| Literature DB >> 26284009 |
Leonidas A Zampetakis1, Konstantinos Kafetsios2, Manolis Lerakis1, Vassilis Moustakis1.
Abstract
Individuals may perceive themselves as independent and distinct from others or as interdependent and connected to others. Do these differences in self-construal influence entrepreneurial preferences and intentions to start a new business in university students? Few studies have examined the influence of cultural orientations on entrepreneurial intentions at the individual level of analysis. Two studies investigated the role of independent and interdependent self-construal within the theory of planned behavior (TPB). In the first study, results from structural equation modeling analyses found that chronic independent self-construal was related to attitudes toward entrepreneurship and moderated relationships between attitudes and entrepreneurial intentions. In the second study, participants primed with an independent self-construal had more favorable entrepreneurial attitudes, but not intentions than participants primed with an interdependent focus. This set of studies extends cognitive models of entrepreneurship by demonstrating the role of self-construal in the TPB model at individual level.Entities:
Keywords: Greek students; entrepreneurial intentions; independence; interdependence; planned behavior; self-construal
Year: 2015 PMID: 26284009 PMCID: PMC4518144 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Descriptive statistics and inter-correlations for the total sample (Study 1; .
| Gender | 1.62 | 0.48 | – | |||||||
| Age | 22.27 | 3.08 | –0.03 | – | ||||||
| ATT | 4.20 | 1.48 | –0.11 | 0.07 | – | |||||
| PBC | 3.11 | 1.30 | –0.12 | 0.10 | 0.47 | – | ||||
| SN | 3.71 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.26 | – | |||
| INT | 3.03 | 1.12 | –0.12 | 0.15 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.23 | – | ||
| Independent self-construal (IND) | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.04 | – | |
| Interdependent self-construal (INTER) | 0.00 | 0.89 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.34 | – |
Gender is coded: 1 = male, 2 = female;
p < 0.05 (two tailed);
p < 0.01 (two tailed).
Figure 1Structural Model (standardized results). Circles represent latent factors; boxes represent indicators. Casual effects are given by arrows connecting circles. Bold numbers over paths are structural weights. Disturbance effects and variance explained for the indicators are omitted for clarity.
Figure 2Relationship between attitudes toward entrepreneurship (ATT) and entrepreneurial intention (INT) for different levels of the moderator variable (independent self-construal). The mean, one standard deviation above the mean (+1 SD) and one standard deviation below the mean (−1 SD).
Figure 3Relationship between perceived behavioral control (PBC) and entrepreneurial intention (INT) for different levels of the moderator variable (independent self-construal). The mean, one standard deviation above the mean (+1 SD) and one standard deviation below the mean (−1 SD).