Literature DB >> 26279963

Improving the Utilization of Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cytology Co-testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Clinic.

Kurt Yoshino1, Maxine Karimoto1, Christina Marzo1, Bliss Kaneshiro1, Mark Hiraoka1.   

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with cervical cytology (HPV co-testing) has been recommended for cervical cancer screening for women 30 to 65 years of age. In several studies, HPV co-testing increased sensitivity for detecting high grade dysplasia and resulted in cost-savings. This retrospective cohort study assessed the prevalence of HPV co-testing in an obstetrics and gynecology resident clinic before and after a brief educational intervention which was designed to reinforce current cervical cancer screening recommendations. The intervention consisted of a short presentation that was given to all residents and medical assistants in October 2011. The proportion of women age 30-65 years of age who had cervical cancer screening with HPV co-testing as compared to cervical cytology alone was compared before and after the intervention using chi-square tests. The goal of the intervention was to increase the percentage of patients receiving co-testing from 0.5% to 7.8%. Each arm (pre- and post-intervention) required 130 subjects to achieve 80% power with a significance of P = .05. No significant differences in demographics including age, insurance type, and cytology were noted. HPV co-testing increased from 0% to 55% (P < .001). Of the 72 subjects who had co-testing, 58 (80%) will not need cervical cancer screening for another 5 years. HPV co-testing represents an underutilized cervical cancer screening modality for women 30 years and older. This brief educational intervention, adaptable to any clinical setting, significatnly increased co-testing at the clinical site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279963      PMCID: PMC4536738     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health        ISSN: 2165-8242


  15 in total

1.  Adherence to conservative management recommendations for abnormal pap test results in adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Jennifer R Jorgensen; Molly E McCoy; Sharon M Bak; Tracy A Battaglia; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance.

Authors:  Warner K Huh; Kevin A Ault; David Chelmow; Diane D Davey; Robert A Goulart; Francisco A R Garcia; Walter K Kinney; L Stewart Massad; Edward J Mayeaux; Debbie Saslow; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Use of electronic medical record-based tools to improve compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines: effect of an educational intervention on physicians' practice patterns.

Authors:  Paula White; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Cervical cancer trends in the United States: a 35-year population-based analysis.

Authors:  Olusola Adegoke; Shalini Kulasingam; Beth Virnig
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Trends of human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening at a large academic cytology laboratory.

Authors:  Darcy F Phelan; John K Boitnott; Douglas P Clark; Lisa C Dubay; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Is quality improvement sustainable? Findings of the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice.

Authors:  Adesuwa B Olomu; Manfred Stommel; Margaret M Holmes-Rovner; Andrew R Prieto; William D Corser; Venu Gourineni; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Optimal interval for routine cytologic screening in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Monisha Sharma; Jesse Ortendahl
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Eliane Duarte-Franco; Isabel Rodrigues; Stephen D Walter; James Hanley; Alex Ferenczy; Sam Ratnam; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cervical Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing in Adolescent Women: Implications in Management of a Positive HPV Test.

Authors:  Marilin Rosa; Amir Mohammadi
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Services Among Contractors of the Connecticut Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Morgan A Pratte; Amy Griffin; Chioma Ogazi; Susan Yurasevecz; Carol A Blanks; Lisa McCooey; Joy S Kaufman
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-04-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.