Gabriel C Brooks1, Eric Vittinghoff1, Sivaraman Iyer1, Damini Tandon1, Peter Kuhar1, Kristine A Madsen1, Gregory M Marcus1, Mark J Pletcher1, Jeffrey E Olgin2. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (G.C.B., S.I., D.T., G.M.M., J.E.O.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.V., M.J.P.), University of California San Francisco; Azumio Inc, San Francisco, CA (P.K.); and School of Public Health, Division of Community Heath and Human Development, University of California Berkeley, (K.A.M.). 2. From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (G.C.B., S.I., D.T., G.M.M., J.E.O.), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.V., M.J.P.), University of California San Francisco; Azumio Inc, San Francisco, CA (P.K.); and School of Public Health, Division of Community Heath and Human Development, University of California Berkeley, (K.A.M.). Jeffrey.Olgin@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) independently predicts congestive heart failure severity, death, and heart failure hospitalizations, but must be administered in clinic by qualified staff on a premeasured course. As part of the Health eHeart Study, we sought to develop and validate a self-administered 6MWT mobile application (SA-6MWTapp) for independent use at home by patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a validation study of an SA-6MWTapp in 103 participants. In phase 1 (n=52), we developed a distance-estimation algorithm for the SA-6MWTapp by comparing step counts from an Actigraph and measured distance on a premeasured 6MWT course with step counts and estimated distance obtained simultaneously from our SA-6MWTapp (best estimation algorithm, r=0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.78-0.99]). In phase 2, 32 participants (including those with congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension) used the SA-6MWTapp independently in clinic, and the distance estimated by the SA-6MWTapp was compared with the measured distance (r=0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.79-0.92]). In phase 3, 19 patients with congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension consecutively enrolled from clinic performed 3.2±1 SA-6MWTapp tests per week at home over 2 weeks. Distances estimated from the SA-6MWTapp during home 6MWTs were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation =4.6%) and correlated with in-clinic-measured distance (r=0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.87-0.89]). Usability surveys performed during the second (in-clinic) and third (at-home) phases demonstrated that the SA-6MWTapp was simple and easy to use independently. CONCLUSIONS: An SA-6MWTapp is easy to use and yields accurate repeatable measurements in the clinic and at home.
BACKGROUND: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) independently predicts congestive heart failure severity, death, and heart failure hospitalizations, but must be administered in clinic by qualified staff on a premeasured course. As part of the Health eHeart Study, we sought to develop and validate a self-administered 6MWT mobile application (SA-6MWTapp) for independent use at home by patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a validation study of an SA-6MWTapp in 103 participants. In phase 1 (n=52), we developed a distance-estimation algorithm for the SA-6MWTapp by comparing step counts from an Actigraph and measured distance on a premeasured 6MWT course with step counts and estimated distance obtained simultaneously from our SA-6MWTapp (best estimation algorithm, r=0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.78-0.99]). In phase 2, 32 participants (including those with congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension) used the SA-6MWTapp independently in clinic, and the distance estimated by the SA-6MWTapp was compared with the measured distance (r=0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.79-0.92]). In phase 3, 19 patients with congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension consecutively enrolled from clinic performed 3.2±1 SA-6MWTapp tests per week at home over 2 weeks. Distances estimated from the SA-6MWTapp during home 6MWTs were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation =4.6%) and correlated with in-clinic-measured distance (r=0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.87-0.89]). Usability surveys performed during the second (in-clinic) and third (at-home) phases demonstrated that the SA-6MWTapp was simple and easy to use independently. CONCLUSIONS: An SA-6MWTapp is easy to use and yields accurate repeatable measurements in the clinic and at home.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lee Ingle; Rhidian J Shelton; Alan S Rigby; Samantha Nabb; Andrew L Clark; John G F Cleland Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Paul L Enright; Mary Ann McBurnie; Vera Bittner; Russell P Tracy; Robert McNamara; Alice Arnold; Anne B Newman Journal: Chest Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Robert S McKelvie; Faiez Zannad; Ileana L Piña Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel E Forman; Jerome L Fleg; Dalane W Kitzman; Clinton A Brawner; Ann M Swank; Robert S McKelvie; Robert M Clare; Stephen J Ellis; Mark E Dunlap; Vera Bittner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Omer T Inan; Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Abdul Q Javaid; Sean Dowling; Mozziyar Etemadi; Alexis Dorier; J Alex Heller; A Ozan Bicen; Shuvo Roy; Teresa De Marco; Liviu Klein Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Sangeetha Madhavan; Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Mark G Bowden; Neale R Chumbler; Edelle C Field-Fote; Trisha M Kesar Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 2.119