Literature DB >> 26282168

High-Resolution Rapid Diagnostic Imaging of Whole Prostate Biopsies Using Video-Rate Fluorescence Structured Illumination Microscopy.

Mei Wang1, Hillary Z Kimbrell2, Andrew B Sholl2, David B Tulman3, Katherine N Elfer1, Tyler C Schlichenmeyer1, Benjamin R Lee4, Michelle Lacey5, J Quincy Brown6.   

Abstract

Rapid assessment of prostate core biopsy pathology at the point-of-procedure could provide benefit in a variety of clinical situations. Even with advanced transrectal ultrasound guidance and saturation biopsy protocols, prostate cancer can be missed in up to half of all initial biopsy procedures. In addition, collection of tumor specimens for downstream histologic, molecular, and genetic analysis is hindered by low tumor yield due to inability to identify prostate cancer grossly. However, current point-of-procedure pathology protocols, such as frozen section analysis (FSA), are destructive and too time- and labor-intensive to be practical or economical. Ex vivo microscopy of the excised specimens, stained with fast-acting fluorescent histology dyes, could be an attractive nondestructive alternative to FSA. In this work, we report the first demonstration of video-rate structured illumination microscopy (VR-SIM) for rapid high-resolution diagnostic imaging of prostate biopsies in realistic point-of-procedure timeframes. Large mosaic images of prostate biopsies stained with acridine orange are rendered in seconds and contain excellent contrast and detail, exhibiting close correlation with corresponding hematoxylin and eosin histology. A clinically relevant review of VR-SIM images of 34 unfixed and uncut prostate core biopsies by two independent pathologists resulted in an area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) of 0.82-0.88, with a sensitivity ranging from 63% to 88% and a specificity ranging from 78% to 89%. When biopsies contained more than 5% tumor content, the sensitivity improved to 75% to 92%. The image quality, speed, minimal complexity, and ease of use of VR-SIM could prove to be features in favor of adoption as an alternative to destructive pathology at the point-of-procedure. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282168      PMCID: PMC4592466          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  20 in total

1.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy in Mohs skin excisions: feasibility of rapid surgical pathology.

Authors:  Daniel S Gareau; Yongbiao Li; Billy Huang; Zach Eastman; Kishwer S Nehal; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Processing stereotactic breast biopsy specimens: impact of specimen radiography system on workflow.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Marisa Borders; Kimberly Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Feasibility of digitally stained multimodal confocal mosaics to simulate histopathology.

Authors:  Daniel S Gareau
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy of human skin ex vivo: spectral analysis for digital staining to simulate histology-like appearance.

Authors:  Jason Bini; James Spain; Kishwer Nehal; Vikki Hazelwood; Charles DiMarzio; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Video-rate structured illumination microscopy for high-throughput imaging of large tissue areas.

Authors:  Tyler C Schlichenmeyer; Mei Wang; Katherine N Elfer; J Quincy Brown
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Management of rising prostate-specific antigen after a negative biopsy.

Authors:  David A Levy; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  From tissue to molecular phenotyping: pre-analytical requirements heidelberg experience.

Authors:  Thomas R Muley; Felix Jf Herth; Philipp A Schnabel; Hendrik Dienemann; Michael Meister
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06

8.  Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Campos-Fernandes; Laurence Bastien; Nathalie Nicolaiew; Grégoire Robert; Stéphane Terry; Francis Vacherot; Laurent Salomon; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; René Yiou; Jean Jacques Patard; Claude Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Feasibility of confocal fluorescence microscopy for real-time evaluation of neoplasia in fresh human breast tissue.

Authors:  Jessica L Dobbs; Hao Ding; Ana Paula Benveniste; Henry M Kuerer; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wei Yang; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Optimization of a widefield structured illumination microscope for non-destructive assessment and quantification of nuclear features in tumor margins of a primary mouse model of sarcoma.

Authors:  Henry L Fu; Jenna L Mueller; Melodi P Javid; Jeffrey K Mito; David G Kirsch; Nimmi Ramanujam; J Quincy Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Raman-Encoded Molecular Imaging with Topically Applied SERS Nanoparticles for Intraoperative Guidance of Lumpectomy.

Authors:  Yu Winston Wang; Nicholas P Reder; Soyoung Kang; Adam K Glaser; Qian Yang; Matthew A Wall; Sara H Javid; Suzanne M Dintzis; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Rapid pathology of lumpectomy margins with open-top light-sheet (OTLS) microscopy.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Weisi Xie; Adam K Glaser; Nicholas P Reder; Chenyi Mao; Suzanne M Dintzis; Joshua C Vaughan; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Direct comparison between confocal and multiphoton microscopy for rapid histopathological evaluation of unfixed human breast tissue.

Authors:  Tadayuki Yoshitake; Michael G Giacomelli; Lucas C Cahill; Daniel B Schmolze; Hilde Vardeh; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Partial nephrectomy margin imaging using structured illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Mei Wang; David B Tulman; Andrew B Sholl; Sree H Mandava; Michael M Maddox; Benjamin R Lee; J Quincy Brown
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Nondestructive Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer on 18-gauge Core Needle Renal Biopsy Using Dual-color Fluorescence Structured Illumination Microscopy.

Authors:  James Liu; Mei Wang; David Tulman; Sree H Mandava; Katherine N Elfer; Andrew Gabrielson; Weil Lai; Caleb Abshire; Andrew B Sholl; J Quincy Brown; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Comparing histologic evaluation of prostate tissue using nonlinear microscopy and paraffin H&E: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lucas C Cahill; James G Fujimoto; Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Yubo Wu; Douglas I Lin; Huihui Ye; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Andrew A Wagner; Seymour Rosen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Deep learning 2D and 3D optical sectioning microscopy using cross-modality Pix2Pix cGAN image translation.

Authors:  Huimin Zhuge; Brian Summa; Jihun Hamm; J Quincy Brown
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: prostatic and periprostatic tissues atlas and evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Laura Bertoni; Stefano Puliatti; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Antonino Maiorana; Ahmed Eissa; Paola Azzoni; Luigi Bevilacqua; Valentina Spandri; Shaniko Kaleci; Ahmed Zoeir; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Salvatore Micali; Giampaolo Bianchi; Giovanni Pellacani; Bernardo Rocco; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Ex Vivo Microscopy: A Promising Next-Generation Digital Microscopy Tool for Surgical Pathology Practice.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Jonathan Quincy Brown; Nicusor Iftimia; Richard M Levenson; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Feasibility study for ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) on diagnostic prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Ulf Titze; Torsten Hansen; Barbara Titze; Birte Schulz; Alfons Gunnemann; Bernardo Rocco; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.