| Literature DB >> 26284032 |
Matthew S Fullmer1, Shannon M Soucy1, Johann Peter Gogarten2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: black queen hypothesis; gene transfer; pan-genome; red queen hypothesis; social cheating
Year: 2015 PMID: 26284032 PMCID: PMC4523029 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Schematic depiction of a strong version of the black queen hypothesis (Morris et al., . Each cell in the left panel contains all the genes that produce the four depicted common goods. Cells on the right, due to selection to minimize genome size, each produce only one of the common goods, and rely on the presence of other cells to produce the other ones. We consider this a strong version of the black queen hypothesis because it no longer contains exclusive helper strains; rather all individuals in the population described in the right hand panel are simultaneously helpers and beneficiaries. In this example dark open ovals represent individual cells; red diamonds: hydrolases that digest an extracellular polymer (e.g., phosphatase, sialidase, glucanase); green squares: siderophores that allow cells to acquire iron; black ovals: building blocks of the extracellular matrix (ECM) or enzymes that produce and assemble these building blocks; yellow triangles: enzymes that destroy oxygen radicals (e.g., catalase—reaction given; or peroxidase—reaction: ROOR' + electron donor (2 e−) + 2H+ → ROH + R'OH).