Felipe Damas1, Stuart M Phillips2, Manoel E Lixandrão3, Felipe C Vechin3, Cleiton A Libardi4, Hamilton Roschel3, Valmor Tricoli3, Carlos Ugrinowitsch3. 1. School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65, São Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil. felipedamas@usp.br. 2. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. 3. School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65, São Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil. 4. Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luiz, Km 235-SP310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It has been proposed that skeletal muscle shows signs of resistance training (RT)-induced muscle hypertrophy much earlier (i.e., ~3-4 weeks of RT) than previously thought. We determined if early increases in whole muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) during a period of RT were concomitant with edematous muscle swelling and thus not completely attributable to hypertrophy. METHODS: We analyzed vastus lateralis muscle ultrasound CSA images and their respective echo intensities (CSA-USecho) at the beginning (T1), in the 3rd week of RT (T2) and at the end (T3) of a 10-week RT period in ten untrained young men. Functional parameters [training volume (TV = load × reps × sets) and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] and muscle damage markers (myoglobin and interleukin-6) were also assessed. RESULT: Muscle CSA increased significantly at T2 (~2.7%) and T3 (~10.4%) versus T1. Similarly, CSA-USecho increased at T2 (~17.2%) and T3 (~13.7%). However, when CSA-USecho was normalized to the increase in muscle CSA, only T2 showed a significantly higher USecho versus T1. Additionally, TV increased at T2 and T3 versus T1, but MVC increased only at T3. Myoglobin and Interleukin-6 were elevated at T2 versus T1, and myoglobin was also higher at T2 versus T3. CONCLUSION: We propose that early RT-induced increases in muscle CSA in untrained young individuals are not purely hypertrophy, since there is concomitant edema-induced muscle swelling, probably due to muscle damage, which may account for a large proportion of the increase. Therefore, muscle CSA increases (particularly early in an RT program) should not be labeled as hypertrophy without some concomitant measure of muscle edema/damage.
PURPOSE: It has been proposed that skeletal muscle shows signs of resistance training (RT)-induced muscle hypertrophy much earlier (i.e., ~3-4 weeks of RT) than previously thought. We determined if early increases in whole muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) during a period of RT were concomitant with edematous muscle swelling and thus not completely attributable to hypertrophy. METHODS: We analyzed vastus lateralis muscle ultrasound CSA images and their respective echo intensities (CSA-USecho) at the beginning (T1), in the 3rd week of RT (T2) and at the end (T3) of a 10-week RT period in ten untrained young men. Functional parameters [training volume (TV = load × reps × sets) and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] and muscle damage markers (myoglobin and interleukin-6) were also assessed. RESULT: Muscle CSA increased significantly at T2 (~2.7%) and T3 (~10.4%) versus T1. Similarly, CSA-USecho increased at T2 (~17.2%) and T3 (~13.7%). However, when CSA-USecho was normalized to the increase in muscle CSA, only T2 showed a significantly higher USecho versus T1. Additionally, TV increased at T2 and T3 versus T1, but MVC increased only at T3. Myoglobin and Interleukin-6 were elevated at T2 versus T1, and myoglobin was also higher at T2 versus T3. CONCLUSION: We propose that early RT-induced increases in muscle CSA in untrained young individuals are not purely hypertrophy, since there is concomitant edema-induced muscle swelling, probably due to muscle damage, which may account for a large proportion of the increase. Therefore, muscle CSA increases (particularly early in an RT program) should not be labeled as hypertrophy without some concomitant measure of muscle edema/damage.
Authors: Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-04-19
Authors: Jason M DeFreitas; Travis W Beck; Matt S Stock; Michael A Dillon; Paul R Kasishke Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jason E Tang; Jennifer G Perco; Daniel R Moore; Sarah B Wilkinson; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Felipe Damas; Stuart M Phillips; Manoel E Lixandrão; Felipe C Vechin; Cleiton A Libardi; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Carlos Ugrinowitsch Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Mark S Miller; Damien M Callahan; Timothy W Tourville; James R Slauterbeck; Anna Kaplan; Brad R Fiske; Patrick D Savage; Philip A Ades; Bruce D Beynnon; Michael J Toth Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-01-12
Authors: Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Matt S Stock; Jacob A Mota; Ryan N DeFranco; Katherine A Grue; A Unique Jacobo; Eunhee Chung; Jordan R Moon; Jason M DeFreitas; Travis W Beck Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.078