 36.35 ± 6.16 | 39.24 ± 5.09 | 0.0008 |
Relative fatty acid composition (% of total) and estimated desaturase activities in serum of rats fed control, HFS and HFS+C diets. Values are mean ± S.E.M (n = 6–12 rats/group). Samples were measured in duplicate. ∑ SFA total saturated fatty acids, ∑ PUFA total polyunsaturated fatty acids, ∑ MUFA total monounsaturated fatty acids, Δ estimated desaturase activity.
a significantly different from control group
b significantly different from HFS group; after multiple comparison tests and Bonferroni adjustment of the significance level.
Fig 11H CPMG NMR spectrum of serum sample from rats fed with the HFS+C diet.
Assignments: 1. lipids; 2. isoleucine; 3. leucine; 4. valine; 5. propylene glycol; 6. β-hydroxybutyrate; 7. lactate; 8. alanine; 9. lysine; 10. acetate; 11. glycoproteins (acetyl); 12. acetoacetate; 13. unknown; 14. glutamate; 15. pyruvate; 16. glutamine; 17. citrate; 18. creatine; 19. choline; 20. phosphocholine/glycerophosphocholine; 21. methanol; 22. alpha-glucose and beta-glucose; 23. cytidine; 24. tyrosine; 25. histidine; 26. phenylalanine; 27. formate.
Fig 2PCA score plot of the serum samples from Control, HFS and HFS+C groups.
Fig 3OPLS-DA score and loadings plots.
(A) OPLS-DA score plot representing the 54 samples in the Tpred 1 vs Tpred 2 plane. (B, C-D) OPLSDA loadings plot representing the weights of the relative fatty acid contents and the NMR signals, respectively, along the two predictive components derived from OPLS-DA model of serum samples obtained from controls, HFS and HFS+C groups. The line variation (C, D) corresponds to model covariance derived from the mean-centered model, whereas the color map corresponds to model correlation derived from the unit-variance model.
Significantly differential metabolites in the rat serum of control, HFS and HFS+C group.
| metabolites | Changes in HFS | Changes in HFS+C | Changes in HFS+C |
|---|---|---|---|
| (vs Controls) | (vs Controls) | (vs HFS) | |
|
| ↓ 1.43 | ↓ 1.29 | |
|
| ↓ 1.45 | ↓ 1.39 | |
|
| ↓ 1.53 | ↓ 1.82 | |
|
| ↑ 1.37 | ↑ 1.31 | |
|
| ↓ 1.13 | ||
|
| ↓ 1.12 | ↓ 1.13 | |
|
| ↓ 1.30 | ↓ 1.44 | |
|
| ↓ 1.36 | ↓ 1.25 | |
|
| ↓ 1.21 | ↓ 1.17 | |
|
| ↓ 1.17 | ↓ 1.13 | |
|
| ↑ 1.55 | ↑ 1.40 | |
|
| ↓ 1.85 | ↓ 1.43 | |
|
| ↓ 1.21 | ↓ 1.25 | |
|
| ↓ 1.23 | ↓ 1.14 | |
|
| ↓ 1.68 | ↓ 1.77 | |
|
| ↓ 1.38 | ↓ 1.33 | |
|
| ↑ 1.51 | ↑ 1.55 | |
|
| |||
|
| ↑ 2.54 | ↑ 2.20 | |
|
| ↑ 1.45 | ↑ 1.30 | |
|
| ↑ 2.28 | ↑ 2.78 | ↑ 1.22 |
|
| ↓ 1.30 | ↓ 1.28 | |
|
| ↓ 3.36 | ↓ 4.43 | |
|
| ↓ 4.64 | ↓ 3.33 | |
|
| ↑ 4.18 | ↑ 3.29 | |
|
| ↓ 1.24 | ↓ 1.30 | |
|
| ↓ 5.55 | ↓ 3.69 | |
|
| ↓ 3.90 | ↓ 7.55 | |
|
| ↓ 1.49 | ↓ 1.55 | ↓ 2.31 |
|
| ↓ 1.38 |
The serum metabolites that contributed significantly to the discrimination between the different diets in the OPLS-DA model from the 1H NMR data. ↑ (or ↓) denotes the relative increased (or decreased), followed by fold change in metabolite level (p < 0.05). The levels were calculated from relative intensities of 1H NMR spectra following spectral normalization.