Literature DB >> 26280638

Development and validation of an ultrasound scoring system for children with suspected acute appendicitis.

Sara C Fallon1, Robert C Orth2, R Paul Guillerman3, Martha M Munden3, Wei Zhang4, Simone C Elder1, Andrea T Cruz5, Mary L Brandt1, Monica E Lopez1, George S Bisset3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To facilitate consistent, reliable communication among providers, we developed a scoring system (Appy-Score) for reporting limited right lower quadrant ultrasound (US) exams performed for suspected pediatric appendicitis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation of this scoring system and its ability to risk-stratify children with suspected appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA compliant, Institutional Review Board-approved study, the Appy-Score was applied retrospectively to all limited abdominal US exams ordered for suspected pediatric appendicitis through our emergency department during a 5-month pre-implementation period (Jan 1, 2013, to May 31, 2013), and Appy-Score use was tracked prospectively post-implementation (July 1, 2013, to Sept. 30,2013). Appy-Score strata were: 1 = normal completely visualized appendix; 2 = normal partially visualized appendix; 3 = non-visualized appendix, 4 = equivocal, 5a = non-perforated appendicitis and 5b = perforated appendicitis. Appy-Score use, frequency of appendicitis by Appy-Score stratum, and diagnostic performance measures of US exams were computed using operative and clinical finding as reference standards. Secondary outcome measures included rates of CT imaging following US exams and negative appendectomy rates.
RESULTS: We identified 1,235 patients in the pre-implementation and 686 patients in the post-implementation groups. Appy-Score use increased from 24% (37/155) in July to 89% (226/254) in September (P < 0.001). Appendicitis frequency by Appy-Score stratum post-implementation was: 1 = 0.5%, 2 = 0%, 3 = 9.5%, 4 = 44%, 5a = 92.3%, and 5b = 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 96.3% (287/298), 93.9% (880/937), 83.4% (287/344), and 98.8% (880/891) pre-implementation and 93.0% (200/215), 92.6% (436/471), 85.1% (200/235), and 96.7% (436/451) post-implementation - only NPV was statistically different (P = 0.012). CT imaging after US decreased by 31% between pre- and post-implementation, 8.6% (106/1235) vs. 6.0% (41/686); P = 0.048). Negative appendectomy rates did not change (4.4% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.8).
CONCLUSION: A scoring system and structured template for reporting US exam results for suspected pediatric appendicitis was successfully adopted by a pediatric radiology department at a large tertiary children's hospital and stratifies risk for children based on their likelihood of appendicitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; Appendix; Children; Structured reporting; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280638     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3443-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  23 in total

1.  Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Manoj K Mittal; Peter S Dayan; Charles G Macias; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan Bennett; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Kelly Sinclair; Michelle D Stevenson; Anupam B Kharbanda
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Outcomes of children with suspected appendicitis and incompletely visualized appendix on ultrasound.

Authors:  Marshall J Ross; Helena Liu; Stuart J Netherton; Robin Eccles; Ping-Wei Chen; Graham Boag; Ellen Morrison; Graham C Thompson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Acute appendicitis: investigating an optimal outer appendiceal diameter cut-point in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Patrick M Prendergast; Naveen Poonai; Tim Lynch; Scott McKillop; Rodrick Lim
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Does appendiceal diameter change with age? A sonographic study.

Authors:  Sarah M Coyne; Bin Zhang; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Improvement in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix through the use of equivocal interpretive categories.

Authors:  David B Larson; Andrew T Trout; Shelby R Fierke; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Appendix not seen: the predictive value of secondary inflammatory sonographic signs.

Authors:  Andrea Estey; Naveen Poonai; Rodrick Lim
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.454

7.  Acute appendicitis in young children: cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in diagnosis--a Markov decision analytic model.

Authors:  Michael J Wan; Murray Krahn; Wendy J Ungar; Edona Caku; Lillian Sung; L Santiago Medina; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol.

Authors:  Abhay Srinivasan; Sabah Servaes; Andrès Peña; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  Prospective evaluation of a clinical pathway for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Ashley Saucier; Eunice Y Huang; Chetachi A Emeremni; Jay Pershad
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Prospective comparison of MR imaging and US for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Robert C Orth; R Paul Guillerman; Wei Zhang; Prakash Masand; George S Bisset
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language.

Authors:  Lindsey A G Shea; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 2.  Abdominal ultrasonography of the pediatric gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Heather I Gale; Michael S Gee; Sjirk J Westra; Katherine Nimkin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  A novel Appendicitis TriMOdal prediction Score (ATMOS) for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Goran Augustin; Mislav Mikuš; Branko Bogdanic; Ognjen Barcot; Mislav Herman; Marina Šprem Goldštajn; Alessandro Tropea; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of cecal appendix diameter in pediatric population.

Authors:  Marcos Roberto Gomes de Queiroz; Miguel José Francisco Neto; Antonio Rahal Junior; Victor Arantes Jabour; Guilherme Neves Lourenço Andrade; Paulo Savoia Dias da Silva; Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia; Marcelo Dos Santos Pereira; Marina Ramos Santos; Pedro Andrade Alencar Luna; Yoshino Tamaki Sameshima; Fabiana Gual; Marcelo Guimarães Dutra; Beatriz Placca Germino; Isabella Ferreira Alves
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Ultrasonographic findings of child acute appendicitis incorporated into a scoring system.

Authors:  Gheorghe Nicusor Pop; Flaviu Octavian Costea; Diana Lungeanu; Emil Radu Iacob; Calin Marius Popoiu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Belinda De Simone; Marco Ceresoli; Goran Augustin; Alice Gori; Marja Boermeester; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Tarasconi; Nicola De' Angelis; Dieter G Weber; Matti Tolonen; Arianna Birindelli; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Michael Kelly; Kjetil Soreide; Jeffry Kashuk; Richard Ten Broek; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Michael Sugrue; Richard Justin Davies; Dimitrios Damaskos; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Raul Coimbra; Massimo Chiarugi; Gabriele Sganga; Adolfo Pisanu; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Edward Tan; Harry Van Goor; Francesco Pata; Isidoro Di Carlo; Osvaldo Chiara; Andrey Litvin; Fabio C Campanile; Boris Sakakushev; Gia Tomadze; Zaza Demetrashvili; Rifat Latifi; Fakri Abu-Zidan; Oreste Romeo; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gianluca Baiocchi; David Costa; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Thomas Scalea; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Searching for certainty: findings predictive of appendicitis in equivocal ultrasound exams.

Authors:  Morgan E Telesmanich; Robert C Orth; Wei Zhang; Monica E Lopez; Jennifer L Carpenter; Nadia Mahmood; Siddharth P Jadhav; R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-06-09

8.  The non-visualized appendix and secondary signs on ultrasound for pediatric appendicitis in the community hospital setting.

Authors:  Jenny M Held; Christian S McEvoy; Jonathan D Auten; Stephen L Foster; Robert L Ricca
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology.

Authors:  Jörg C Hoffmann; Claus-Peter Trimborn; Michael Hoffmann; Ralf Schröder; Sarah Förster; Klaus Dirks; Andrea Tannapfel; Matthias Anthuber; Alois Hollerweger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Improving diagnostic accuracy in clinically ambiguous paediatric appendicitis: a retrospective review of ultrasound and pathology findings with focus on the non-visualised appendix.

Authors:  B S Kelly; S M Bollard; A Weir; C O'Brien; D Mullen; M Kerin; P McCarthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.