Patrick M Prendergast1, Naveen Poonai2, Tim Lynch2, Scott McKillop3, Rodrick Lim4. 1. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiology, Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: rod.lim@lhsc.on.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain in children requiring operative intervention. Among a number of sonographic criteria to aid in the diagnosis of appendicitis, an outer diameter >6 mm is the most objective and widely accepted. However, there is a lack of evidence-based standards governing this consensus. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the outer appendiceal diameter that maximizes sensitivity and specificity in a pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review of all urgent diagnostic ultrasounds (US) was performed over 2 years in children aged <18 years. The diagnostic accuracy of various cut-points was assessed by calculating the sensitivity and specificity and plotting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 398 patients in whom the appendix was visualized on US. The median outer appendiceal diameter was significantly higher in the surgical group compared to the nonsurgical group (9.4 mm; range = 8.1-12.0 vs. 5.5 mm; range = 4.4-6.5, p < 0.01). The optimal cut-point with the greatest area under the ROC curve was determined to be an outer appendiceal diameter of 7.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients, adopting a 7-mm rather than a 6-mm appendiceal diameter threshold would balance a greater number of missed cases of acute appendicitis for a reduction in the number of unnecessary surgeries.
BACKGROUND:Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain in children requiring operative intervention. Among a number of sonographic criteria to aid in the diagnosis of appendicitis, an outer diameter >6 mm is the most objective and widely accepted. However, there is a lack of evidence-based standards governing this consensus. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the outer appendiceal diameter that maximizes sensitivity and specificity in a pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review of all urgent diagnostic ultrasounds (US) was performed over 2 years in children aged <18 years. The diagnostic accuracy of various cut-points was assessed by calculating the sensitivity and specificity and plotting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 398 patients in whom the appendix was visualized on US. The median outer appendiceal diameter was significantly higher in the surgical group compared to the nonsurgical group (9.4 mm; range = 8.1-12.0 vs. 5.5 mm; range = 4.4-6.5, p < 0.01). The optimal cut-point with the greatest area under the ROC curve was determined to be an outer appendiceal diameter of 7.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients, adopting a 7-mm rather than a 6-mm appendiceal diameter threshold would balance a greater number of missed cases of acute appendicitis for a reduction in the number of unnecessary surgeries.
Authors: Ryne A Didier; Katharine L Hopkins; Fergus V Coakley; Sanjay Krishnaswami; David M Spiro; Bryan R Foster Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Marcos Roberto Gomes de Queiroz; Miguel José Francisco Neto; Antonio Rahal Junior; Victor Arantes Jabour; Guilherme Neves Lourenço Andrade; Paulo Savoia Dias da Silva; Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia; Marcelo Dos Santos Pereira; Marina Ramos Santos; Pedro Andrade Alencar Luna; Yoshino Tamaki Sameshima; Fabiana Gual; Marcelo Guimarães Dutra; Beatriz Placca Germino; Isabella Ferreira Alves Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2022-07-04
Authors: Sara C Fallon; Robert C Orth; R Paul Guillerman; Martha M Munden; Wei Zhang; Simone C Elder; Andrea T Cruz; Mary L Brandt; Monica E Lopez; George S Bisset Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-08-18