Literature DB >> 26285243

Importance of Risk Factors for Febrile Neutropenia Among Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Regimens Not Classified as High-Risk in Guidelines for Myeloid Growth Factor Use.

Derek Weycker1, Xiaoyan Li1, Rich Barron1, Hongsheng Wu1, P K Morrow1, Hairong Xu1, Maureen Reiner1, Jacob Garcia1, Shivani K Mhatre1, Gary H Lyman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving a colony-stimulating factor (CSF) when the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) is high (>20%). For patients receiving chemotherapy regimens not documented as high-risk, the decision regarding CSF prophylaxis use can be challenging, because some patients may be at high risk based on a combination of the regimen and individual risk factors.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort design and US private health care claims data were used. Study subjects received chemotherapy regimens classified as "low" or "intermediate," or unclassified, in terms of FN risk, and were stratified by cancer and regimen. For each subject, the first chemotherapy course, and each cycle and FN episode within the course, were identified. FN incidence proportions were estimated by the presence and number of risk factors and chronic comorbidities.
RESULTS: Across the 17 tumor/regimen combinations considered (n=160,304 in total), 74% to 98% of patients had 1 or more risk factor for FN and 41% to 89% had 2 or more. Among patients with 1 or more risk factor, FN incidence ranged from 7.2% to 29.0% across regimens, and the relative risk of FN (vs those without risk factors) ranged from 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) to 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.0). FN incidence increased in a graded and monotonic fashion with the number of risk factors and comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective evaluation of patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy regimens not classified as high-risk for FN in US clinical practice, most patients had 1 or more FN risk factor and many had 2 or more. FN incidence was found to be elevated in these patients, especially those with multiple risk factors.
Copyright © 2015 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26285243     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  9 in total

1.  Use of prophylactic growth factors and antimicrobials in elderly patients with cancer: a review of the Medicare database.

Authors:  Romina Sosa; Shuling Li; Julia T Molony; Jiannong Liu; Scott Stryker; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen® (pegfilgrastim) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  Arash Jenabian; Ali Ehsanpour; Seyed Mohammad Reza Mortazavizadeh; Jahangir Raafat; Mohsen Razavi; Adnan Khosravi; Sharareh Seifi; Babak Salimi; Nassim Anjidani; Hamidreza Kafi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Validation of the FENCE Risk Groups for Prediction of Febrile Neutropenia With First-Cycle Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Razan Zatarah; Nour Faqeer; Tasnim Quraan; Aseel Mahmoud; Lujain Matalka; Lana Abu Khadija; Aya Kamal; Dalia Rimawi
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in "real-world" clinical practice. A propensity-matched analysis of 76,940 patients.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Shawn Li; Steve Deitelzweig; Allison Keshishian; Melissa Hamilton; Ruslan Horblyuk; Kiran Gupta; Xuemei Luo; Jack Mardekian; Keith Friend; Anagha Nadkarni; Xianying Pan; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Robin Doroff; Ahuva Hanau; Charles Bowers; Rajesh Belani; David Chandler; Alexander Lonshteyn; Mark Bensink; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Primary Prophylaxis With Biosimilar Filgrastim for Patients at Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Edward Li; Dylan J Mezzio; David Campbell; Kim Campbell; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  The Impact of Baseline Risk Factors on the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Authors:  Edward Li; Bridgette Kanz Schroader; David Campbell; Kim Campbell; Weijia Wang
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-22

8.  Apixaban 5 and 2.5 mg twice-daily versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: Comparative effectiveness and safety evaluated using a propensity-score-matched approach.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Li; Allison Keshishian; Melissa Hamilton; Ruslan Horblyuk; Kiran Gupta; Xuemei Luo; Jack Mardekian; Keith Friend; Anagha Nadkarni; Xianying Pan; Gregory Y H Lip; Steve Deitelzweig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biosimilar Versus Originator Pegfilgrastim for Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: A Phase III Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Noninferiority Study.

Authors:  Ruben D Kowalyszyn; Luis E Fein; Martin E Richardet; Mirta S Varela; Eduardo Ortiz; Cristian Micheri; Juan J Zarba; Susana Kahl; Ezequiel Klimovsky; Andrea A Federico; Jorge H Cassini; Gustavo Cortese; Nestor Lago
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.