Elizabeth Mansfield1, Mary Stergiou-Kita1,2,3, John David Cassidy4, Mark Bayley1,2, Steve Mantis5, Vicki Kristman1,3,6, Bonnie Kirsh1, Manuel Gomez1, Mark G Jeschke1,7,8, Oshin Vartanian1, Joel Moody9, Angela Colantonio1,2. 1. a University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada . 2. b Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network , Toronto , ON , Canada . 3. c Institute for Work & Health , Toronto , ON , Canada . 4. d University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark . 5. e Ontario Network of Injured Workers' Groups , Kaministiquia , ON , Canada . 6. f Lakehead University , Thunder Bay , ON , Canada . 7. g Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre , Toronto , ON , Canada . 8. h Sunnybrook Research Institute , Toronto , ON , Canada , and. 9. i Electrical Safety Authority , Mississauga , ON , Canada.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To explore how individuals with work-related mild traumatic brain injury (wrMTBI) experience return-to-work (RTW) processes when returning to the workplace where the injury occurred. DESIGN: RTW experiences were explored using in-depth interviews and an inductive analytic approach. Qualitative analysis guided by the research question moved through phases of line-by-line and thematic coding through which categories and the interaction between categories emerged. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve workers diagnosed with a wrMTBI reported on their RTW experiences following wrMTBIs that occurred 3-5 years prior to the time of the interview. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Participants perceived employer and workers' compensation factors as profoundly influencing their RTW experiences. Participants consistently reported that employers and workers' compensation representatives had an inadequate understanding of wrMTBI sequelae. Six of 12 participants were re-injured following their wrMTBI, with three of these injuries occurring at work. CONCLUSION: Employers, co-workers and workers' compensation representatives should be aware of wrMTBI sequelae so injured workers can receive appropriate supports and both stigmatization and re-injury can be mitigated. Greater attention to the structural and social elements of workplace and compensation environments could inform strategies to break down barriers to successful return-to-work following a wrMTBI.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To explore how individuals with work-related mild traumatic brain injury (wrMTBI) experience return-to-work (RTW) processes when returning to the workplace where the injury occurred. DESIGN: RTW experiences were explored using in-depth interviews and an inductive analytic approach. Qualitative analysis guided by the research question moved through phases of line-by-line and thematic coding through which categories and the interaction between categories emerged. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve workers diagnosed with a wrMTBI reported on their RTW experiences following wrMTBIs that occurred 3-5 years prior to the time of the interview. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS:Participants perceived employer and workers' compensation factors as profoundly influencing their RTW experiences. Participants consistently reported that employers and workers' compensation representatives had an inadequate understanding of wrMTBI sequelae. Six of 12 participants were re-injured following their wrMTBI, with three of these injuries occurring at work. CONCLUSION: Employers, co-workers and workers' compensation representatives should be aware of wrMTBI sequelae so injured workers can receive appropriate supports and both stigmatization and re-injury can be mitigated. Greater attention to the structural and social elements of workplace and compensation environments could inform strategies to break down barriers to successful return-to-work following a wrMTBI.
Authors: L A Gaudet; L Eliyahu; J Beach; M Mrazik; G Cummings; D C Voaklander; B H Rowe Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 1.611
Authors: Mary Stergiou-Kita; Cheryl Pritlove; D Linn Holness; Bonnie Kirsh; Dwayne van Eerd; Andrea Duncan; Jennifer Jones Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Douglas P Terry; Grant L Iverson; William Panenka; Angela Colantonio; Noah D Silverberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: I E van Beukering; S J C Smits; K M E Janssens; R I Bogaers; M C W Joosen; M Bakker; J van Weeghel; E P M Brouwers Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-09-06