Literature DB >> 26283358

New approach for optimal electricity planning and dispatching with hourly time-scale air quality and health considerations.

Paul Y Kerl1, Wenxian Zhang2, Juan B Moreno-Cruz3, Athanasios Nenes4, Matthew J Realff5, Armistead G Russell6, Joel Sokol7, Valerie M Thomas8.   

Abstract

Integrating accurate air quality modeling with decision making is hampered by complex atmospheric physics and chemistry and its coupling with atmospheric transport. Existing approaches to model the physics and chemistry accurately lead to significant computational burdens in computing the response of atmospheric concentrations to changes in emissions profiles. By integrating a reduced form of a fully coupled atmospheric model within a unit commitment optimization model, we allow, for the first time to our knowledge, a fully dynamical approach toward electricity planning that accurately and rapidly minimizes both cost and health impacts. The reduced-form model captures the response of spatially resolved air pollutant concentrations to changes in electricity-generating plant emissions on an hourly basis with accuracy comparable to a comprehensive air quality model. The integrated model allows for the inclusion of human health impacts into cost-based decisions for power plant operation. We use the new capability in a case study of the state of Georgia over the years of 2004-2011, and show that a shift in utilization among existing power plants during selected hourly periods could have provided a health cost savings of $175.9 million dollars for an additional electricity generation cost of $83.6 million in 2007 US dollars (USD2007). The case study illustrates how air pollutant health impacts can be cost-effectively minimized by intelligently modulating power plant operations over multihour periods, without implementing additional emissions control technologies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air pollution; electricity generation; energy policy; externalities; health impacts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26283358      PMCID: PMC4568275          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413143112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models.

Authors:  Amir Hakami; M Talat Odman; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Source apportionment of daily fine particulate matter at Jefferson Street, Atlanta, GA, during summer and winter.

Authors:  Mei Zheng; Glen R Cass; Lin Ke; Fu Wang; James J Schauer; Eric S Edgerton; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation.

Authors:  Kyle Siler-Evans; Inês Lima Azevedo; M Granger Morgan; Jay Apt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Daniel S Cohan; Amir Hakami; Yongtao Hu; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Understanding the industrial contribution to pollution offers opportunities to further improve air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Juan Moreno-Cruz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states.

Authors:  Juan Declet-Barreto; Andrew A Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A Metamodeling Framework for Quantifying Health Damages of Power Grid Expansion Plans.

Authors:  Mark D Rodgers; David W Coit; Frank A Felder; Annmarie G Carlton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A new approach for health-oriented ozone control strategy: Adjoint-based optimization of NOx emission reductions using metaheuristic algorithms.

Authors:  Mengya Wang; Tao Huang; David C Wong; Kin Fai Ho; Guanghui Dong; Steve H L Yim
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 11.072

5.  Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel B Howard; Jesse Thé; Rafael Soria; Neal Fann; Roberto Schaeffer; Jean-Daniel M Saphores
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 9.621

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.